Boobs In Congress
New at Reason: Nick Gillespie discusses the many recent dustups, brouhahas, and hair-breadth 'scapes i' the imminent deadly push for more media content rules from Congress.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In Tim's 3:51PM H&R post, Shock of the New, right above this one, he points out vaccination and heart transplants as one-time popular "crimes against humanity," which thankfully are now just facts of life.
Can a converse model be applied to the subject of this post?
In other words, which censorship "crimes against humanity" (perpetrated, of course, by gubmint) are now just facts of life? Hell, we probably don't even call them censorship anymore.
Criminalizing the screaming of "fire" in the theater?
Your choice of derogatory bon mots as they relate specifically to a hate crime?
Others?