30 Years Ago in Reason
"Consider the effects of a right to reply law. A newspaper…could surrender its editorial prerogatives and allow politicians and bureaucrats free access to its pages….Or, it could simply refuse to cover controversial public figures."
-- Robert Poole Jr., "No 'Right' to Reply"
"In almost every study of social affairs, scholars seek after 'the causes' of behavior -- but in terms of their metaphysical viewpoint, they must exclude people themselves."
-- Tibor Machan, "Science, Skinner, and Human Affairs"
"Businessmen are both victims and victimizers, legitimate recipients of praise -- for where would we be economically without such people -- and yet…legitimate recipients of scorn…for where would we be if some had not willingly participated in…corporate socialism?"
-- D.T. Armentano, "Petroleum, Politics, & Prices"
" [Paul Goodman's] political philosophy has always been fusionist -- uniting much of what is best in conservatism and anarchism….He devised no rigid ideology, but blended the various tendencies of his thinking into a social wisdom that was both innovative and traditional."
-- Ian Young, "Paul Goodman: American Anarchist"
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
gdgd