Voucher Victory
In April 1997, the Arizona legislature passed a $500 tax credit for donations to private scholarship programs. Predictably, the Arizona Education Association, the Arizona School Board Association, People for the American Way, and other special-interest groups allied with the educational establishment sued. "We think it's a voucher [plan] in disguise," then-AEA President Kay Lybeck told REASON. "But I must admit that it is well written and it will be difficult to counter." (See "Educating Arizona," July 1997.)
Lybeck was right, at least on those last two points. This January, the Arizona Supreme Court deemed the tax credit constitutional. The "primary beneficiaries of this credit are taxpayers who contribute to [the scholarship funds] and parents who might otherwise be deprived of an opportunity to make meaningful decisions about their children's educations, and the children themselves," said the court. It also had the temerity to rule that a tax credit, which allows a person to keep more of his own income, is not public spending.
Arizona's educrats are not amused. "I think it's unfortunate that the state has decided to find ways to support parochial and private education," says Penny Kotterman, current president of the AEA, which is pondering an appeal to the United States Supreme Court. "The net effect of this legislation is less dollars into the general fund," Kotterman laments.
But bad news for the Grand Canyon state's public schools may well be good news for its students. "We can help innumerable kids now," says Jack McVaugh of the Arizona School Choice Trust, a foundation that plans to pass out 500 scholarships next fall. McVaugh expects the court decision to spur more donations. "Our goal" he says, "is to [help] every child in Arizona who wants to get out of a public school-- or wherever they are--have that opportunity."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
xhfghdg