California Pushes to Legalize Bitcoin

Isokivi \ WikimediaIsokivi \ Wikimedia

A bill unanimously passed by the California State Assembly last week moves to end legal confusion and make Bitcoin “lawful money.” AB 129’s fate now rests with the State Senate.

Uncertainty still plagues Bitcoin’s relationship with law enforcement. Individual Bitcoin users generally don’t struggle to buy or sell goods in the U.S., but Bitcoin exchanges and services have had to deal with confused, hostile regulators. In May 2013, California’s Department of Financial Institutions threatened Bitcoin Foundation with fines and jail time for operating a money transmission service in violation of the state's financial code

Because of the legal muddle, some Bitcoin services are considering moving overseas.

The California bill is a step toward legal clarity for Bitcoin services. The “Bill Analysis” reads:  

This bill makes clarifying changes to current law to ensure that various forms of alternative currency such as digital currency, points, coupons, or other objects of monetary value do not violate the law when those methods are used for the purchase of goods and services or the transmission of payments. 

Under the bill, increasingly popular alternative currencies like Litecoin, Peercoin, Namecoin, and even Dogecoin, would be on the same legal footing as Bitcoin.

Banking and Finance Chairman of the Assembly Roger Dickinson first introduced AB 129 in January. CoinDesk reports it “is now roughly halfway through the process to become a law.” Once passed through the Senate Policy Committee and the Senate Fiscal Committee it will reach the Senate Floor. If the bill passes the Senate, the final decision rests with the California governor.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • SweatingGin||

    The bitcoin foundation cease and desist letter was particularly egregious, as it was quite obvious to anyone but a beureaucrat that they weren't an exchange.

  • James Anderson Merritt||

    I guess I will have to read the law, but, under the US Constitution, how can any State declare whether anything other than gold, silver, and US currency is "lawful money" at all? People can already barter, and can demand any payment they want as a condition of trade. The California law would seem unnecessary and irrelevant. But then, aren't most of them in the Golden State?

  • RishJoMo||

    BitCoins are jsut cool liek that and they know it.

  • cheap kits||

    BitCoins is cool but the government don't have enough power to supervise it, so the government have to kill the bitcoins.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.