Libel for Trouble
Australia's top court has decided that country's libel laws should span the globe.
As a result Dow Jones must stand trial in Australia over a piece Barron's did on a Melbourne mining executive. The exec says he was defamed, and it is much easier to bring such a case outside the U.S.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Perhaps the US should have it's laws span the globe as well. Then our courts can strike down French bans on owning or selling Nazi memorabilia on free speech grounds, etc.
The notion that any nation (or agglomeration of nations, such as the U.N.) has the arrogance to presume that its laws somehow span the globe is so laughable I won't even comment further on it.
I'd like to apologize for my country's High Court, which shall be whipt and sent to bed without any supper.