Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Data: The Price of Controls

Brian Doherty | From the April 1998 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

President Clinton crowed in his State of the Union address about the wonders of shrinking government, brought about by his rule. And indeed, discretionary budget outlays (which don't include big entitlements like Social Security and Medicare) have been shrinking since Clinton took office. But a less-obvious aspect of government is growing apace. After a dip in the late '80s, the cost of federal regulations to the American public is rising, jumping from $642 billion a year in 1993 to a projected $721 billion by 2000, based on U.S. Small Business Administration calculations.

Regulations such as Superfund, anti-dumping laws, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and ethanol subsidies might not cost the government much in direct outlays. But they can cost citizens a lot. "The old pork barrel…at least had to be paid for with tax dollars or deficit spending," writes the Brookings Institution's Pietro Nivola in the Winter 1998 Brookings Review. "The favoritism was explicit, concrete (often literally) and visibly priced….The new [regulatory] system is murkier. Its contents stretch far beyond earmarked appropriations…to a stack of selective legal strictures that appear budget-neutral…and that are partly in the custody…of unaccountable private attorneys general."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reasonable Doubts: Tripp Wire

Brian Doherty is a senior editor at Reason and author of Ron Paul's Revolution: The Man and the Movement He Inspired (Broadside Books).

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (0)

Latest

It's the Economy, Not the East Wing, Stupid

Robby Soave | 11.5.2025 8:35 PM

Federal Prosecutors Flesh Out Their Case Against James Comey. It Still Looks Shaky.

Jacob Sullum | 11.5.2025 5:10 PM

New York Voters Say Yes to Faster Housing Approvals

Christian Britschgi | 11.5.2025 4:45 PM

America's Longest Government Shutdown Shows Why We Must Free Air Traffic Control from Politics

Robert Poole | 11.5.2025 3:55 PM

Trump's Attorney Concedes: His Legal Theory Would Let a President Tax Foreign Cars To Combat Climate Change

Eric Boehm | 11.5.2025 3:40 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300