Nick Gillespie | June 30, 2009
From the Wash Post, a warning not to count on cashing out that government-owned GM stock any time soon:
For the United States to fully recover its investment, the value of General Motors stock will have to reach levels it has never before attained....
"I don't know how much we're going to recover," a senior Obama administration official said as the company headed into bankruptcy last month.
This uncertainty stems from the difficulty in valuing the 60 percent GM stake that the United States will receive in exchange for the public investment. The government also gets preferred shares and other compensation.
The stake will be worth enough to fully cover the government's direct investment only if GM's stock rises above $68 billion. Even at its recent 2000 peak, GM's stock was worth only $56 billion.
And just so we're clear: "These calculations do not include the billions of dollars that the United States has put into GMAC, GM's financing arm, and into aiding auto suppliers." And just so we're even clearer about the visionary thinking that continues apace related to the producer of the mighty Aztek:
In announcing the government's intention to put another $30 billion into the company earlier this month, President Obama said, "We're making these investments not because I want to spend the American people's tax dollars, but because I want to protect them."
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
"We're making these investments not because I want to spend
the American people's tax dollars, but because I want to protect
them."
Is he even trying anymore? This is like saying "Nobody's really
listening anymore. I can just say something pithy and obfuscating
and people will think it's insightful and all
straight-shootery."
"We're making these investments not because I want to spend the
American people's tax dollars, but because I want to protect
them."
Protect them from *what*, exactly?
"Protect them from *what*, exactly?"
The American people, of course.
Um....spending $30 billion to protect $68 billion? If your $68
billion is in so much trouble that you need to spend another half
that amount to protect it, isn't that a sign you should cut your
losses?
Dear Chosen One, in your extensive studies of every topic in the
universe, something may have slipped past even a mind as great as
yours. Therefore, I respectfully suggest you google the term "sunk
cost".
"Nobody's really listening anymore. I can just say something pithy and obfuscating and people will think it's insightful and all straight-shootery."
This is all Obama has ever done. His only virtue was he was not
Bush, not that Bush ran for prez in 2008.
Got to hand it to Obama, he is the only possible person that in
contrast makes Jimmy Carter and Hillary Clinton look
good better less bad.
The stake will be worth enough to fully cover the
government's direct investment only if GM's stock rises above $68
billion.
I suspect this claim incorporates the outlandish assumption that
"we" are done pounding cash into this particular rathole.
...GMAC, GM's financing arm...
Are GM and GMAC even related anymore? I thought the two were split
years ago and are not even related at the highest board room level.
I might be wrong.
"We're making these investments not because I want to spend
the American people's tax dollars, but because I want to protect
them."
Sounds like no one ever told Obama the first rule of investing my
father taught me -- don't throw good money after bad.
> I respectfully suggest you google the term "sunk
cost".
Didn't the Soviets have trouble with this concept, insisting the US
reimburse them for useless nukes? Guess *I* better Google that
...
The entire continued existence of the government is a massive Sunk Cost Fallacy carefully bespattered with pseudo-Leibnizean "best of all possible governments" claptrap.
"We're making these investments not because I want to spend the
American people's tax dollars, but because I want to protect
them."
In addition, War Is Peace,Preventive Detention Is Freedom, and
Darkness Is Light. So stop complaining, guys, and get ready for
Hate Week.
This corporate welfare should be ended, and GM should be turned over to the workers and run as a Worker's Syndicate.
Whenever a Democrat politician uses the word "investment," my sphincter reflexively tightens up.
Madoff was a piker compared to these guys. And he got 150 years. What will these guys get? [Awards, kudos, re-elections, millions for memoirs, a spot on Mt. Rushmore.]
Therefore, I respectfully suggest you google the term "sunk
cost".
At this point, Obama is a sunk cost.
Yo! Fuck Obama Motors!
Inspired by Xeones.
Oh and "straight shootery"? WIN!!!
"We're making these investments not because I want to spend the
American people's tax dollars, but because I want to protect
them."
Protect them from *what*, exactly?
NO,no,no,no, you are off the track completely,it's not 'what' that
is ambiguous, it is the 'them', and 'them' ain't the 'people' but
of course his union cronies.
I wonder if Obama is going to bailout Transformers. It is a
showcase for GM products and a miserable failure like GM.
In all seriousness I wonder if Toyota, Honda, and Ford are planning
to start production of vehicles that GM and Dodge won't be able to
make due to their deal with satan. I also can't wait until Ford
sues for having to compete with the government to sell cars, along
with the trade issues that will most likely arise with Japan.
