Democrats and Republicans Unite to Protect the Right to Browse Cigars

A bipartisan bill with more than 200 co-sponsors in the House would prevent the Food and Drug Administration from regulating "traditional and premium cigars" under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Roll Call notes that the bill's supporters include "political opposites" ranging from Pete Sessions (R-Texas) and Allen West (R-Fla.) on the right to Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.) and Steve Israel (D-N.Y.) on the left. Cigar makers and tobacconists worry that FDA regulation would impose onerous burdens, including warning labels on packages, a ban on phone sales, prohibition of flavored cigars, and a requirement that cigars be kept away from customers in a separate room accessible only to employees (which would spell the end of cigar shopping as we know it). They argue that the tobacco control law was mainly aimed at curtailing underage smoking and therefore should not be applied to products that teenagers rarely consume. The Traditional Cigar Manufacturing and Small Business Jobs Preservation Act applies to unfiltered products wrapped in tobacco leaf that weigh more than six pounds per 1,000 cigars.

Ordinarily I am leery of bipartisanship, special favors for particular industries, and legislation that promises to save and/or create jobs. But several factors count in this bill's favor: 1) It aims to block absurd regulations that would arbitrarily interfere with adults' freedom in the name of protecting children, 2) it is opposed by Altria (a.k.a. Philip Morris) and the major anti-smoking groups, the same coalition that gave us FDA regulation of tobacco products, and 3) the arguments against it are fatuous. The Los Angeles Times, for instance, worries that "many high school and college students mistakenly believe that cigars are not very dangerous." Leaving aside the not insignificant point that cigars are not, in fact, "very dangerous," why would regulation by the FDA, the same agency charged with ensuring that drugs are "safe and effective," make cigars seem more rather than less hazardous?  

I noted the cigar industry's worries about FDA regulation last December. As you might expect, Michael Bloomberg's New York is ahead of the FDA when it comes to stopping kids from smoking cigarettes by barring adults from buying flavored cigars.

[Thanks to Bill Godshall for the tip.]

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • ||

    The problem is that this bill seeks to carve out exceptions for just one segment of the tobacco industry, instead of saying ALL tobacco products should be exempt from this bad law.

  • Cdr Lytton||

    No kidding. Remove the existing legislation that gives the FDA authority to make these regulations, either for cigars or tobacco products generally.

  • anon||

    I disagree. Remove the FDA. Problem solved.

  • Cdr Lytton||

    To clarify, instead of exempting "large and premium" cigars, just curtail the existing law to apply only to whatever they want to keep regulated. Enumerated powers vs enumerated rights.

  • widget||

    I began smoking cigars when I was 11. I quit when I was 13. My cigar experience began by selling them at the local fairgrounds. I kept at least one for myself as did most of the other 11 yo merchants. We smoked the pocketted cigars in the trees overlooking the midway. Climbing trees ended at age 13, when girls come into focus. Cigars? Do boys exist anymore?

  • RBS||

    Did you also tie an onion to your belt?

  • jason||

    This is really funny that smoking become the election agenda.

  • Pi Guy||

    Smoke 'em if you got 'em, Boys!

  • Abdul||

    I can't help but wonder if the plutocrat congress had some self-interest in protecting stogies. There's a reason why there's several cigar shops and bars on K street.

  • Coeus||

    It was a bipartisan bill to restrict government control. Of course it was passed in self interest. It's the only time these fucks give a shit.

  • John Thacker||

    Well, yes, cigars are things liked by the right sort of people. The government is only supposed to ban low class things.

  • DantoRang||

    Dude really knows which way is up, Woiw.

  • JW||

    3) the arguments against it are fatuous.

    You don't say.

    We can eliminate this reason, since this is the common denominator of every nanny state adventure.

  • Rich||

    cigars are not, in fact, "very dangerous,"


  • Mr. FIFY||

    Rs and Ds, working together.

    I smell a trap.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.