How Reasonable Are Your Expecations?
The 2003 edition of the international Privacy and Human Rights survey produced by Privacy International and the Electronic Privacy Information Center has been released.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Kevin,
Licensing of journalists was a big water cooler discussion item when I started in newspapers back in 1980. The theory was that you would be licensed to show that you worked for a "legitimate" news organ (who could have imagined a blog at that time?).
I actually thought the idea might have some merit when I was covering a KKK rally and happened to look closely at the Texas Department of Public Safety press badge that a fellow "reporter" was wearing. Turns out he worked for a Klan magazine. At the time the DPS would issue anyone a press ID who filled out the right forms and submitted a request on a legitimate-looking company letterhead.
Not to stoke the flames of paranoia, but do you ever wonder if hospitals, your doctor, etc. really just disposes of any samples you give/they take?
Some years back we were in a fertility program and while the problem clearly was with my wife, the clinic still wanted a "sample" from me just to rule out that I was infertile. They called a couple of days later and told me that not only was my specimen in fine shape, they would like to keep and use it as a control sample or something like that, and would I give my permission? Young, stupid and flattered, I said yes.
Now I wonder......
I learned from my local talk radio station that the feds up here want a national DNA database with samples from every citizen to be provided. The scary thing was not the proposal itself, but how many people who actually thought this was a GOOD idea. Warren posted a few weeks ago that he would have to impose a moratorium on his Canada-bashing. Sadly, I may have to start.
nm156,
I saw an article in "In These Times" in 1999, about a poll that said a majority of Americans supported a licensing system for journalists, to make sure they were "fair and balanced." So I'm not surprised at anything I hear from the sheeple.
Of course, a lot of it has to do with the answers the poll is designed to get, and the way the questions are asked. I hope that explains these horrible results, and that if the questions were asked a different way people would say "Hell, no!" But it's still a shame that only people who are critical, contrarian, or ideologically committed enough to know their own minds, are capable of resisting the slanting of these things.