Smoking Ban Shocker!
Huge news out of Connecticut: The state's criminalization of smoking in bars has led to -- are you sitting down? -- less smoke in bars!
Supporters of Connecticut's comprehensive smoking ban said it would clear the air in bars and restaurants. New research shows it has done just that.
Researchers took before-and-after air samples in seven Hartford establishments that allowed smoking before the state ban went into full effect on April 1. Within weeks after the ban took effect, the levels of fine, airborne particles that are released in large numbers by burning cigarettes dropped 76 percent.
The watering holes where air was sampled - first on March 25 and then on April 23 - were Bourbon Street North, Black-Eyed Sally's, Coach's Sports Bar & Grille, On the Rocks, McKinnon's Irish Pub, The Half Door and The Spigot Caf?.
This study was conducted by the Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, N.Y. Glad to know the fight against cancer is going so well that there's money to burn on a study confirming the absolute obvious. But the research did yield one unexpected finding:
The only surprise in the study, [researcher Mark] Travers said, was that average particle levels from the first readings were somewhat lower than in other cities that have been evaluated. The reason, Travers said, was that the Hartford establishments are larger and have higher ceilings than many of the bars and restaurants tested elsewhere in the country. As a result, a greater volume of air diluted a comparable amount of smoke, he said.
The lower baseline average, he said, led to a slightly lower decline in post-ban measures, compared with some other cities. The 76 percent drop in Hartford compares with an 82 percent reduction in a study of seven cities that have enacted smoking bans. A before-and-after study in Delaware found a 90 percent drop.
Here's the Hartford Courant's story: "Study: Smoking Ban Has Cleared Air" (reg. required).
(Given the news, a better headline would have been: "Study: Smoking Ban Less Effective Than in Other States")
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Maybe the number of patrons at these establishments dropped by 76 percent.
It's not an exact analogy, but I felt the same way about this press release: "Cato Study Proposes Downsizing Government by $300 Billion"
Has anyone ever done a study on the effect of smoking on farting? Do smokers fart more, or less, than non-smokers?
Hmm, I wonder what the figures for bars with theatrical smoke machines to simulate the pre-ban ambiance would be like.
Also, I wonder if it'd be possible to find something even more harmful to the lungs that could be done in bars - maybe citronella candle smoke or something - after all, we could play on West Nile fears.
Then when you did such tests, the particulate in the air would actually go UP!
In all liklihood, the smoke was actually displaced to other places - places with higher concentrations of children!
Oh the humanity!!!
My town has a great barbeque joint that is also a popular drinking establishment. They've got a smoker installed about ten steps from the bar. Man, does it smell wonderful when they open it up to remove the finished meats! I've seen working fireplaces in some bars. Then there's dishes flambed at the table, birthday cake candles, decorative gas lamps...
Be creative, folks!
Kevin
Meat?!?! I'll have you know I'm a vegetarian, and as such, I have a right not to have to inhale your pig-flesh smoke when I go out for a drink. Hmmph!
(Just kidding, and gently mocking my herbivorous brethren. Lucky for me I usually like the smell of meat cooking.)
Scientists are known for insisting on slowly and painfully working out the suprisingly obvious. Its our way.
Actually though, it's good to check and make sure that, if we (as a country, not as H&R readers) are going to institute bans on smoking, that it actually does clear the air of the smoke we think is bad. No point harassing smokers if it doesn't lower the particulate matter in the air.
76%? Wouldn't one expect it to be 100% drop? We must find the source of this other 24% of "fine, particulate matter" at once! Its the government's DUTY to keep us all 100% safe from these biohazards. When, oh when, will I be free from ANY chance of harm from anything, ever? When will the government fulfill its mandate and keep me completely safe, even from myself?