Peter Suderman | July 20, 2011
If you had to rank Stupid Government
Programs in order of stupidity, the CLASS Act would surely rank
among the stupidest. The Community Living Assistance Service and
Supports (CLASS) Act is a long-term care insurance program and
quasi-entitlement attached the last year’s health care overhaul
despite the fact that every reputable analyst deemed it unworkable
and unsustainable. Medicare’s own chief actuary has said that
there’s “a very serious risk” the program will be “unsustainable.”
According to the Congressional Budget Office, the fiscal bleeding
is scheduled to start just
beyond the ten-year budget window, at which point “the program
would add to future federal budget deficits in a large and growing
fashion.” But because the program starts collecting premiums right
away and paying benefits down the road, the CBO was required to
score it as reducing the deficit in the first decade, which is why
it got grafted onto ObamaCare. Without CLASS, the health care law
loses about $70 billion of its alleged deficit reduction.
The program is so stupid that even Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has been forced to acknowledge its design flaws: In February, she told members of Congress that the Obama administration “very much share[s] the concerns that have been expressed that, as written into the law, the framework of the program was not sustainable.” It doesn’t even meet the act’s own sustainability requirements: “We determined pretty quickly that it would not meet the requirement that the act be self-sustaining and not rely on taxpayer assistance,” Sebelius has said.
So as it stands, the program is an unworkable, unsustainable deficit-hiking fiscal mess, and the Obama administration clearly knows it. What then does the administration want to do about it? Spend taxpayer money branding and advertising the program, it seems. In a letter to Sebelius, GOP Sens. Richard Shelby and John Thune point to a request that HHS has put in for a quote for outside contractor assistance with “Developing a Strategic Brand for CLASS.”
Obama’s own fiscal commission last year recommended shuttering the program completely. And one of the best parts about the Gang of Six bipartisan budget compromise released yesterday is that it follows suit by closing CLASS for good. The administration doesn’t need a “strategic brand” for CLASS. It needs a stop work order.
Reason needs your support. Please donate today!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
(310) 367-6109
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|7.20.11 @ 12:54PM|#
So as it stands, the program is an unworkable, unsustainable deficit-hiking fiscal mess
In other words, it's just like every other government program.
T|7.20.11 @ 1:01PM|#
Just because something is proven not to work doesn't mean you can't make money selling it. Advertising is eesential in pushing your non-effective product.
some guy|7.20.11 @ 4:20PM|#
Just look at Windows.
|7.20.11 @ 1:09PM|#
The acronyms have to be a deliberate insult to our intelligence at this point. These clowns can't seriously believe calling this piece of shit a "CLASS act" makes it easier to swallow. It's got to be an intentional "fuck you."
MJ|7.20.11 @ 1:10PM|#
"But because the program starts collecting premiums right away and paying benefits down the road, the CBO was required to score it as reducing the deficit in the first decade, which is why it got grafted onto ObamaCare. Without CLASS, the health care law loses about $70 billion of its alleged deficit reduction."
Again, Obamacare was passed on a tissue of lies, that everyone around knew were lies, but Obama and the Dems are not going to get their feet held to the fire (except here and other media outliers) because the Progs are too in love with "health care reform".
Fluffy|7.20.11 @ 1:15PM|#
One of these days they're going to push me over the edge with one of these acronyms.
We need a Find Unknown Corporate Kleptocrats In Training Act.
Old Mexican|7.20.11 @ 1:28PM|#
Unsustainable, yes. But is it polluting?
Because if not, then the Tonys of the world will not have any beef against it.
|7.20.11 @ 1:43PM|#
tha makes a lot of sense when you think about it. WOw.
www.net-privacy.us.tc
fish|7.20.11 @ 1:44PM|#
Government program aside....Michelle Obama looks awful in that photo....so pale....so drawn.
|7.20.11 @ 2:17PM|#
Yeah, but who's that silver-haired old lady she's holding hands with?
fish|7.20.11 @ 3:07PM|#
I don't know.... looks a little bit like famed wrestler Ric Flair. Didn't know he swung that way.
E Michelson|7.20.11 @ 3:25PM|#
According to the CBO link in the post it would reduce the deficit by $58 Billion, not $70B as cited in the article.
I question the editor's choice of the term "quasi entitlement". What does it mean? This program is a straight up government run insurance program that looks to be optional. I don't think it could be called an entitlement in the same way the Social Security, Medicare and a standing army is an entitlement.