Edited for Your Protection
Leading scientific journals announce that they will omit data from research papers which might be of use to terrorists. What such deadly info might look like is an admitted tough call. One expert says he'll use a version of the obscenity test.
"You know it when you see it," said Ronald Atlas, president of the American Society of Microbiology.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In a suprise move, Microsoft announces they will pull all future copies of "Flight Simulator" from the shelves, citing fears of possible use by terrorists.
Don't forget chemistry and physics classes...
And math. Can't make a decent bomb without math.
This month's Crypto-Gram has a good essay of the security you get from real security versus the security provided by secrets. It's one of Schneier's favorite topics.
So does that mean Academics will need security clearence before they subject research to peer review?
Most Americans are too ignorant of math and science to know what to do with the information anyway.