Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Policy

Data

Rose-Colored Calculators

Julian Sanchez | From the January 2004 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Advocates of Medicare and Social Security reform have long complained that fuzzy accounting makes the programs appear to be more fiscally sound than they are. The trustees of both programs focus on the average actuarial balance over time, assuming that future surpluses in some years will cancel out deficits in others. On that optimistic assumption, the average projected actuarial imbalance over 75 years is a relatively manageable 2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP).

But as an October report by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) documents, this approach is misleading. "For 2003, the trustees project a combined surplus for Social Security and Hospital Insurance of 1.94 percent of taxable payroll," the report says, "but for 2075, they project a deficit of 14.14 percent of taxable payroll." By then, the CBO projects that the two programs together will consume 16 percent of GDP, more than double the current level.

Graph: Projected Costs of Social Security and Medicare as percentage of GDP

(not available online)

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Welcome Back, Napster

Julian Sanchez is a contributing editor at Reason.

PolicySocial Security
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (1)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. nfl jerseys   16 years ago

    bty

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Graham Platner Dropped Out, but His Shadow Lingers Over Democrats and U.S. Politics

J.D. Tuccille | 7.10.2026 8:30 AM

Review: A Chaotic History Podcast for People Who Don't Care About Historical Accuracy

Reem Ibrahim | From the August/September 2026 issue

Brickbat: Hard Labor

Charles Oliver | 7.10.2026 4:00 AM

'Scrap It and Start All Over': Ex-Bush and Obama Officials Say the War on Terror's Powers Have Gone Too Far

Billy Binion | 7.9.2026 5:35 PM

Pronatalists Want To Boost Fertility With Blue Laws and Government-Enlisted Fertility Influencers

Meagan O'Rourke | 7.9.2026 4:35 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason