Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

T&Atheism

Julian Sanchez | 3.8.2004 12:31 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Raelian women march topless to protest "the repressive myth of God." Story and headline shamelessly lifted from Jeff Patterson.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Ok, But What Do You Do for a Sequel?

Julian Sanchez is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (24)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Pavel   21 years ago

    A woman's inherent sensuality and femininity are as crucial to her personal well being as they are to society as a whole because they are the very antidotes to war invariably waged by men.

    Uhm?

    I think Homer (not the cartoon character) would disagree.

    War, while not always necessary, is a purging of the sins of both sexes.

  2. Warren   21 years ago

    "The Raelian Revolution, the world's largest Atheist, non-profit UFO related organisation"

    Some things speak for themselves.

  3. zymurgist   21 years ago

    2004 is the international year of atheism?

    Why was I never informed of this?

  4. Jeff   21 years ago

    The odds of God existing are now at 67%. Place your bets.
    http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/sciences/story/0,12243,1164894,00.html

  5. Jeff   21 years ago

    The odds of God existing are now at 67%. Place your bets.
    http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/sciences/story/0,12243,1164894,00.html

  6. Jennifer   21 years ago

    I read the article, and there is a 99% chance that the scientist is a twit.

    Serious question: if God truly exists, then why has there never been a case of two societies, developing independently of each other, coming up with the same conclusion about God? All societies came to the same conclusions about gravity (things fall down, not up), cyanide (you eat it and you die), pregnant women (they've had sex at least once in the past nine months); yet attitudes about God are as varied as attitudes about clothing styles, tastes in music, et cetera. This more than anything else proves that God, and religion in general, is a cultural rather than factual phenomenon.

  7. Shawn Smith   21 years ago

    "...women represent 55% of the world's population..."

    What population are they refering to? Humans in industrialized societies over 50 years old?

    Shawn S.

  8. Jennifer   21 years ago

    Shawn--
    They are referring to the world population in general. In industrialized nations where childbirth is no longer a life-threatening event, women tend to live 5-7 years longer than men. On average, the boy:girl infant birth ratio is something like 103:100; however, although slightly more male infants are born, the males are also slightly more likely to die in infancy than girls.

    Of course, in places like China the ratio is screwed up due to the one-child policy where females are aborted to ensure that the One Child is a son, but overall, when reproduction is left to natural forces, there's usually slightly more women than men on Earth at any given time. This was likely true even before industrialization.

    And there is a valid biological reason why we produce slightly more girls than boys--when it comes to reproductive matters, one man can in theory make billions of babies in a year, whereas one woman can only make one baby. Thus you need an extra-big backup supply of females, in case of a population bottleneck.

  9. tom wright   21 years ago

    'Thus you need an extra-big backup supply of females, in case of a population bottleneck.'

    OK, where do I sign up?

    Tom

  10. kwais   21 years ago

    Jennifer,
    Not that this is biology 101 or anything, but why is the birth ratio 103:100 instead of equal?

  11. Sir Real   21 years ago

    Kwais-

    While not Jennifer here, the best explanation I've heard comes down to good old fashioned physics. The "Y" chromosome is smaller than the "X" chromosome. Hence, "Y" sperm will be lighter, and thus swim faster.

  12. JD   21 years ago

    Jennifer - actually, in one of my anthropology classes, we discussed a society with some interesting ideas about pregnancy. (I can't remember where it was now, unfortunately.) These people believed that a woman became pregnant when an ancestor spirit returned to their island. An anthropologist who wondered how they could be unaware of the physical origin of babies decided to approach the issue indirectly, by asking them where piglets came from, and they gave a perfect explanation: the pigs mate, and the female pig gets pregnant, etc. But asked if it might work the same way with humans, they were shocked and loudly denied the possibility. Seems strange, but if humans are good at one thing, it's keeping themselves blind to their own inconsistencies.

  13. Douglas Fletcher   21 years ago

    Actually, the important question here is whether or not there is a God but whether or not there are enough good-looking athiest chicks to make this worth a look.

