Bank of England Not Going for Quantitative Easing Despite Departing Chief’s Support

QE P UReason 24/7The Federal Reserve may be in sequel mode on quantitative easing, but the Bank of England isn’t convinced more is necessary.

From RTT News:

Policymakers of the Bank of England are likely to sit tight on quantitative easing even if the outgoing Governor Mervyn King insists on additional stimulus to help the economic recovery gain traction.

At the final meeting of King as governor of BoE, a majority of policymakers will possibly cite positive economic development since the last meeting as a reason to adopt a "wait and see" stance.

The Monetary Policy Committee is widely expected to retain its key interest rate at a record low 0.50 percent and the size of quantitative easing at GBP 375 billion. The announcement is due at 7.00 am ET.

King along with Paul Fisher and David Miles sought more stimulus over the last four months, but majority rejected citing impact on currency, better economic growth and risk to inflation.

Good riddance to bad rubbish?

Follow these stories and more at Reason 24/7 and don't forget you can e-mail stories to us at and tweet us at @reason247.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • The Late P Brooks||

    Strangely enough, the Bloombergistas have of late apparently succumbed to the horrifying suspicion Bernanke isn't going to be able to coax the genie back into the bottle without a messy struggle.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties