Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Securing Future Retirees

Rick Henderson | From the December 1989 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

A proposal before Congress would require the Social Security Administration to do the politically unthinkable—consider at least partially privatizing the system. Rep. John Porter (R.–Ill.) has sponsored HR 3083, which would remove current Social Security surpluses from budget deficit calculations and force the SSA to study investing Social Security surpluses in the private sector.

Porter wants to improve the prospects for future retirees as fewer workers pay Social Security taxes and more elderly Americans demand benefits. His eventual goal is to allow workers to make Social Security payments into their own private retirement accounts, while simultaneously reducing their claims on the Social Security system.

The federal government has been using current Social Security surpluses to offset the overall budget deficit. Last year alone, the Social Security surpluses reduced the federal deficit by $56 billion. This practice is scheduled to end in fiscal 1993, but Porter's bill would stop it now.

The bill also requires the SSA to conduct a study to recommend "redirection of FICA and SECA taxes to individual retirement accounts or annuities or other retirement income arrangements." From these recommendations, Porter plans to propose legislation that would permit each worker paying Social Security taxes to own his or her contributions. Workers would each establish an Individual Social Security Retirement Account (ISSRA), which would receive their accumulated payroll taxes.

Each year, Porter says, "we would 'refund' into workers' ISSRAs the portion of their FICA taxes not needed to cover current retirement benefits, and [reduce] each worker's claim on the Social Security Trust Fund accordingly.…By 2050, the new system would be completely vested and funded." Individuals could invest the accumulated funds in a variety of public or private savings choices.

This is not a voluntary retirement program; it is a forced savings plan. Workers and employers must pay into the system. But Robert Gustafson, Porter's legislative assistant, said that "the basis of the plan is that all people who put money in [the Social Security system] will get the same benefits they are promised" when they enter the workforce.

Those who support privately investing Social Security taxes assert that it would boost the economy and offer future retirees a better deal than Social Security promises. Harvard economist Martin Feldstein estimates that investing all Social Security taxes in the private sector would increase GNP by 19 percent. Attorney Peter Ferrara, who has written extensively about Social Security, has calculated that a minimum-wage worker investing in a private retirement plan would earn twice Social Security's current payout.

Even though Porter says his proposal has received wide support outside Congress, so far HR 3083 has only four cosponsors. Gustafson reports that the bill has been presented to the House Ways and Means Committee. He hopes hearings will take place before the end of the year.

This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Securing Future Retirees."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brief Review

Rick Henderson
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (0)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!