If I spill, my life ain't worth a nickel.
New at Reason: Cathy Young has the last word on the late Elia Kazan.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Well what is problematic about the hearings (at least as far they looked at Hollywood - the issue is a bit different when it comes to government employees perhaps) is that they were largely designed to investigate the political beliefs of people. Now, maybe some people find communist beliefs to be so dangerous as to require such investigations, but I am of the opinion that political beliefs are the last thing that the government should be investigating, even so-called "dangerous beliefs."
Cathy Young's laudable desire to fairly present both sides often leaves me feeling like I've been on a see-saw, but I generally agree with this piece, which does a decent job of summing up both sides of a complicated issue in a short space. I do wonder: what kind of "aid and comfort" was given to Stalinism by Kazan's denouncers? While trying to insert procommunist messages into movies is stupid just because supporting communism is stupid, isn't that within a movimaker's 1st Amendment rights? Unless he's sending coded messages to those actually performing espionage of course, which I doubt was ever the issue. Was the naming of names before the committee done in public or in private? If in public, that would seem to help confirm that purpose of the hearings was not to investigate but to intimidate....
http://www.adultfriendfindersite.com http://www.adultfriendfindernow.com http://www.adultfriendsite.com http://www.dating999.com http://www.fabuloussextoys.com http://www.lookforukhotels.com http://www.mobilequicksale.com http://www.mobilesandringtones.com http://www.mycasinohome.com http://www.worldwidecasinosearch.com http://www.unbeatablecellphones.com http://www.levitra-express.com http://www.findbookmakers.com http://www.casinos-plus.com http://www.stunningsextoys.com http://www.finddatingsites.com http://www.super-celebs.com http://www.witch-watch.com http://www.tikattack.com http://www.hotelbookingserver.com