NY Times Rejects My Advice, Again
The Paper of Record, still sorting out the Jayson Blair mess, has decided to name a ?public editor,? which is a non-Swedish way of saying ?ombudsman.? As I argue in the August issue of Reason, the ombudsman concept was designed as a way for murky, state-owned bureaucracies to throw a bone to alienated customers, or to sweep public relations problems under the rug. Enron has an ombudsman, Southwest Airlines does not. Monopolist newspapers have been embracing the concept for the past 35 years or so, and the Times? long-standing refusal to jump on this journalistic bandwagon was always a signal, to me at least, that it was too busy competing to mollify the gatekeeper establishment. Oh well.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Ombudsman" looks to me like it means a Buddhist marijuana pusher.
Please accept my application to be Reason's ombudsman, should it ever become a murky, state-owned bureacracy. "Fair and balanced" would be my motto.
hey Lefty,
sure -- you can have that position. it's paid the free market rate.... 🙂
only if i can be minister of secular affairs in the ashcroft f?hrerschaft
and dammit, what happened to the Twins? grrrr. this means that the Sux (no Sic!) will win the central. their radio guys make that yankee guy seem cool and normal. please don't submit us to that! c'mon Twins!! ('cuz KC and my Indians never had a chance)
drf
Well, if the Boston Globe's Ombudsperson representative of the position, they'll spend all their time dealing with important issues like telling readers how to tell which edition they're getting (no, seriously:
http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/202/oped/Inquiring_readers_want_to_know+.shtml)
and ignore the little stuff like pervasive lefty bias....
I think the Twins are toast. Pitching, which should have been their strong suit, isn't holding up (same with the Cards - groan). I'll pull for anybody but the Socks.
The bright news is that the St. Paul Saints are leading the Northern League. Last week they pinch hit the 83 year old Minnie Minoso, setting a record of some sort.
What cycle is it now, pervasive lefty bias or pervasive righty bias? Which paper is this again?
I've gotten myself all confused trying to keep track...