CAP's Wal-Mart Cash

As Peter Suderman wrote yesterday, news that Wal-Mart had joined forces with the liberal think tank Center for American Progress (CAP) and the SEIU in support of "health care reform" is, at first blush, perhaps something of a surprise. Except that it isn't at all surprising to those who have been paying attention. Washington Examiner columnist Tim Carney, who has written a book on the pernicious intersection of big government and big business, reminds those arguing that corporate-government convergence is some type of Obama "breakthrough" of recent history:

Wal-Mart's support for this regulation is new, but times have not changed. Wal-Mart, remember, joined labor unions in lobbying for a hike in the minimum wage, and a Wal-Mart executive testified before Congress in favor of cap-and-trade years ago.

And "The highly ideological behavior of the business community"? What in the world is [CAP blogger Matt] Yglesias talking about? The Chamber of Commerce's endorsement of Obama's stimulus plan? Or the fact that Barney Frank scored higher on the Chamber's score card than did Ron Paul? What does Yglesias make of Philip Morris's decade-long campaign for tobacco regulation, or Mattel's 2007-08 full-court press for toy-safety rules?

Are GE and Duke Energy's support fo Waxman-Markey "change" from Enron's support for U.S. ratification of Kyoto? And on health care, did Yglesias miss the fact that the big HMOs supported HillaryCare?

The notion that Big Business has long been reflexively anti-government is a myth, and Yglesias repeats it here in order to pat his boss John Podesta (whose brother lobbies for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and whose sister-in-law lobbies for Boeing, Cigna, and dozens of other megacorps,) and the President (who received more money than anyone else from Wall Street, and frankly every industry but insurance) on the back for "change."

Over at Forbes.com, Tevi Troy points out that CAP is the (recent?) beneficiary of Wal-Mart largesse:

As for the liberal-leaning Center for American Progress, it has an added incentive to welcome Wal-Mart into polite company. While the left has shunned the corporate behemoth for years, according to its Web site Wal-Mart gives the think tank between $500,000 and $999,999. Perhaps CAP will get more than just brownie points from the Obama administration for brokering this deal.

So CAP accuses Wal-Mart of "corporate social irresponsibility" and gets a big bag of cash in return, while I wrote this paean to the big box store and get bupkis?

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Mike||

    Corporations support free markets for items they buy, but want government to raise prices on everything they sell. They support all subsidies that benefit them, but are against all taxes that hurt them. They have mottos like "Don't Be Evil", but are willing to cowtow to governments if it will make extra money. In other words, they are generally valueless and self-interested.

    But unlike governments, they can't steal from you or kill you.

  • Cal Lipigian||

    When you press one of these anti-Capitalists, what they are really opposed to is this kind of marriage of government force with business profit motive. But I guess now that The Right People Are In Charge, no problem.

  • ChrisO||

    Big corporations back whomever they believe can win and screw over their competitors with various regulations. Don't know why this should shock anyone. It's smaller businesses that are more reflexively Republican.

  • JB||

    Fuck Walmart, fuck anyone who works at Walmart, fuck anyone who shops at Walmart.

  • nj||

    This really should be a wake up call for the libertarians that defended Walmart over the years.

  • EoT||

    As Hayek would say, there really is no substituting an entrepreneur for a manager/administrator.

    In our system the entrepreneurs get fucked and the managerial fucktards get rewarded.

  • ||

    It has taken me this long to realize that Walmart is responsible for the Clinton Machine. I'm not sure the savings can make up for such a sin.

  • ||

    corporate-government convergence

    That rings a bell.

  • mark||

    And I just defended them in a previous post. Definitely going to try not to shop there if my money's going to CAP.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement