Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Hacking Stoplights

Jesse Walker | 10.28.2003 4:14 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Here's something that's useful only if no one else has one.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Gone To Pot

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (32)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Blaine hilton   22 years ago

    Pretty soon I see all lights being green...

    ~crash~

  2. Steven Crane   22 years ago

    I suggest putting tinfoil hats on all the stoplights.

  3. Anonymous   22 years ago

    anarchy in action!

    go anarchy!

  4. Anonymous   22 years ago

    My God, people would be forced to treat stoplights as stop signs. Sheer chaos I tell you!

  5. Larry   22 years ago

    I always thought the state lottery should have a drawing for one of these "turn the lights green" devices that you could use (or rent out) for one year.

    Personally I would be happy if the stoplights around where I live switched to blinking red/blinking yellow from 11pm-6am or so. Few things get me as angry as sitting at a red light when there's no traffic whatsoever in a 1/2 mile radius.

  6. Warren   22 years ago

    This is an old story. A friend of mine had a strobe light that did the same thing back in 1980. It's also a non story, there simply aren't many places where it will work, and there are lots of options available to comunities if it even begins to be a problem.

  7. thoreau   22 years ago

    I always thought the best way to do it is have Scott Evil hack into the computer that controls the traffic lights. Not only will you have a smooth ride, you'll also be able to pin your enemies in traffic jams and steal their stuff.

    (Those who didn't see the Italian Job this summer won't get that.)

  8. Jesse Walker   22 years ago

    there are lots of options available to comunities if it even begins to be a problem.

    Care to expand on that, Warren?

  9. Jack   22 years ago

    Jesse,

    I think Warren was referring to strobe-light or radio activated systems, both of which are already in service in other communities.

  10. Eric Cartman   22 years ago

    That is fucking sweet, you guys.

  11. Concerned Citizen   22 years ago

    "People are gullible, and they have discretionary income," said P. David Fisher, professor emeritus of electrical engineering at Michigan State University.

    2003 Most Blatantly Obvious Statement of The Year Award Nominee, Dr. P. David Fisher.

  12. s.m. koppelman   22 years ago

    It amazes me that the traffic light systems that have this sort of override use something that can easily be spoofed. You'd think it would occur to someone evaluating these things in the last ten years to ask about the system's security.

  13. Jay   22 years ago

    Unfortunately, this gadget generally only works for "offline" isolated intersections with little or no pedestrian activity. Most larger cities have their signals controlled by a mainframe computer most of the day to maintain at least a bare minimum of synchronization.
    You will find the occasional "pre-empt" application near fire halls, but again usually only effective for the immediately adjacent intersections (when the alarm goes off, the firemen push a button to stop traffic from blocking the driveway).
    The "in-vehicle" devices haven't been used as widely due to the fact that they completely throw the signals out of whack once the emergency vehicle has passed. (I hear you all saying; the synchronization sucks anyway, but in fact traffic would be an even bigger nightmare without compatible frequencies and adequate green-time offsets).

    As for flash mode at night, the nannys at your local roads department are probabably cowed by liability concerns should a pedestrian need to cross the main street in the middle of the night. Studies showed collision rates increased at locations where they implemented flash mode. In any event, if the delays give you grief and there's no one around, just run it like I do (after coming to a full and complete stop of course) provided there are no evil red-light cams in your jurisdiction.

    There, that's my traffic engineering geekery for today. Sorry, I couldn't resist.

  14. Neb Okla   22 years ago

    I wonder if a programmable remote would work at close range - in the dark?

    And if other drivers saw you, I wonder what they'd think when they saw you change the light with your remote. 🙂

  15. Luca Brasi   22 years ago

    >>>I always thought the best way to do it is have Scott Evil hack into the computer that controls the traffic lights. Not only will you have a smooth ride, you'll also be able to pin your enemies in traffic jams and steal their stuff.

  16. tzs   22 years ago

    Anyone who buys one of these things thinking he's got something nifty that will turn lights green is a living example of the aphorism "a fool and his money are soon parted."

    First of all, it won't work unless you have a pre-empt signal receiver hooked up to the stop light. Second, you've got to hope you're dealing with a cheap system that is so mind-brainingly ill-designed there would be no security whatsoever. (Traffic control designers out there, take note when the city council tries to shove the cheap cut-rate option off on you, whining about budgetary problems.)

    I worked with the 3M Opticom system (the top--and standard--optical preempt system out there) for many years in Japan and I can tell you that just flickering a infrared emitter at the receiver is about as likely to trigger it as waving a flashlight at it. There is quite a lot of security in the system--in the signal, in the coding, and in the signal processing.

    My feeling is the manufacturers of these devices are laughing all the way to the bank knowing they have produced something totally useless but their customers won't dare ask for refunds.

  17. Jim Henley   22 years ago

    Only Batman should have this technology.

  18. david f   22 years ago

    "Only Batman should have this technology."

    but then only bad guys would be bats...

    or something like that...

  19. Anonymous   22 years ago

    My feeling is the manufacturers of these devices are laughing all the way to the bank knowing they have produced something totally useless but their customers won't dare ask for refunds.

