Rush's Friends at the ACLU
As Ron notes, the ACLU is defending Rush Limbaugh's privacy. Yesterday the organization's Florida chapter sought permission to file a friend-of-the-court brief faulting prosecutors for snatching Limbaugh's medical records without first giving him a chance to challenge the seizure, as required by state law.
Prosecutors say they need the records to investigate Limbaugh's narcotic purchases--a somewhat puzzling claim, inasmuch as they are unlikely to find a prescription authorizing him to buy pain pills from his maid. Still, they probably would have had little trouble obtaining the requisite subpoena even if they had followed the letter of the law. At issue, presumably, is not just whether Limbaugh used opioids for nonmedical purposes but whether his doctor prescribed them inappropriately.
The principle raised by the seizure of Limbaugh's records is still important, of course: Prosecutors have to obey the law even when it's inconvenient. And it is edifying for dittoheads to see Limbaugh, no fan of the ACLU, benefit from the group's dedication to that principle. But when it comes to the intimate details of what we put into our bodies, the law cannot provide much privacy protection as long as the government insists upon policing our bloodstreams.
That's a theme I'd like to hear Limbaugh discuss on his show.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
this may be enough to encourage Rush to develop some principles of his own.
Okay, that does it Rush, I'm calling in my marker. Give back the talent.
You can keep the chair and the golden (painted) EIB microphone, but, as you so long assertained, the talent is mine, and I want it back.
Sometimes the leftist agenda of the ACLU really makes me angry. But then they go and do something like stand up for their principles even if it means defending their harshest critics. You just have to really respect that. We see far too little of it these days. Three cheers to the ACLU on this one.
I'm at the age where I'm more interested in pragmatism than principles, which is why I think it would be better if the ACLU stayed out of this one. The War on Drugs will never end so long as the only casualties are the poor, dark-skinned folk; we need to get the pale and the wealthy incarcerated, too. Imagine if Noelle Bush had been imprisoned for her earlier shenanigans!
Limbaugh goes off on this when it comes to the Tobacco Police, that's for sure. It's become increasingly clear that he'd probably be more vocal on this sort of thing if not for his friendship with Bill Bennett.
I think the proper response is that a broken clock is right twice a day. 😉
Prosecutors say they need the records to investigate Limbaugh's narcotic purchases--a somewhat puzzling claim, inasmuch as they are unlikely to find a prescription authorizing him to buy pain pills from his maid.
As I recall, they suspect Rush of getting several simultaneous prescriptions from different doctors.
I'd like to hear Rush discuss our lack of freedom over what we ingest, too, and I'd like to see him pay back the ACLU with some friendly remarks on-air, but I ain't holding my breath.
So now Limbaugh is another case of a "criminal" trying to "get off on a technicality"? Mr. Law'n'Order is standing up for the rights of the accused? Oh, boy, Rush is SOFT ON CRIME! But maybe with the help of his anti-American ACLU buddies, he'll get a slap on the wrist from a bleeding-heart liberal judge.
It just goes to prove the old saying: A conservative is a liberal who got mugged; a liberal is a conservative who got arrested.
Or maybe the rights of the accused are only for middle-aged white Republicans.
That's a theme I'd like to hear Limbaugh discuss on his show.
Can I get an Amen?!
A conservative is a liberal who got mugged; a liberal is a conservative who got arrested.
Heh. Have both of those happen to you and you turn into a anarchist of sorts, Kevin? 🙂
Nothing like warm humble pie on a cold winter morning in court. However, I fear Rush can't ingest humble pie and may likely choke on it.