Historical Note
When I wrote my column on the Trent Lott controversy last week, I intended to include a link to the Dixiecrat platform of 1948. Unfortunately, I couldn't find a copy online.
Thanks to The Smoking Gun, I can link to it now.
Question: Why was this platform adopted in Oklahoma City? The Dixiecrats weren't even on the ballot in Oklahoma. And the Democratic convention they walked out on took place in Philadelphia. Any political historians out there with an answer?
UPDATE: So it turns out the reason is pretty simple: This isn't the national Dixiecrat platform. It is, as the Smoking Gun page has been revised to explain, the platform of "the Oklahoma branch," which presumably cooked up a document of its own while it should have been trying to get onto the ballot.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm not sure why the Oklahoma City address or why the election committee was based there. My (dim) memory of history tells me the actual convention was held in Birmingham, Alabama just a few days after the Philadelphia walkout. Maybe the platform and nomination was drafted in Oklahoma by these individuals and presented in Birmingham?
Thanks for pointing that out. Would love to find out more.