No Quiet Man, No Problem
New at Reason: Did Stalin want to bump off the Duke as a favor to Tarzan? Chuck Freund asks the tough question.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Is it just me? Or is anybody else disturbed by the 'Peoplefication' of Reason?
e.g. http://www.reason.com/hod/kh073103.shtml
Yes, lately Reason has gone to pot!
e.g. http://www.reason.com/links/links071103.shtml
Actually, the odd idea of Stalin wanting to bump John Wayne off as a favor to Tarzan is even more odd than Freund may know. There is actually a novel in the Tarzan series -- Tarzan the Invincible, I believe -- which which Stalin appears at the beginning as a character. He sends an agent to Africa to kill Tarzan, who is (naturally) inhibiting Soviet subversion and various communist plots throughout the jungle. Could this have been some kind of inside joke on Edgar Rice Burroughs' part? Or just a coincidence? No way would People be up to the task of finding out, but I'm sure Reason has what it takes to discover the truth.
nothing stands in the way of reason's search for the truth: Tarzan the Invincible appeared in 1931, and is not all that likely to be burrough's comment on stalin's (reported) order to assassinate john wayne some 20 years later, an event linked by me to johnny weissmuller's flagging career in 2003. let people mag top that.
There you go, ruining a perfectly good and silly comment by actually looking up publication dates.
No fair.
The Duke would have wiped the floor with that pinko.