Reason.com
The Book of Saul
Over at NR, the
conservative historian Ronald Radosh
reviews Nicholas von Hoffman's recent
book about Saul Alinsky. He winds up giving the lefty
rabble-rouser a mixed but fairly friendly assessment. The essay has
a rather tentative air, and while Radosh generally refrains from
challenging von Hoffman's views, he also tends to stop short of
claiming those opinions as his own. Still, at a time when much of
the right believes Alinsky was one of the
great villains of American history, it's a change of pace to
see a magazine like National Review airing the thesis that
Alinsky was "a man with a libertarian sensibility who supported all
the little men fighting against any large structure."
Elsewhere in Reason: My own post about the von Hoffman book, and my article arguing that the core problem with ACORN is that it wasn't Alinskyan enough.
Most Popular Stories
- Here Are the 15 Senators Who Voted to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Conducting Warrantless Raids on America's Farmers (Not One of Them is a Democrat) (5.24)
- When Government Privileges Trump the Rights of Citizens (5.25)
- Rand Paul Amendment to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Raiding Farms Fails, 78-15 (5.24)
- Is the Ron Paul the Best Hope for Progressives? (5.25)
- Friday Funnies (5.25)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
Fist of Etiquette|8.23.10 @ 5:22PM|#
Word on the street is that the conservatives were planning to take Alinsky tactics to use for their own designs.
Irresponsible Hater|8.23.10 @ 6:28PM|#
"Alinsky tactics, baby! Fighting fire with fire!!! WOOOOOOO!!!"
-|8.23.10 @ 5:46PM|#
Alinsky was "a man with a libertarian sensibility"
Huh. Rubber Saul.
Irresponsible Hater|8.23.10 @ 6:27PM|#
I've been "politically aware" and active for, say 20 years, and known about a decent variety of minor movers + shakers on the left and right going back to, say, the New Deal.
I'd never heard of Aulinsky until about 2 years ago when Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh started shouting his name over and over and over again. And their callers started refering to using "Aulinsky tactics against the left, baby!". And everyone else is acting like they've always been aware of this guy and his status as some foundational figure in the imagination of the left for the last million years.
So my question is, why wasn't I cc'd on the memo?
|8.24.10 @ 6:40AM|#
Because Alinsky died over 20 years ago. He didn't much matter until Obamanut the latter day Alinsky disciple forced his way into our lives.
|8.23.10 @ 6:34PM|#
I really doubt the republicans were really going to take Alinsky's tactics and put them in use on the streets.
Home Mortgage Loans
Fist of Etiquette|8.23.10 @ 7:16PM|#
Outstanding.
Paul|8.23.10 @ 7:53PM|#
Ok... ok....
¢|8.23.10 @ 8:07PM|#
So my question is, why wasn't I cc'd on the memo?
They don't tell the marks.
Robert|8.23.10 @ 9:41PM|#
If you'd heard from Abbie Hoffman, you'd've heard of Saul Alinsky.
If there could be said to have been a prominent modern Stirnerite, Alinsky was it.
Jesse Walker|8.23.10 @ 11:16PM|#
Alinsky and Stirner had just about nothing in common. And while Hoffman and Alinsky had a similar talent for playing the media (and a similar sense of humor), there's some pretty substantial differences between them as well.
Robert|8.25.10 @ 9:22PM|#
But Abbie Hoffman credited Alinsky a lot, regardless of whatever Alinksy may have thought of him.
And Stirnerites, when you can find them, have little in common with each other. Don't be blinded by the I-ness in Stirner to his advice on methods.
Irresponsible Hater|8.24.10 @ 11:57AM|#
I'm not a *complete* idiot - I know who Abbie Hoffman is, but I'd never heard the name Alinsky until he was inducted into the current script of the two minutes of hate.
Irresponsible Hater|8.24.10 @ 12:33PM|#
Here's what I'm talking about: Do a Google Book search for "Alinsky" in the text of a random selection of books on the 60's, the left, radicals:
This guy could have been, at most, a minor figure in his time, right?
Jesse Walker|8.24.10 @ 3:40PM|#
His glory days were pre-'60s.
|8.23.10 @ 10:00PM|#
Still, at a time when much of the right believes Alinsky was one of the great villains of American history
When "much of the right" means "self-selected bloggers (because they answered!) whose daily traffic is almost 100/day".
|8.23.10 @ 10:24PM|#
I don't see Andi Sullivan.
I don't see David Frum.
I don't see John McCain.
Are you sure the people RWN polled were "conservative"?
|8.24.10 @ 6:39AM|#
von Hoffman still writing books, jesus awre we going to see teradactyls flying too?
Air Jordans 2011 Shoes|10.3.11 @ 9:38PM|#
Here you can choose more new products, enjoy more discounts, so you get favorite products while saving money.