Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Surviving Picasso

Jesse Walker | 2.4.2003 10:48 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

I suppose you could consider this a testament to the power of art.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Outraged at Their Own Verdict

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (5)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Mark Harden   22 years ago

    I suppose you could consider this a testament to the power of art.

    No, more a testament to the widspread inability of people to comprehend the distinction between the deliberate targeting of civilians (as at Guernica and in suicide bombings) and the unfortunate and unintentional possibility of civilian casualties risked in the noble purpose of liberating suffering Iraqis from the despotic oppression of Saddam.

  2. Anonymous   22 years ago

    The "possibility" of civilian casualties? If someone's being delusional here, Mark, it's you.

  3. Kevin Carson   22 years ago

    Mark:

    Is this what the neocons mean by "moral clarity"? Here's a tip for you: just because the state SAYS its motivations are noble, doesn't mean it's TRUE.

    Look at a good history of the role of the CIA, the School of the Americas, and various other components of the jackbooted National Security State, in propping up just about every military thug and death squad regime since World War II. I strongly recommend Killing Hope, by William Blum. It's a case by case analysis, VERY heavily footnoted.

    In the case of both Serbia and Iraq, U.S. forces deliberately targeted water treatment facilities and the rest of the infrastructure that civilians needed to keep alive. The neocon ideologues who cheerlead the perpetual warfare state explicitly said, "Deliberately killing civilians is beyond the pale, but deliberately destroying the infrastructure that keeps them from starving is copacetic."

    The state may SAY it's just working for sweetness and light, but what it's really about is "a boot stamping on a human face."

  4. Warren   22 years ago

    I don't see why they want to cover that piece up. It's only a depiction of "Destruction, Suffering, and Hope". It's not like is shows anything as offensive as say an exposed female breast. - Sheesh

  5. Kevin Carson   22 years ago

    It's actually got a female breast in it, Warren (not counting the cows). But I figure Ass-crap would have got around to covering that up anyway. Now if you could just work in a calico cat...

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Two Courts Have Ruled Against Trump's Tariffs—but Not for the Same Reasons

Jack Nicastro | 5.30.2025 1:30 PM

Civil Rights Groups Say Immigrants Are Being Denied Legal Access at Detention Centers

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.30.2025 1:16 PM

Congress Must Vote on Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 5.30.2025 12:10 PM

What J.D. Vance Gets Wrong About Judicial Deference to Executive Power

Damon Root | 5.30.2025 11:42 AM

Marco Rubio Sure Has a Weird Definition of Free Speech

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 10:53 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!