"Big Hiking" Enters the Ring
USA Today reports that the outdoor recreation industry has begun to throw its "economic and political weight around," opposing, among other things, roadbuilding in state and federal wilderness areas. Reading between the lines slightly, it looks as though part of the impetus for the roadbuilding is to preempt Congressional designs to establish "permanent wilderness protection," which would preclude future development. I wonder if "follow-the-money" types are going to start accusing environmentalist politicians of being "in REI's pocket?"
Sadly, this new bit of nakedly self-interested lobbying is probably a good thing on net, in that it at least counterbalances the equally nakedly self interested lobbying of timber companies. Lots of roads on federal land constitute little more than a massive subsidy to the logging industry, since the roads built on the taxpayer's dime often cost more than the value of the timber to which they grant access.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?