Ludd At First Sight
The Washington Post delivers an early Valentine to Nicols Fox, author of a new book from Island Press, Against the Machine: The Hidden Luddite Tradition in Literature, Art and Individual Lives, with a laudatory and uncritical profile. Fox, who primly congratulates herself and inconveniences any friend who might want to reach her with her refusal to own an answering machine or cell phone, thinks that in our thoughtless embrace of technological gadgetry we ignore, Post writer Ken Ringle says, "the absences -- the spiritual and aesthetic values we've allowed to slip away almost unnoticed in our collective embrace of machinery from the steam engine to the Palm Pilot." For example, she realized her coffee grinder's electronic clamor was setting her all on edge, so she now grinds by hand. Ned Ludd is smiling from his low-tech, high-labor heaven.
She is full of complaints about how the choices other people make are clearly -- to her -- making their lives worse. People like Ms. Fox who delight in hanging clothes out to dry on the line and, who knows, strapping on a wooden yoke to plow their fields, should live long and prosper. But I'm always a little set on edge myself by the whiff of Big Brotherism that hovers around writing dedicated to telling most people that they are really, if they but stopped to think about it, going about this life business in entirely the wrong manner. Fox is so sure of her righteousness, as portrayed here, that she willfully ignores that some people might actually want to be able to reach and be reached by phone while away from home, and are willing to pay the price in terms of time spent recharging batteries on their cell phone. Fox claims she's all about opening people's eyes to the fact that they can choose not to use technology. That she even thinks this is news to most people evinces a lack of respect for her fellow man far more aggravating than the lamentable fact that the electric dishwasher (which I don't own, by the way) robs us of "the only interesting aspect of dishwashing, which is how to get off that piece of cheese that's stuck to the plate."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
No law requires one to own, or if owner one to use a dishwasher, a cellular phone or an automobile. You can even find areas where outhouses and dug wells, sometimes even in close proximity, are not opposed.
As one who has both toted and pumped water, raised chickens and used an outhouse, they are welcome to my share of the simple life.
Argh. Why are those "live simple" advocates always trying to convince others of the "wrongness" of their ways? Gimme all the cell phones, PDAs, voice-mail, computers, dishwashers, grinders, Tivos, etc, I can handle!
I was so revolted by this sanctimonious twit that I sent a letter to the editor.
Since there is precious little chance that this lady's views will ever be well-sold in the marketplace of ideas, it's probably not too bad that she's reminding us of, say, what you might get out of hanging our clothes on a line, or, uh, making bowls by hand, or, whatever. I don't think Maytag or Corning is trembling in their boots.
Some people will read this and make poor decisions based on it, but I doubt that they will make them several times.
But she does sound like she's prone to non-rationality, which bugs me. I would prefer to see people encouraged to think things through and be rational.
Yes, she's a twit.
All these people need to do is go camping for a month or so. Sure, it's fun at first, but after a week or so of fending for yourself in the wild it gets old. This would be especially convincing if it rains or snows during the trip.
I think it's very educational for people to try doing things the way they were done in the past. However I think the net result will be a greater appreciation for the simpliciy and ease of living in our modern technology assisted lifestyle, rather than a nostalgia for or return to the lifestyles of history.
2 hours a day gathering cow chips to cook the daily meal might convert a few followers of Ned.
no answering machine? she obviously doesn't have to pound the pavement and wait for return calls about interviews 🙂