Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

It's Rocket Science

Reason Staff | 4.8.2004 9:58 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

AP reports:

The government on Wednesday awarded a California aviation company the first license for a manned suborbital rocket.

More on NASA alternatives here and here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: 9/11 Accountability

Reason Staff
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (12)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Snooty American   21 years ago

    If'n it pisses off The Bart, I am in favor of keepin' it.

  2. Kirsten Tynan   21 years ago

    Most of the media has made the same mistake- the FAA is not licensing suborbital vehicles. It is licensing the LAUNCH of suborbital vehicles. This leads to a very different (less stringent) set of standards that must be met for a suborbital vehicle to fly. The focus is not on passenger safety, but on safety of uninvolved third parties and their property.

  3. Hydroman   21 years ago

    We could have saved billions of dollars if the complete space program was contracted to Elbert L. Rutan 25 years ago.

  4. nobody   21 years ago

    Yup. It would only have taken a $28 trillion check and an authorized signature.

  5. Jean Bart   21 years ago

    Would you please stop using the term "rocket science"; it really pisses off the aerospace engineers.

  6. nobody   21 years ago

    I prefer "particle physics."

  7. a pedant   21 years ago

    "Hey, people, this isn't aerospace engineering" just doesn't roll off the tongue as well, Jean Bart.

  8. a pedant   21 years ago

    "Hey, people, this isn't aerospace engineering" just doesn't roll off the tongue as well, Jean Bart.

  9. Mo   21 years ago

    Jean Bart,
    I dunno, most of the aerospace engineers I know like saying that they are "rocket scientists." Granted, it's usually in joke form. Example, when figuring something absurdly simple/obivous that everyone else missed, "It doesn't take a rocket scientist to (whatever), but in this case it did."

  10. a pedant   21 years ago

    Goddamned double post.

  11. Douglas Fletcher   21 years ago

    I knew a rocket scientist who was also a banjo player. Stanley Brothers stuff, mostly.

    Just thought I'd let you know.

  12. dj of raleigh   21 years ago

    The US doesn't own space.
    Why didn't they go to Mexico and light the candle?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Immigration Crackdown Could Make Wildfire Season Deadlier This Year

Jeff Luse | 8.28.2025 4:45 PM

The Real Threat to Fed Independence Isn't Trump. It's Congress' Debt Addiction.

Veronique de Rugy | 8.28.2025 4:30 PM

The 10th Circuit Agrees That Prosecuting Cannabis Consumers for Gun Possession May Be Unconstitutional

Jacob Sullum | 8.28.2025 4:15 PM

Federal Funding for Universities Comes With Strings. Now Trump Is Pulling Them.

Jack Nicastro | 8.28.2025 4:00 PM

Trump's Tariff Spin Is Putting Republicans in an Awkward Spot

Eric Boehm | 8.28.2025 3:45 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300