A Penny Saved
Why do people find it hard to get off welfare? One reason is that current laws require a client to spend most of his or her savings in order to receive welfare, and they cut welfare allowances if a recipient's savings increase.
Michael Sherraden, an associate professor of social work at Washington University in St. Louis, notes that asset accumulation is one of the reasons why the richest Americans get and remain wealthy. The richest 20 percent of Americans earn 46 percent of the country's income but own 75 percent of the wealth. By contrast, the poorest 20 percent of Americans earn 4 percent of the income but own only 0.1 percent of the wealth.
For generations, liberals and socialists have attempted to reduce this gap between the rich and the poor by redistributing income. But Sherraden, in a paper published by the Progressive Policy Institute, a centrist Democratic think tank based in Washington, D.C., suggests that low-income Americans might be better able to permanently escape poverty by building assets. Accumulating assets, Sherraden notes, "leads people to behave in productive ways: planning ahead, deferring consumption, working harder, and saving."
To encourage asset building, Sherraden proposes that the federal government create "Individual Development Accounts" (IDAs). These savings accounts, like Individual Retirement Accounts, would be voluntary, and the earnings and interest in them would be exempt from federal taxes.
Sherraden proposes four types of IDAs—for housing, college education, self-employment, and retirement. Sherraden suggests that the federal government match the contributions low-income workers make to their IDAs, in some cases at a greater than dollar-for-dollar rate. By creating accounts, Sherraden contends, the federal government would make "more Americans stakeholders in our free-enterprise economy."
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "A Penny Saved."
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?