Data: A Cost-Ineffective Drug War
One sign of a successful law-enforcement war on drugs should be rising prices for the outlawed substances. If federal agents are successfully sealing the border and police efforts are genuinely making trafficking riskier, drugs should become more expensive. As the price data below for cocaine indicate, it hasn't worked out that way. (Similar trends can also be observed for other illegal drugs, such as marijuana, LSD, and heroin.)
Indeed, because the prices have not been adjusted for inflation, their seeming stability actually masks a decrease in cost. Over the same period, the government estimates that demand for drugs has remained relatively constant. In 1990, the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse reported 0.9 percent of people aged 12 and older had used cocaine in the previous month. In 1991, the percentage peaked at 1 percent, before declining to 0.7 for 1992-1995.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
cyjjc