Code Words
It just got a little easier for American computer companies to sell secret codes. A July 17 agreement between the Bush administration and the Software Publishers Association loosens export controls on a burgeoning technology: cryptography, the ciphering (encryption) and deciphering (decryption) of messages in code.
Cryptography already has thousands of uses, from four-digit personal identification numbers for automatic teller machines to complicated strings of code that financial institutions use to transmit money over telephone lines. And the Software Publishers Association estimates that annual sales of encryption software could top $5 billion within five years.
Before the July agreement, the National Security Agency used 40-year-old regulations, which defined cryptography as a weapon, to effectively prohibit any American company from exporting hardware or software that used cryptography. Under those regulations, the NSA has prohibited the export of antivirus software and commonly available computer programs. Since American firms get more than half their sales from foreign customers, the NSA's controls shut a state-of-the-art industry out of profitable markets.
After last year's Soviet collapse, U.S. allies revoked their own bans on cryptography exports. But the NSA, citing national security concerns, continued to review (and routinely deny) export requests from American firms.
After Rep. Mel Levine (D–Calif.) introduced legislation that would have allowed the export of any commercially available encryption programs, the NSA agreed to a compromise. It approved two encryption codes licensed by RSA Data Security, a Redwood City, California, firm. Any company that wants to export other codes still has to get permission from the NSA. Industry officials can also meet with the NSA twice a year to request more-liberal export policies.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Code Words."
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?