Hands Off My Hemisphere!
I thought Microsoft trying to patent a scrolling menu for video-on-demand was pretty brazen. They've got nothing on Honeywell, which is claiming a trademark on, well… round. Round thermostats, that is. I'm actually all in favor: companies in every industry should start snapping up the basic geometric shapes, forcing competitors to design strange Dali-esque alternatives. (Via boingboing.)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
yet more news from the runnaway intellectual property state
Hey, if Harley-Davidson can trademark motorcyle engines that run badly, why not this, too?
Warren, did you know that the octagonal shape of the stop sign is the intellectual property of the state -- runaway, or otherwise?
Hey, moron, did you know that the ROUND presidential seal is also the intellectual property of the state -- runaway, or otherwise?
If people can patent the letters "G", "PG", and letter-number combinations "PG-13" and "NC-17" - but not "X" - then I will simply believe just about almost anything.
Careful! "XXX" is already patented.
Cue Tim Robbins in The Hudsucker Proxy: "It's for kids!"
Whatever happened to knobs?
If I may, allow me to call attention to my defence of Honeywell.
Colby- you might have a point if this were a patent case. But it ain't; it's a trademark case. The internal design isn't at issue; the cover shape is. I'm not denying that design elements can be trademarked... but, come on, round? They own a patent on the insides, great. But unlike patents, trademarks don't expire, giving the company what amounts to a perpetual monopoly on the form, whether or not the internal configuration is the same or not. So, with all due respect, I think this IS one of those IP jokes.
EMAIL: nospam@nospampreteen-sex.info
IP: 203.162.3.147
URL: http://preteen-sex.info
DATE: 05/21/2004 05:39:34
There are no weird people - some just require more understanding.