    As the fella in the story says: "People are gullible, and they have discretionary income."

  20. Jon H   22 years ago

    tzs: "Second, you've got to hope you're dealing with a cheap system that is so mind-brainingly ill-designed there would be no security whatsoever."

    Or, that the security feature is so, uh, 'mind-brainingly' ill-designed as to be unusable unless you only have one of these controllable lights in your town.

    If the security scheme doesn't scale with the number of lights and/or the number of authorized users, then the security won't be used.

  21. Andy D.   22 years ago

    "Just like the guys who make "radar jammers" wchich supposedly give police radar a false reading. Funny how those devices never work when car magazines test them."

    The radar jammers are also illegal. But how about the radar/laser detectors? Are those things effective?

  22. Greg Behrens   22 years ago

    Gort, nichto baradu

  23. zymurgist   22 years ago

    >> Oh, you mean that 90 minute Mini-Cooper ad my
    >> girlfriend made me go to? That movie sucked.

    I didn't see it either. I refuse to shell out my hard earned money for ripoffs of classic movies. I mean, the original had Michael Caine and Noel Coward in it. How do you top that? Short answer: you don't.

  24. zymurgist   22 years ago

    > My feeling is the manufacturers of these
    > devices are laughing all the way to the bank
    > knowing they have produced something totally
    > useless but their customers won't dare ask for
    > refunds.

    Just like the guys who make "radar jammers" wchich supposedly give police radar a false reading. Funny how those devices never work when car magazines test them.

  25. Franklin Harris   22 years ago

    I know what I'm getting from Christmas!

  26. bRYAN   22 years ago

    Just like the guys who make "radar jammers" wchich supposedly give police radar a false reading. Funny how those devices never work when car magazines test them."

    I DON'T KNOW MABYE THEY'RE JUST AS STUPID AS YOU

    MY UNCLE INVENTED SEVERAL THINGS FOR THE DEFENCE DEPARTMENT AS WELL AS THE FIRST JAMMER BOX AND I PERSONALLY TESTED IT ON A RV (25 FOOT LONG AND 9 FOOT HIGH AND WE SPENT ALL DAY IN PERFECT WEATHER TRYING TO BEAT THE JAMMER BOX BUT THE ONLY TIME THE RADER GUN WAS ABLE TO LOCK IN A SPEED WAS WHEN WE ACCEDENTLY UNPLUGED IT

  27. last   22 years ago

    FIRST JAMMER BOX wats the box name

  28. Anonymous   22 years ago

    ps Scorpion xp $500 james all K X + BLINDER Laserjammer M-20 james all laser all the cops have is ka and that 10% of the time I have video of same fools up in Canada testing like 40x jammers only 1 works (sorry 4 the English not first)(o AND THE DONT SELL IT SO NO THE DONT WORK FOR THAT CORP) ALSO FOR ALL OF YOU WITH photo radar PROB GET A anti-photo radar license cover ITS LIKE $20 AND YO DONT HAVE TO PAY ALL BS 1AM RED LITE IKETS (I KNOW I BUCHERD YOUR LANGWICH SORY 2YERS IN SCHOOL IS NOT MACH )+ YOU DONT HAVE TO PAY THE FASTPASS TOLS (I GO ALL THE TIME NOT 1 TIKET) AND ITS LAGET IN usa AND CAN GO LOKK IT UP OR GO TO http://www.jammerstore.com/anti_photo.htm THATS WAT I HAVE

  29. rod   21 years ago

    anyone bought or saw any test results for the new scorpion ka band radar jammer,like to know how good it works,$1,200 price is a lot of money.thanks..rod

  30. Blum David   21 years ago

    EMAIL: krokodilgena1@yahoo.com
    IP: 62.213.67.122
    URL: http://uncircumcised-penis.nonstopsex.org
    DATE: 12/20/2003 08:48:39
    Ideas on Earth are badges of friendship or enmity.

  31. Lieber Katherine   21 years ago

    EMAIL: pamela_woodlake@yahoo.com
    IP: 68.173.7.113
    URL:
    DATE: 01/09/2004 11:26:05
    You do a good work, keep it going

  32. Marcus David   21 years ago

    EMAIL: nospam@nospampreteen-sex.info
    IP: 210.18.158.254
    URL: http://preteen-sex.info
    DATE: 05/19/2004 01:43:51
    After two years in Washington, I often long for the realism and sincerity of Hollywood.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump Says the Courts Have No Business Questioning His Dubious Definition of 'Alien Enemies'

Jacob Sullum | 7.1.2025 5:40 PM

Medicaid Work Requirements Are a Short-Term Fix to a Long-Term Problem

Tosin Akintola | 7.1.2025 4:18 PM

The U.S. Is Closing Every Door on Afghan Allies

Beth Bailey | 7.1.2025 4:00 PM

Trump's Travel Ban Will Not Make Americans Safer

Benjamin Powell | 7.1.2025 3:15 PM

California Enacts Sweeping Exemption to Development-Killing Environmental Law

Christian Britschgi | 7.1.2025 1:10 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!