Michael Novak, Like Hank Williams Jr., Is Ready for Some Football
Over at National Review, Michael Novak is ready for some football, which he sez possesses "inherent beauty." But instead of seeing super-charged, steroid-driven modern-day gladiators dispalying "the love of brothers for one another," whaddya get? Anti-religious cheesecake at half time. As the off-season commences, he channels Allan Bloom and asks the tough questions:
Why…has the NFL been so dense as to allow its halftime show, year after year, to be a celebration of decadence and degradation?
If the moral morons the NFL hires to produce these shows set out to dramatize the last days of the Roman empire in all its legendary sickness, what would they do differently? Who are these seemingly drugged, indifferent, writhing pagan figures they now throw around the platform? These are not living human beings in action, these are sacks of flesh, writhing, grinding, pawing, acting out no higher appeal than bodily functions. They evoke no virtues of the human spirit. It is as if they wish to suffocate any spark of Jewish or Christian womanhood and manhood. It is as if they mean to corrupt, seduce, degrade. A more radically anti-Jewish and anti-Christian assault, embodying the sort of Wagnerian images of pagan disgust and decay that enraptured Hitlerian audiences, would be hard for them to produce.
Novak's final solution to halftime hell?
Why doesn't the NFL stage a ten-year sequence of halftime shows that tell the great story of the Founding of our nation? For this story embodies all the virtues required by championship football, and many others besides.
For a look at how manhandling women fits into championship 'ball, go here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This is satire, correct?
In the middle ages, when the church would sponsor plays in localities, the most popular places concerned not stories of piety, etc., but those concerned with Satan as well as the bloody crucifixion of Christ. Or to be more blunt, in the 1950s many futurists thought that T.V. would be a great "teacher" and that everyone would be watching classical music concerts on it. Not quite. 🙂
You're forgetting, Jean Bart, this is America that we're talking about.
If Wagner was alive, I suspect he'd sue both Novak and MTV for that column.
Holy crap! That guy is dark. I see typical sexually-charged concert material, he sees writhing flesh sacks foretelling the downfall of the U.S.
If he turned this in in middle school I'd have him sent to the school counselor, just in case.
BTW, whatever you think of Wagner in his personal views, he was a great composer.
Now hang on... I thought that the whole point of football was supposed to be a modern-day gladitorial festival to keep the masses sated with bread and circuses. What better way to complete the circle with decadent features at halftime?
I went to a bunch of Jets games growing up as a teenager, and I attended games well into my 20s. I don't remember reflecting on the "hard work, sacrifice, the endurance of pain, precision, discipline, the love of brothers for one another, guts, spirit, the will to overcome adversity, and intense and sustained determination." I do remember a lot of drunkenness in the stands and at the tailgate parties, however.
Hmmmm ... not sure I live on the same planet
at these folks.
Jeff
It all went wrong when they cast aside Up with People.
http://www.superbowl.com/features/entertainment/halftime-honorroll
Bring back "Up With People!"
Isn't Michael Novak a priest, or do I have him confused with some other Nat. Review writer?
The whole conservative religious thing you get at Nat. Review is pretty hard to take, I find, athiest that I am. It's something to wade through on the way to more interesting writing by people like Goldberg & Hanson.
Boy I was thinking the exact same thing watching the halftime show -- the people of the Third Reich would have loved this, what with Nelly, PDiddy, et. al.!
Why doesn't the NFL stage a ten-year sequence of halftime shows that tell the great story of the Founding of our nation? Will this include the slaughter of the indians?
"...to dramatize the last days of the Roman empire in all its legendary sickness, what would they do differently?"
Kill people? Use slaves for entertainment?
Will this include the slaughter of the indians?
No, Dan Snyder's managing that quite well already.
"...to dramatize the last days of the Roman empire in all its legendary sickness, what would they do differently?"
BTW, I don't exactly what he means by sickness, but if he means gladiatorial contests, well those originated during the Republic; indeed, the first Roman gladiatorial games were held in 246 BCE by Marcus and Decimus Brutus in honor of their father, Junius Brutus, as a munus or funeral gift for the dead.
Indeed, the later years of the empire, assuming he means the Western empire, the games were banned by the Christian church, which had become ascendent after Constantine's Milvian Bridge victory.
The problem with the half-time show at the Super Bowl is that the executives try too hard to appeal to women, but the whole game is geared to men, so they end up programming for a demographic from a perspective that's completely cock-eyed.
Look at the ad programming for your average regular season game: Beer commercials, ads for cars, shaving cream and cheeseburgers. (Homer says, "mmmm...cheeseburgers.") It's all marketed to men.
The Super Bowl comes along and, suddenly, the women are watching.
