I've Written a Letter To Daddy
A propos of nothing in particular, this new book Sontag & Kael: Opposites Attract Me by Craig Seligman is getting a really puzzling amount of attention. Of course it isn't puzzling to see the excogitating classes talking about a critical book, but this one seems to have actual buzz, and I just can't figure out why anybody under the age of 100 would care about a critical reading of the critical readings of Susan Sontag or the late Pauline Kael, let alone a reading that combines them in some crabbed dialectic. Kael's movie reviews (for me at any rate) have not exactly aged like fine wine, and Sontag's latest efforts have been interesting mostly as fodder for mockery. I'm open-minded! Plenty of smart people seem to dig this book, and Seligman is as good a litterateur as any—though he once called a book review I wrote for Salon "dry." But is it really possible there are so many readers who don't get a sinking feeling at the thought of spending 200 pages with these old broads? I can only figure that Seligman is setting up a Kael-Sontag feud as a kind of critical Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?, with Seligman taking the coveted Victor Buono role.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Naught to say here, except that I dig both the word "excogitating" and the "Baby Jane"-ref title.
I wonder what Cavanaugh ate for breakfast today?
I wasted my time reading the book and Seligman has nothing original to say. Kael is worth reading, but only in little amounts. Sontag, if she ever was of interest, lost her hold on society soon after the 60s.
My memory from the time is that Kael was absolutely serious.
She really didn't know anyone who had voted for Nixon (or at least would admit it) and couldn't believe that her social circle was so unrepresentative.
The novels of Susan Sontag are self-indulgent, overrated crap.
My hunch is that she did intend it as a joke, but in our post-ironic age people no longer pick up on jokes. All I know is everybody I know voted for Ross Perot in '92, so according to my polling he got 100 percent of the popular vote.
Tim, I thought we were in the post-modern-ironic-structuralist-pre-next-whatever age. Now I'm so confused.
Buono is bueno! More Buono!