  14. Jennifer   21 years ago

    JD-
    I remember hearing about that society or one similar. But there is another possibility, too, as Carl Sagan once pointed out: if some weird-looking, weirdly-dressed stranger came to my village and asked me a bunch of patronizing questions like "Do you know where babies come from?" I would be very tempted to look him right in the eye and talk about cabbage patches and storks.

    Even if these folks do believe this, they can manage anyway; obviously they're stil having sex enoughb to have the necessary kids. My point concerning atheism is that there have NEVER been two societies who independently discovered the same God.

  15. The Lonewacko Blog   21 years ago

    "why has there never been a case of two societies, developing independently of each other, coming up with the same conclusion about God?"

    One problem with this question is that very few societies have developed independently. The various Nordic, Greek, Roman, and Indian gods were derived from early IE gods. In some cases those gods were influenced by non-IE gods.

  16. Mark S.   21 years ago

    Thank you Raelian goof balls! Thank you so very much for giving critics of atheism the ammunition they need. We can take being written off as "blasphemers", but it's going to be hard to live down a "kook" label.

  17. Mark S.   21 years ago

    "...the very antidotes to war invariably waged by men."

    So Margaret Thatcher and Elizabeth I were really men?

  18. Mo   21 years ago

    Jennifer,
    Until modern times, when we could essentially watch a solar system form, there were zillions of theories on how the stars in the sky were formed and how the solar sytem came about. No two societies came up with the same answer and if they did, none came up with hot, flaming gasses spun, coalesced and formed stars and planets. That is the right answer (as far as we know) and only technology allowed us to discover the truth. Also, plenty of societies independently "knew" the world was flat, they just weren't right. Of course creation stories are going to vary, we don't have any way to observe it, unlike gravity, pregnancy and cyanide.

  19. Isaac Bartram   21 years ago

    Mark S.

    "So Margaret Thatcher and Elizabeth I were really men?"

    Must have been. Indira Ghandi and Golda Meir too.

  20. Ruthless   21 years ago

    Any discreet Raelian women in the Cincinnati area are cordially invited to petition me by e-mail for an interview... possibly leading toward a tiny tutorial in anarchy.
    Yeah anarchy. That's the ticket.

  21. Jennifer   21 years ago

    Mo-

    I am not talking about creation stories. I am talking about the existence of God. Is he mortal or immortal? Different societies have disagreed. Powerful or weak? Male or female? Interested in Humanity or aloof?

    Different cultures had different religious (creative, cultural, invented) ideas about the sun god, but all cultures agreed on the basic scientific facts: the sun is yellow, hot, and invisible at night. For all the variety in cultures, there has never been one which believed that the sun was a cold purple night-dweller instead.

    So I ask: if God exists, what are his basic characteristics that all humans have noticed? Some say God is immortal. Some have gods who die. Some gods are omnipotent, some stupid. some all-powerful, some all-limited. . .some believe in an afterlife, some don't, and no two Afterlifes are alike.

    Sounds like invention, not discovery.

  22. heh2k   21 years ago

    this thread is worthless without pics!!!! 8)

  23. Jeff   21 years ago

    But are they cloned breasts?

  24. Jennifer   21 years ago

    Kwais--

    If the book of Leviticus is any indication, God wants us to worship him because he has the same emotional maturity I had when I was four years old and unwillingly starting to face the fact that I was NOT the center of the Universe, and I would NOT always get my way in life.

    "Whaddaya mean I can't have anything I want anytime I want it? WAAAA! I hate you and I hope you die! You're the meanest mommy in the WHOLE WORLD!!!"

    Only instead, we get:
    "Whaddaya mean you're not gonna worship me? WAAAA! I hate you and I hope you go to Hell! And I mean that literally!"

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Haste Begets Lawlessness

Jacob Sullum | 6.4.2025 12:01 AM

D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 6:00 PM

It's Rand Paul and Elon Musk vs. Donald Trump Over the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Eric Boehm | 6.3.2025 4:35 PM

Female Nude Spa in Washington Can't Bar Transgender Clients With Male Genitalia, Federal Court Rules

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 4:20 PM

Trump Cut Funds From Wasteful Projects To Spend on Wasteful Statue Garden

Joe Lancaster | 6.3.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!