I go to a lot of different sports bars during the season, and the average ratio of men to women in these places is easily ten to one. And regular men outnumber metrosexuals by like fifty to one. What is it about these regular season fans makes programming executives think that the average football fan wants to see Justin Timeberlake do anything...ever?
I may not have given that enough emphasis...JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE for Christ's sake!
When I was in high school, your average football fan type would trash can anybody who looked, spoke or acted like Justin Timberlake, and then they would give him a wedgie just to be sure. I'm not saying that this was right, I'm saying that it was.
The network executives know that all these guys are going to watch anyway, so they use the halftime show to try to get single women to watch.
But single women don't like Football, and they don't like people who like Football.
Every Super Bowl party I've ever been to features a woman (or an effeminate man) who complains about the violence in the game. As if the govenment should step in and make it two-hand touch! For PETE'S SAKE!
Well this problem with the half time show wouldn't have happened if the executives hadn't tried to emascualte the entertainment and market it to women. (Yes, I know Kid Rock did his bit.)
Founding Fathers at half time? How 'bout a wrestling match? Maybe boxing! Or, at least, some musical act that doesn't dance.
No dancing.
The only people that should dance in the Super Bowl are the players and, even then, only after they score.
P.S. (Begin sarcastic effeminate voice) "Well I'm a woman and I really like football. Are you saying that my feelings shouldn't be considered?" (End sarcastic effeminate voice)
YES! I'm saying that your feelings shouldn't be considered.
You may "like football", but you don't like it the same way we do.
No you don't!
P.P.S. Whoever thought of taking the score, the down, how many yards are needed for a first, and the amount of time left, and placing all this data up in one of the corners of the television screen was a genius.
I'm sure this act alone put a good sized dent in the divorce rate.
Damn straight, Schultz. Tell it like it is (or was, anyway).
Shultz,
It may be 10-1 at the sports bars during the rest of the football season, but every Super Bowl party I've been to as had a more equal ratio. The women go to the parties to eat and drink. They don't care about the game.
A.J.
10-1? Y'all haven't been to Wisconsin, where the fairer sex is 40% of the Packer fanbase.
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/sday/sday8897.stm
How about this for a halftime show -- knowledgeable analysts debate the first half and predict the second?
Nah. What's Prince doing next January?
What kind of Pete Rose filter do we need on football?
Sports are sports. Tit's are tits.
We need tits at least as perky as the sport. (That one weren't)
Was there a Hall of Fame for gladiators around the year zero of the christer era? Who was denied entry?
Tit booster/supporter/groper.
If the moral morons the NFL hires to produce these shows set out to dramatize the last days of the Roman empire in all its legendary sickness, what would they do differently?
They could feed Christian zealots to lions?
If the Super Bowl worked that way, I'd watch.
My roomie used to tie straps around his ankles, and tie the other ends to the bed posts, so he could stretch. He seemed completely unaware of the impression this created.
I think he would have really enjoyed Sparta.
I kind of like mojo jojo's idea. Normally, come super bowl halftime, I go and take my dog for it's evening stroll to the nearby park and get back in time for the second half kick off. If there was cheerleading ass shaking, the dog's going to have to wait til after the game.
Michael Novak wrote: "the endurance of pain, precision, discipline, the love of brothers for one another . . . and intense and sustained determination."
And I'd been thinking for years that Novak was *against* the normalization of homosexuality.
"1965 in the United States was a time of turbulence and negativism. Young people were chanting 'down with the administration' and 'don't trust anyone over thirty'. With this backdrop, Blanton Belk, along with the Colwell Brothers -- Steve, Paul and Ralph -- and Herb Allen, sought to find a positive vehicle for young people to speak to the students in America and the world.
"Searching for a theme to express their alternative to the negativism which surrounded them, they came up with the thought that 'If there is anything they could be for it is people.' The phrase Up With People became a song and conviction, and the name of an organization that would become a worldwide force in the field of international education and international relations. In 1968, Up with People was incorporated as a non-profit 501c3 educational organization in the United States and its historic and important journey officially commenced."
I am an atheist, yet I find myself agreeing with the religious right more often than not these days. Somewhere libertarianism has been distorted and equated with the absence of values. Morality and values are not exclusive to religous fanaticism.
While I oppose censorship on principle and am not personally offended by such displays, I find it very sad that many of you cannot allow for the possibility that free-thinking individuals may find something wrong ( or at least philosophically dangerous) with "sacks of flesh, writhing, grinding, pawing, acting out no higher appeal than bodily functions."
The primitive tribal orgies were enough to ruin the second Matrix for me ( in addition to just being a terrible movie).
And I would also point to Reason's magazine celebration of The greatest Libertarians of All Time ( or whatever it was called) that showcased many who contributed nothing other than being pornographers or talentless "musicians."
graham,
"I find it very sad that many of you cannot allow for the possibility that free-thinking individuals may find something wrong ( or at least philosophically dangerous) with 'sacks of flesh, writhing, grinding, pawing, acting out no higher appeal than bodily functions.'"
