Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Onanists for Nader

Nick Gillespie | 3.18.2004 4:12 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Masturbate for Peace has endorsed Ralph Nader.

As Peter Bagge noted here, the group's main fundraising stratagem has already been used with success by candidates across the political spectrum.

[A clammy hand of thanks extended to reader Mark C. Coleman for the link]

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: F*ck Face vs. Femme Boy

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (19)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. joe   21 years ago

    Ever finished masturbating and thought, "Now I wanna kick someone's ass?" No?

    Well there you go.

  2. Warren   21 years ago

    "Onanists"!? Where do you learn words like that Nick? You been hanging out with the fundies?

  3. Jesse Walker   21 years ago

    Nader your nabob for peace!

  4. Joe Majsterski   21 years ago

    Warren, try the ancient Greeks.

  5. Gene Berkman   21 years ago

    Nader's 2004 campaign for President seems like political masturbation, so it is appropriate that this would be the first group to endorse him.

  6. Jeff A. Taylor   21 years ago

    Yes, but think of all the dead kittens. Please.

  7. Kevin Carson   21 years ago

    Is this anything like "Pissers for McGovern"?

    And are they actually supposed to *visualize* Nader while they're wanking? (shudder)

  8. Sandy   21 years ago

    Ever finished masturbating and thought, "Now I wanna regulate something?" No?

    Well there you go.

  9. pissing himself with laughter   21 years ago

    Thank you, Jeff A. Taylor, for the best laugh I've had so far this year.

  10. Ruthless   21 years ago

    Would this Onanist group give another idea a shake?
    Instead of "fuck foreigners," which we sometimes see even here on Hit and Run, how about "Fuck a foreigner."?
    What could be more motivational for peace?
    Naturally I'm suggesting Americans should not be paying travel expenses to Thailand to put my idea into action. If anything, we should be paying travel expenses for Thais to come here.
    Did I say come here?

  11. Franklin Harris   21 years ago

    How fitting, seeing as Nader is suck a d***.

  12. Franklin Harris   21 years ago

    Such, that is. Was that a Freudian slip, or what?

  13. dj of raleigh   21 years ago

    Ridicule is so cruel a tool to be beating Nader with.
    Reminds me:
    Oh how full of hate the democrats are!
    They hate Bush, hate Nader, hate rich people, too.

    I shouldn't say that, being registered as one,
    for democrats are full of love, as they say,
    for they love to make fun of Nader, of Bush, and tax breaks.

  14. Master Baiter   21 years ago

    One might add that posting to this
    thread is a form of masturbation.

  15. crimethink   21 years ago

    Ralph Nader received 2,882,955 votes in the 2000 election. If each of those people threw one masturbation house party and invited 16 friends, convincing them to vote for Nader through the power of masturbation, Nader could easily win the presidency, ushering in a new era of peace and self-love. So start planning your own 'Nads for Nader house party today!

    Damn, that actually makes sense! 😉

  16. Ruthless   21 years ago

    Fred,
    Just for the sake of Hit and Run bonding, when I heard those words, I had already traipsed along the Ho Chi Minh Trail as a USMC officer. In fact I had a particularly perilous day there the day of Nixon's inauguration in 1969.

    What I'm saying is, that, as a jarhead, I still don't know what nabob means, you long-haired hippie freak.

  17. Ruthless   21 years ago

    William Safire was the one who put the words, "nattering nabobs of negativism" into the mouth (so to speak) of Spiro Agnew.
    If Amurika had only known then what it meant--rather than having been mesmerized by its alliteration--Bill and Spiro would have been tarred and feathered, eh!

  18. Fred   21 years ago

    Ruthless,

    I knew what it meant back then and I wondered how anyone could be as foolish as Agnew and Safire to utter such words. Wouldn't the nabobs who supported him be insulted? No, because they were just ignorant fools who happened to be wealthy businessmen. I wanted to bring this to their attention, but what could a long-haired, hippy freak do?

  19. dj of raleigh   21 years ago

    280 million total US Population in 2000
    -70 million under 18
    ------------equals
    210 million possible voters
    -5 million illegals
    -----------equals
    205 million possible voters
    -4 million felons
    -----------equals
    201 million possible voters
    -104 million actually voted for president in 2000
    -----------means
    .......about half of the people voted

    Surveys indicate 1 in 5 of these voters
    have significant factual understanding
    of a variety of issues and candidates.

    That means that only 1 of 10
    of the people eligible to vote
    know enough to vote intelligently, and do,
    and I say 2 of the 5 voted for Gore
    and I say 2 of the 5 voted for Bush
    and I say 1 in 5 of them (2 million)
    voted for Nader in 2000.

    Looking at it that way,
    Nader did OK with those in the know.

    The two majors sucked off about a million each
    of the so-called realists.
    (Take it any way you want.)
    If hand dipped ice cream taste best
    and hand washed car washes look best,
    then the hand-job-vote might bring Nader off,
    but who wants to pull the lever behind them?
    Stop picking on Nader!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: A Bit of a Stretch

Charles Oliver | 6.19.2025 4:00 AM

This Court Case Could Normalize Vibes-Based Regulation

Veronique de Rugy | 6.19.2025 1:00 AM

VIDEO: Masked ICE Agents Arrest Afghan Ally Following Immigration Court Hearing

Beth Bailey | 6.18.2025 5:45 PM

SCOTUS Upholds Tennessee Law Banning Medical Transition for Transgender Kids

Emma Camp | 6.18.2025 5:01 PM

The F-35 Ages Worse Than the Planes It's Meant To Replace

Joe Lancaster | 6.18.2025 4:25 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!