Wait Problems
The hazards of backyard "wetlands"
Floridian Lloyd Wilson wanted to build a home on a lot he owns. Then he found that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers had designated 260 square feet of his property—the size of a large room—as wetlands. The Army Corps made Wilson wait more than nine months before letting construction proceed.
A property owner who has any amount of land that has been designated as wetlands must navigate a public-notice-and-comment period, hire consultants to negotiate with regulators, and wait for the Army Corps to consult with as many as four other agencies before deciding whether to allow development. Environmental attorney Virginia S. Albrecht and environmental consultant Bernard N. Goode reviewed all of the Army Corps' 1992 applications to build on property that had been designated as wetlands. They found that one-fourth of the applications had wetlands of less than a quarter acre and just under half had less than one acre of wetlands. The average property owner waited 373 days to get through the permit process.
Albrecht and Goode also discovered that 61 percent of the 1992 applications were withdrawn. While the Army Corps may deny only 5 percent of all applications, "The plain fact is that in most cases a withdrawn application, like a denied application, means that the applicant cannot go forward with his or her project."
Meanwhile, reports a recent Competitive Enterprise Institute study, the United States is actually creating more wetlands than are being destroyed. For 1994, several Agriculture Department programs are expected to restore an estimated 167,000 acres of wetlands—representing a potential net gain of 27,000 wetland acres. In that context, penalizing property owners like Wilson with expensive delays because of tiny "wetlands" on their land seems both unjust and unnecessary.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Wait Problems."
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?