It's not that the possibility isn't allowed for, but rather that there isn't the tiniest shred of evidence that there's anything inherently wrong or "philosophically dangerous" about sexual entertainment. When people start to provide evidence to accompany their shrieks of horror, then they'll be taken a little more seriously.
Also, what's wrong with being a pornographer (besides, of course, the fact that you wouldn't choose that for yourself)?
And which "talentless musicians" did Reason list as great libertarians?
All halftime shows should be 5 minutes of one teams chearleaders shaking that ass then a short break then 5 minutes of the other teams chearleaders shaking that ass then back to the game.
The tit that shook the world.
(...and most of em look like GBP offensive linemen, don't they?...)
Whoa : SteveInClearwater
As someone who has crossed the country from coast to coast I have to say the most attractive women inthe USA are from Wisconsin, Indiana and Mississippi. Anyone want to dispute that?
So, a woman's breast is obscene, but sweaty muscular men in tight uniforms crashing into each other and tackling each other to the ground has "inherent beauty?" SOund slike Mike Novak is gayer than Tinky-Winky.
"Sounds like," not "sound slike."
Yeah, that "inherent beauty" statement sounds an awful lot like the lead-in to that old NFL Films slo-mo "ballet" sequence set to classical music. Hilarious bit, though, and it's an example of how NFL Films often mocks its own self-seriousness about the game.
Jennifer,
Never for apologize for lubricating the ol' uvula.
It can get crispy quick.
The halftime show is geared towards women and metros because everyone else is watching anyway. Most football fans would tune in to the Superbowl if they ran test patterns at halftime. I certainly would.
They evoke no virtues of the human spirit...
Umm, it's football, dude. If you want to elevate your spirit, maybe you should just, you know, go to church on Superbowl Sunday...
I've never had any interest in watching football before, but this article makes it sound pretty appealing. If the Superbowl actually was a pagan celebration of moral degradation I would be its biggest fan.
Jack, lol. I used to live with one of these monk types, as I call them. They fetishize every masculine rat brain impulse - sweat, blood, pain, teamwork, strength, etc - except for sex. No sex anywhere. But of course, we know that the human psyche can't exist with "no sex anywhere," so where does it go? How about into sex, blood, pain, teamwork, and strength?
Dontcha just love it when cultural conservatives invoke the Roman Empire! It any of these mental midgets would ever actually study the history they supposedly invoke they would find out, among other things: 1) The fall of the corrupt, despotic Roman Empire was not enitrely a bad thing, and 2) A major contributor to the Empire's fall was the rise of Christianity (does that mean that the Religious Right is responsible for our society's imminent collapse? Hmmmmmm)...
"1) The fall of the corrupt, despotic Roman Empire was not enitrely a bad thing"
Corrupt and despotic though it may have been towards the end, can you name what good came out of it? I consier it to be the greatest tragedy in the known history of mankind.
"A major contributor to the Empire's fall was the rise of Christianity"
I couldn't agree more. But I don't think it's fair to suggest that the Religious Wrong, repugnant though it may be, is the modern equivalent of the Roman-era Christians. It was the Christians' pacifism, asceticism, and glorification of human weakness that wound up seriously damaging Rome. Today, such a value system most closely resembles that of the loony, anti-globalist left.
I think the values of the Religious Wrong bear a stronger resemblance to those of the Old Testament Hebrews. Culturally and spiritually suicidal, but not economically or militarily.
At least these occasions of bread and circuses aren't entirely state-sponsored.
And yes, the Fall of Rome occurred after it was a Christian Empire. Decadent, overcentralized and Christian. I guess God was on the side of the Goths, an idea that offends my black-clad teenage daughter to no end.
Speaking of Novak (neocon Mikey, not the great conservative "Body Slam"-er Bob), I found out, not too long ago, that he - like many of the neoconservatives - is a latecomer to the anti-communist cause. Someone posted excerpts, at the Libertarian Today message board, of this excellent article by a great conservative columnist.
Like Richard Perle, Michael Novak was a Democrat who backed Scoop Jackson. The neoconservatives have brought with them, during their migration rightward, their statist philosophy from the Left.
Ah, so Novak's complaining that the half time show should Praise the Glory of the Revolution?
How.... Soviet.
For that matter, I understand North Korean media are pretty much chock-full of paeans to their grand and mighty nation.
Shultz: Hey, at the Super Bowl party I was at, there were two men and about ten women. Yeah, yeah, I know what you're thinking. But one of the women was my girlfriend, and almost all the rest were lesbians anyway. Not everybody was really into the game, but I didn't hear anybody complain about the violence - heck, the biggest football fan there was a woman. Nobody wanted to see Justin Timberlake, though.