This corporate welfare should be ended, and GM should be turned over to the workers and run as a Worker's Syndicate.
The "Workers" aren't interested in running General Motors they want
to milk it.
And turned over by whom exactly? And what "Corporate Welfare"? The
"corporate capitalists", ie the shareholders and the secured
creditors aren't getting shit in this, they've been
dispossessed.
In all seriousness I wonder if Toyota, Honda, and Ford are planning to start production of vehicles that GM and Dodge won't be able to make due to their deal with satan.
I want Honda to make a proper rear-wheel/FWD, body on frame,
pick-up truck with at least a 5000lb towing capacity. I'd buy
that.
After driving the GF's 2007 Civic around, whenever I need a new car
it will be nearly one-stop shopping. The only comparison I am
likely to do is o compare the price between different Honda
dealers. Fuck the UAW.
"I don't know how much we're going to recover," a senior
Obama administration official said as the company headed into
bankruptcy last month.
Let me help you out there, sparky. The word you're looking for is
"squat".
-jcr
Dear Chosen One, in your extensive studies of every topic in
the universe, something may have slipped past even a mind as great
as yours. Therefore, I respectfully suggest you google the term
"sunk cost".
DOUBLE DOWN! DOUBLE DOWN!
"We're making these investments not because I want to spend the
American people's tax dollars, but because I want to protect
them."
Um... "I've abandoned free-market principles to save the
free-market system,"
I thought we were done with Bush... Obama's just another
politician. Don't try to tell us that he's anything special or
revolutionary.
Whenever a Democrat politician uses the word "investment,"
my sphincter reflexively tightens up.
You must be looking to get more tissue damage than the rest of
us.
I speak of the CEO and board of GM.
But in a way, you're right. They're trading servitude to the
capitalist for servitude to the state, and both kinds of servitude
and exploitation are bad.
I want to protect them.
I bet that muggers all over the country will be using that line
now. "Let me protect your money".
-jcr
"But in a way, you're right. They're trading servitude to the
capitalist for servitude to the state, and both kinds of servitude
and exploitation are bad."
Perhaps, but only one of these can use force to get you to comply
when you'd rather not. No small detail, no?
doubled,
No, see, you missed the whole part about "economic coercion." If
you have one dollar and I have two dollars, that extra dollar of
mine is just like a loaded gun pointed right at your head.
A slightly richer neighbor and a fully armed SWAT team are the
exact same thing.
Meanwhile
Ford last increased quarterly production in late 2007. This increase is also the second time Ford has upped its third-quarter production plans.
The company now plans to produce 485,000 vehicles in the third quarter, or 16% more vehicles than it produced last year during the same period.
"We do see the light at the end of the tunnel," said George Pipas, Ford's top sales analyst.
Ford - the only domestic automaker to not file for bankruptcy - is poised to ride the upturn. Ford expects to gain retail market share in June, as it has in eight of the last nine months. [italics added]
How well would they be doing if GM and Chrysler weren't being
propped up by the governmant? I've said it before, Ford Motor is
getting screwed by the Bushama bailout of companies that should be
parted out.
j sub d says : "How well would they (Ford motors) be doing if GM
and Chrysler weren't being propped up by the governmant? I've said
it before, Ford Motor is getting screwed by the Bushama bailout of
companies that should be parted out."
To steal from Inigo: I think fair doesn't mean what you think it
means.
But , not suprising in the least. The whole subprime, banking
fiasco is also about propping up (rewarding) those who were
unprudent with their capital and failed with the treasure of those
who were prudent and succeeded.
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and
the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of
misery. - Winston Churchill
GM is only interested in recieving TARP funds, etc. it no longer cares about building cars, as aslong as the billions keep coming from the taxpayer, why even build a car. We pay to have the workers sit at home all summer a near full pay, we pay to have lobbyiest lobby for more funds. we pay for the DIP, we pay for GM not to build cars, we pay to keep plants open, which do not build cars, we pay billions, yet GM has only build one car in the last 6 months. Guessing how much it will cost when they actual start building cars, going to be stupid billions. Please let the firm go away, and a different firm build fronm the base up.
I wonder if Obama is going to bailout Transformers. It is a
showcase for GM products and a miserable failure like
GM.
Transformers is making money. Lots of it. Maybe GM ought to go into
the film business, since they obviously have to aptitude for the
car business anymore.
GM is going to be like the airline companies. They'll get gobs of money every few years, and declare bankruptcy every 15 years. It will be a zombie company, the walking dead.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245