Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Put It All On Black. Or No Wait, Forget I Said That!

Tim Cavanaugh | 4.9.2004 1:17 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

New at Reason: Should you be thrown in the clink if you tell somebody about online gambling? Jacob Sullum doubles down on the DOJ's new definitions of thoughtcrime.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Psst. Afghan Warlord. Not Happy.

Tim Cavanaugh
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (6)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Skip Oliva   22 years ago

    Sullum's article discusses Antigua and Barbuda's WTO case against the U.S. ban on Internet gambling. I read the U.S. Trade Representative's brief in support of the ban (you can download the brief's executive summary at http://voluntarytrade.org/downloads/20031114gamblingexecfirstwritten.pdf), and the arguments were laughable. The USTR argues that gambling is a danger to children and public health, and that it can only be permitted in certain locations under strict government supervision. I hope the Antiguans introduced as evidence copies of the advertising state governments run for the lottery. After all, how often does the government promote something they've declared to be dangerous?

  2. Lord, I was born a gamblin' ma   22 years ago

    These companies have surrendered their First Amendment rights without a fight, allowing the government to silence speech it doesn't like by floating a legal theory that almost certainly would fail if it were tested in court. Their capitulation illustrates the chilling effect of vague laws in the hands of ambitious prosecutors.

    Right, Jacob. And I noticed that the hyperlinks to http://www.888.com and http://www.betonsports.com lead nowhere. Hedging your bets in case the Feds ARE watching?

  3. Jacob Sullum   22 years ago

    The faulty links are my fault. They should be fixed shortly.

  4. CharlesWT   22 years ago

    I had nothing against online gambling until the Golden Palace Casino hijacked my computer the other night. Took me about an hour to regain control of the computer and delete about 10MB of code that had been surreptitiously installed on it. Firewalls are becoming as necessary as browsers... 🙁

  5. garym   22 years ago

    Google said they wanted to "ensure we provide the best search experience for our users and advertisers." Must have been all those people complaining that they searched for gambling sites and actually found some.

    Here's my own contribution to Internet crime (found by searching Alta Vista):

    http://www.20bestcasinos.com/

  6. Jennifer   22 years ago

    I read the linked column about how computer guys who go to foreign countries and help set up their operations might be brreaking the law. Does it then follow that, say, an interior decorator in the US could be arrested if she goes overseas and decorates an Amsterdam brothel or marijuana shop?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: You've Got To Go

Charles Oliver | 11.3.2025 4:00 AM

How the Punisher, a Murderous Anti-Hero, Became the Mascot for Increasingly Militarized Police Forces

Joe Lancaster | From the December 2025 issue

Illinois Is Taking the Feds to Court Over 'Trump's Invasion' of Chicago

Autumn Billings | From the December 2025 issue

About 1 in 5 Kids Are at Risk of Losing SNAP. Centralized Control Keeps Failing Low-Income Families.

Romina Boccia and Tyler Turman | 11.1.2025 6:00 PM

Why Are Lawmakers Crusading Against Surge Pricing in Restaurants?

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 11.1.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300