Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Channeling Saddam

Tim Cavanaugh | 3.5.2003 2:58 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

From the department of wtf: CBS' on-air "translator" for the Saddam interview was a SAG member faking an Arabic accent. Hope he's not a method actor…(groan).

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: OK, Now it's Time to Ban Cloning...

Tim Cavanaugh
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (9)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Steve   23 years ago

    "Look fooor the union laabeeelll,..."

  2. Anonymous   23 years ago

    If they had used a British accent, we would have thought, oh good, BBC did the heavy lifting.

  3. James Merritt   23 years ago

    The use of an accent strikes me as cheesy, but I have always wondered why broadcast translators are so seldom chosen for their vocal similarities to the person, whose speech is being translated. As an extreme, yet common, example: Dismayingly often, men in translation have the voice of WOMEN and vice versa! It seems to me that some effort should be made to find and use a translator or actor whose voice matched, as near as we could determine, what a given public figure would sound like, if speaking fluent (unaccented?) English.

    Major network news is infotainment; these days, that is a given. That being said, the question becomes, is the "tainment" part there to help you better appreciate and understand the "info"? Or is it there to distract you from or twist your perception of the "info" (or lack of it)? In other words, does the embellishment tip the piece in the direction of news/journalism, or propaganda/advertising? I think that appropriate-sounding, translated "voices" for newsmakers tends to achieve the former.

  4. joe   23 years ago

    Does Saddam speak Arabic in an accent that is foreign to his listeners in Iraq? No? Then his translator shouldn't speak English in an accent that is foreign to his listeners in America. "He" should sound as comfortable with the language as he did in the original, or the meaning of his speech is distorted.

  5. Dr. Evil   23 years ago

    So how would we know Saddam is Evil without an Evil foriegn Accent?

  6. david f   23 years ago

    well, listening to henry kissinger speak english with that awful accent, then hearing his awful (english) accent in german, well, you got something there.

    maybe they did this to highlight even further that this guy, sa-ddam (like bush the first said it), really is "the other" or foreign or some such??? no. that wouldn't do. danny rather-not wouldn't like to boost the current prez by helping make SH seem even more foreign...

    or even better: since CBS et al toe the "european is better line", maybe the accent was to allow them the feeling that americans can't speak other languages, so it must be foreign to be accurate?

    still, peter seller's inspecteur closeau is the best accent of all time...

    cheers,
    drf

  7. Anonymous   23 years ago

    I'm with Joe on this one. I'm guessing the accent was employed to add a sense of context; but that puts context above content. The translation should be accurate and honest--and in a perfect mid-west Nebraska accent--otherwise; it pretends to make the meaning of the words as foreign as the language.

  8. natebradley   23 years ago

    So I guess the solution is to get an Iraqi immigrant whose accent has faded ALMOST to the point of imperceptibility. That way it wouldn't offend the people who think we ought to hear an American-sounding voice; it wouldn't offend the people who think the translator ought to use his natural voice, and it wouldn't offend the people who think we ought to hear a genuine accent if we hear one at all. Suggestion to participants in this debate: turn down the volume and opt for closed captioning next time.

  9. Berman Jesse   21 years ago

    EMAIL: pamela_woodlake@yahoo.com
    IP: 62.213.67.122
    URL: http://www.pills-for-penis.com
    DATE: 01/20/2004 12:19:35
    Misfortune shows those who are not really friends.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

'We Are Not Investigating' the Shooting of Renee Good, the Deputy Attorney General Says

Jacob Sullum | 1.19.2026 3:05 PM

Trump's 'Great Healthcare Plan' Has Promise but Should Add More Freedom for Americans

J.D. Tuccille | 1.19.2026 7:00 AM

This 1996 Law Protects Free Speech Online. Does It Apply to AI Too?

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | From the February/March 2026 issue

Brickbat: Don't Look Down Under

Charles Oliver | 1.19.2026 4:00 AM

How the FCC Became the Speech Police

Jacob Sullum | From the February/March 2026 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks