Nick Gillespie | June 30, 2009
Via Glenn Reynolds via TaxProf Blog via Cato, from the OECD comes this ranking of "tax oppressiveness." The higher the ranking, the more oppressive the jurisdiction. Switzerland and Luxembourg are 30 and 29.
The tax oppression index is based on 18 representative criteria measuring fiscal attractiveness, public governance and financial privacy in the 30 member states of the OECD.
- Italy
- Turkey
- Poland
- Mexico
- Germany
- Netherlands
- Belgium
- Hungary
- France
- Greece
- United Kingdon
- United States
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
So, Germany, France and the U.K., with all the socialised
trimmings, are better than the U.S.?
hmmmm.
CATO link is bugged
Here is the real link which gives a better run down of the study's
criteria:
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/06/26/tax-oppression-index-ranks-america-in-bottom-half-of-industrialized-nations/
bb
The higher the ranking, the more oppressive the jurisdiction.
In other words, this is a contest no one should want to win.
However, Canada works for your purposes since at 27th it appears to
lead the US.
Isaac,
Canada is less centralized than the U.S., more "federalist" in
other words, so that might partly explain the lower tax
oppressiveness.
Isaac,
Of course, Germany is even more decentralized in many ways (I mean,
their federal bureaucracy is almost non-existant) than either
Canada or the U.S.
IB, thanks. My brain, or whatever occupies my brain case, said
to me that 30 is higher than 1 so there are 11 better than the
U.S.
Apologies to all for my brain-fart.
Karen Bass tells me that we would not be near the bottom of this list and be at the top if not for the terrorism of right wing talk radio. Apparently, Italy knows how to deal with its terrorists.
"Of course, Germany is even more decentralized in many ways (I
mean, their federal bureaucracy is almost non-existant) than either
Canada or the U.S."
Germany had a wonderful federal system until Hilter whacked it. I
guess it has been rebuilt?
At least we were a lottery pick. USA! USA!
(99.9% of you
will have no idea what I'm referring to, so don't bother)
John,
Yeah, it was rebuilt. Basically there are something a few thousand
federal bureaucrats in Germany. Most of federal and state law to
the best of my knowledge is enforced, etc. by state bureaucrats
there. It would be as if the EPA was mostly staffed by a state
agencies.
Xeones,
It isn't an OECD country. It is doing better than it did when it
had a centralized government though.
Another criteria was public debt as a % of GDP. Canada, for all its faults, has been paying off debt and balancing budgets.
Episiarch,
Godwin? I think you malign John. He's referring to Hitler only in
the historical benchmark sense--i.e., Germany had a robust
federalist system prior to 1933.
Godwin would be attacking anti-federalism by saying that Hitler
hated federalism, too.
John,
Godwin's law states that as the length of an argument on the
Internet grows longer, the probability of one side accusing the
other of being like the Nazi's approaches 1.
When this law was first popularized it led people to the following
custom: when one side accuses the other of being Nazi's the
argument is over and the side that leveled the accusation has lost.
This was called Godwinning the thread.
You didn't actually godwin anything. There is no hyperbole in
mentioning the Nazis when discussing 20th century German
history.
Epi
I'm not sure it's a Godwin if you happen to mention Hitler in a
historical context.
I thought it was more about saying someone or something was
like Hitler.
But maybe I'm taking this all too seriously.
Oh and Episiarch, Pro Libertate, I actually write my
posts insted of quickly dashing off a link to other people's
work.
So there! :P
Godwin would be attacking anti-federalism by saying that Hitler hated federalism, too.
But Hitler really did hate Federalism. :)
I just forgot what that was Epi. And the other posters are right. I didn't accuse anyone of being a Nazi. I only pointed out that Hitler destroyed the German federal system. That is not an example of Godwin's law.
Epi, just in general, you're worse than Hitler.
(OK, I confess: I think "You're Worse Than Hitler" would be an
awesome t-shirt slogan. It would be like pre-emptively Godwinning
the whole damn world.)
I Hilter had survived the war and then went on to create the intertubes, we'd need a different verb that Godwinned.
Does Mike get a royalty every time any mentions Hitler in a pejorative sense about someone or something else?
Sweden seven spots ahead of the US at #19? How can that be. Canada #27? What does that even mean? There must be some very advanced accounting going into these rankings.
"Well it's the North Minehead by-election. Mr Xones' standing as the National Bocialist candidate. He's got wonderful plans for Minehead."
Warren, Canada has a simpler income tax code and a lower top
marginal rate (29% IIRC). The low income tax rate is somewhat
offset by the GST (which is at 7 or 8%, I believe).
I don't know how Sweden makes it but I do know the top marginal
rate has been slashed from the 105% that pissed Igmar Bergman off
so badly. Even Swedes get tired of Swedish levels of taxation.
My people, please relax. It is misfortune my predecessors only got us to number twelve in the oppression index. By the end of my first term, I promise I will get us to number one. U-S-A! Number one!
It would be clearer if i had written;
"The benefit of the low income tax rate is somewhat offset..."
This kind of thing is always wonderful and imo incredibly
undercutting of much libertarian rhetoric. According to such
rhetoric Luxembourg should be some kind of stagnant, tyrannical
hell on earth.
Of course, that's not the case. It kicks our ass in GDP per capita
and other indicators.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/LU.html
Even mentioning Hitler makes one worse than Hitler. Right
Episiarch?
John, you're worse than Michael Bay.
Seward | June 30, 2009, 2:48pm | #
tarran,
I wonder why no one ever gets accused of being like
Stalin?
Being a commie mean never having to say you are sorry.
"I wonder why no one ever gets accused of being like
Stalin?"
Seward, See the article below about Michael Jackson.
Fuck. What is wrong with my 's's today?
sssssssssssssss -- there. That will cover any plural forms I miss
for the rest of the week.
This kind of thing is always wonderful and imo incredibly
undercutting of much libertarian rhetoric. According to such
rhetoric Luxembourg should be some kind of stagnant, tyrannical
hell on earth.
MNG, please recognize that 30 is the most libertarian and 1 is the
least, and reconsider your world view.
This kind of thing is always wonderful and imo incredibly
undercutting of much libertarian rhetoric. According to such
rhetoric Luxembourg should be some kind of stagnant, tyrannical
hell on earth.
[citation needed -- or, at least a fucking supportive argument]
MNG, please recognize that 30 is the most libertarian and 1
is the least, and reconsider your world view.
Haw haw!
MNG is worse than if Hitler and Michael Bay had a baby.
An arrest warrant has been issued for Michael Bay. The crime? Raping my childhood.
Hitler taxed worse than even Obama will have to, he took everyone's jews away!
"Isaac Bartram | June 30, 2009, 3:11pm | #
"Warren, Canada has a simpler income tax code and a lower top
marginal rate (29% IIRC). The low income tax rate is somewhat
offset by the GST (which is at 7 or 8%, I believe)."
The 29% top marginal tax rate is only the federal portion.
Provincial income taxes bring the total up substantially. (e.g. my
combined marginal tax rate in Ontario is 46.4%). Plus, the
threshold is set much lower... anyone earning over ~$120k finds
themselves in the top tax bracket.
The GST has recently been lowered from 7% to 5%, but most provinces
have their own sales taxes as well (8% in Ontario).
Canada's hardly a tax haven.
MNG | June 30, 2009, 3:14pm | #
This kind of thing is always wonderful and imo incredibly
undercutting of much libertarian rhetoric. According to such
rhetoric Luxembourg should be some kind of stagnant, tyrannical
hell on earth.
Of course, that's not the case. It kicks our ass in GDP per capita
and other indicators.
I'm not sure what your point is, MNG - please do expound. Luxemborg
wasn't on the list - probably because they are too small. The fact
that they are small and are a tax haven drawing many times more
capital per capita, which they use to fund a generous welfare
state. They are also culturally and ethnically homogeneous which
makes welfare easy to administrate "fairly" thus disguising the
inherent unfairness of such a system in the assumptions that
members of a clan are wont to extend each other.
Obviously, Michael Bay can't be as bad as Hitler, being only a
simple movie director and not having slaughtered millions. .
.yet.
However, if Michael Bay had been the leader of Germany during the
30s and 40s, I'm confident he'd have been worse.
domo! Luxembourg was on the list! It was eighteen spots less tax oppressive than the United States.
The GST has recently been lowered from 7% to 5%, but most provinces have their own sales taxes as well (8% in Ontario).
Canada's hardly a tax haven.
I suspect that this study may only have considered central
goverments.
And thanks for the info on the GST. I'm quite aware of the
provincial income and sales taxes having had occasion to pay both.
IIRC, except in Quebec, it's a percentage of your federal tax
obligation and collect by Revenue Canada and disbursed from there
to the provinces.
Obviously, Michael Bay can't be as bad as Hitler
O Rly? He's slaughtered millions...of tastefulnesses. That doesn't
make any sense, but I don't have to--it's Michael Bay, after
all.
"Michael Bay gets to keep making movies and Cartman gets his own
theme park; there is no God."
And he'll be allowed to continue inflicting his harm on our synapses due to the boatloads of money his latest crap endeavor is making. What's wrong with kids today?
GDP per capita is a proxy for overall economic success, but as liberals are fond of pointing out, distribution matters too. The US is an incredibly diverse set of communities of widely varying economic potential, geography, cultural norms, access to capital/communication/transportation etc. We have a lot of poverty, and disadvantaged people - both geographically, and culturally. We have these enclaves "bringing down our average" in ways that most socialized european contries cant imagine, yet we still manage to be in the top 5-10 in RGDP/capita every year - only losing to small, homogeneous countries (luxembourg, singapore, sweden) which often rely on natural resource extraction for their spot on the list (qatar, brunei, kuwait). To be sure, the US is blessed with natural resourcesl, but we import most of ours. In fact, our consumption of those resources, and the incredible way that we generate wealth based off their use is WHY these countries have such a high standard of living - so I'm going to go ahead and give the US credit for that as well.
TAO - didn't go to the source link, just assumed. but thanks for pointing out, it undercuts MNG's point as well, if there weren't enough other factors...
I'm just waiting until I can move into the local Mr. Lee's Greater Hong Kong franchulate. I hear security is great.
From wikipedia:
During the past decades, growth in the financial sector has
more than compensated for the decline in steel. Services,
especially banking and other financial exports, account for the
majority of economic output. Luxembourg is the world's second
largest investment fund center (after the USA), the most important
private banking center in the Eurozone and Europe's leading center
for reinsurance companies. Moreover, the Luxembourgish government
has tried to attract internet start-ups. Skype, Jajah and eBay are
only a few of the many internet companies that have shifted their
local or global headquarters to Luxembourg.
That is what being a tax haven can do for ya.
Also, anyone on this board ever tossed out the idea the US is a
Libertopia? Where on earth does one get such a stupid notion.
"Michael Bay gets to keep making movies and Cartman gets his own
theme park; there is no God."
Episiarch, it is not Michael Bay's fault you have cronic infected
hemeroids. It is Jerry Bruckheimer's fault.
Luxembourg is my "oh shit gotta run" country. Of course, I should get my passport first...
It is Jerry Bruckheimer's fault.
No, it's Joel Silver's, because Richard K. Morgan has optioned
Altered
Carbon to him, and I dread the results. It'll probably
star Will Smith. Though to Silver's credit he has produced some
good shit.
But Hitler really did hate Federalism. :)
What?!?!
His other trespasses may be forgiven but to hate
federalism!!!
Hitler you go to far!
Episiarch, you can only dream it will star Will Smith. That role has Nick Cage written all over it.
Episiarch, you can only dream it will star Will Smith. That
role has Nick Cage written all over it.
HOW'D IT GET BURNED?!? HOW'D IT GET BURNED?!?!?!?
TAO, you may consider a country with no extradition treaty. Here
is a list to get you started:
Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh,
Bophuthatswana, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape
Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, China (People's Republic of
China), Ciskei, The Comors, Cote d' Ivoire, Djibouti, Equatorial
Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Jordan,
Korea (South), Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Madagascar, Mali, Marshall
Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia, Maldova, Mongolia, Mozambique,
Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Oman, Philippines, Principe and San
Tome, Qatar, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Saudi
Arabia, Senegal, Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Western
Samoa, Yemen, Zaire, and Zimbabwe.
also add:
Andorra, Angola, Bantu Homelands, Bhutan,
Bosnia, Cambodia, Ciskei, Cuba, Iran, Korea (North), Libya,
Maldives, Serbia, Somalia, Taiwan, Transkei, Vanuatu, and
Vietnam.
Though these don't have dimplomatic relations. My fav is probably
vietnam - most capitalist country I've ever visited, and the
noodles are amazing.
We have these enclaves "bringing down our average" in ways
that most socialized european contries cant imagine
I suppose it might be tough for a Frenchmen to drive through the
suburbs of Paris as the annual summer burning of cars might make
the trip a difficult one.
oh, and south korea is probably a swingin' choice too, if that status is still accurate. make sure you have enough dough to buy citizenship, though...
Given the amount of tax cheating that goes on in Italy, there should be an asterisk next to it's #1.
Kuwait doesn't have an extradition treaty? Man, I did not know
that. I wonder how many bored and tempted Soldiers there are who
would love to just melt into Kuwait City? (Of course, the
booze-free nature of the country doesn't help, but still).
In seriousness, if I had to pick from the list, I suppose it would
be either Russia or China.
The 29% top marginal tax rate is only the federal portion.
Provincial income taxes bring the total up substantially. (e.g. my
combined marginal tax rate in Ontario is 46.4%).
...
Canada's hardly a tax haven.
I don't time to read the study now, but if it does not include all
taxes it seems to be fairly useless. While I suppose it is better
for my state to take my money than the feds, someone is still
taking my money.
joshua corning,
You are right to point out the north african ghettos. On the whole,
however, france has lower inequality than the US, and is still more
homogeneous in terms of language, race, culture, and geography than
the US is. The fact that their poor burn cars as well as suck up
welfare (while ours just suck up welfare) doesn't speak to
that.
In seriousness, if I had to pick from the list, I suppose it
would be either Russia or China.
In Putinist Russia, optimism is angry at YOU!
I'm shocked the US doesn't have a treaty with the Philippines,
though i guess part of Cryptonomicon makes more sense
now.
joshua, Frenchmen don't drive through those suburbs of
Paris and the people who live in those suburbs don't go to other
parts of town much either.
Something like in a lot of American cities.
Would've thought?
...only losing to small, homogeneous countries (luxembourg,
singapore, sweden)...
You should change that to "small countries (Luxembourg, Singapore)
or homogeneous countries (Sweden)".
Calling Singapore homogeneous is laughable. But Luxembourg as well
is fantastically heterogeneous. It has the highest number of
migrants per capita of any European country, fully 60% of its
workforce is foreign or cross-border, and 13% of its population is
Portuguese.
Given that Luxembourg consistently far outclasses the other western
nations in GDP per capita, it is excellent evidence that open
economies and free migration are extremely beneficial.
The Italians make up for being #1 by not bothering to pay their taxes.
Tax evasion is something of a national pastime.
And nobody even tries to hide it either.
Given that Luxembourg consistently far outclasses the other
western nations in GDP per capita, it is excellent evidence that
open economies and free migration are extremely
beneficial.
What the hell, are you TRYING to summon LoneWacko?!?
MikeP,
Great points, thank you for informing me. I suppose in luxembourgs
case, it's status as a tax haven, and ability to attract migrants
on favorable terms is key. Large countries can never look at places
like Lux for policy advice though - the stuff that works at that
scale simply doesn't when you have 300mm people.
The fact is that the US is the only country close to it's size to
support such a broadly high standard of living, the socialized
countries of europe pay for their safety net with 1-2% of GDP
growth potential. MNG would like to paint socialized countries as
wealthy and prosperous - but he conveniently ignores the facts and
circumstances that each of the countries ahead of us on the list
have that let them achieve it. you can go down the GDP list, and
check it off:
small tax haven
medium sized homogeneous
natural resource extractor
usually #2 will have some combination of 1 and 3 thrown in. Social
welfare in these countries manages to avoid collapse because:
they can afford to buy it with their wealthy investors money
no one really cheats or loafs because of close social ties
they have to to pacify the masses to retain their grip on
power
Respectively
Have Nick Coppola and Will Smith every been in a film together? I see some sort of buddy flick, directed by Michael Bay. One in which Nick sports some sort of weird doo, and Will Smith plays a cocky, street-smart guy with a heart of gold.
Since when is Mexico "developed"?
Mexico's been
an OECD member since 1994--a couple of years before South Korea
and the richer Eastern European countries were admitted.
(Personally, I've always wondered why Brazil isn't yet a
member.)
I suppose in luxembourgs case, it's status as a tax haven,
and ability to attract migrants on favorable terms is
key.
I could tell you who else thought Luxembourg was key, but I don't
want to Godwin the thread.
You guys totally missed on the choices from DOmos list. Indonesia is easily the top choice. It is a pretty moderate muslim country and Bali totally kicks ass. That would be my first choice. After that, I would take the Heshimite Kingdom of Boredom. Aman isn't too bad of a city. After that, I guess I would take my chances in Russia or South Korea.
WE ARE LUXEMBOURG. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE. DEATH IS IRRELEVANT. YOU WILL BE ASSIMILATED.
"Have Nick Coppola and Will Smith every been in a film together?
I see some sort of buddy flick, directed by Michael Bay. One in
which Nick sports some sort of weird doo, and Will Smith plays a
cocky, street-smart guy with a heart of gold."
That is a great idea. But it needs to be a remake of a classic
movie that Hollywood has no business remaking. How about a hip
modern remake of "In the Heat of the Night" with Nick Cage as Rod
Stieger and Will Smith as Sidney Poitier? Nick Cage plays old
school small town southern cop trying to solve a murder mystery
with the help of street smart hip Philadelphia detective Will
Smith. That would be such a steaming pile of crap, I am really
surprised it hasn't been made.
I'm picturing another Rush Hour, where Will Smith plays a Chris-Tucker like character and Cage roundhouse kicks little girls in the face a la The Wicker Man.
"Nick Cage as Captain Renault; Will Smith as Rick Blaine."
OMG Pro that is even worse than my idea. To top it off, Madona has
been wanting to remake Casablanca for years. She can be Ingrid
Bergman.
The horror.
Italy looks bad at first, but consider that according to In What
Explains Tax Evasion: An Empirical Assessment Based on European
Data (PDF), a paper repared for the Vienna Institute for
International Economic Studies by Edward Christie and Mario
Holzner, the following are the tax compliance rates for developed
Western European countries:
Austria: 74.80%
Belgium: 70.15%
France: 75.38%
Germany; 67.72%
Italy: 62.49%***
Netherlands: 72.84%
Portugal: 68.09%
United Kingdom: 77.97%
The latest income tax compliance figures for the United States,
released by the Internal Revenue Service, put compliance with the
tax code (PDF) at about 84%.
Italy looks a little better now. HEROIC!
It's hard to believe S. Korea does not have an extradition agreement with us.
MNG,
Canada has a better tax burden than the U.S.? That can't be
correct, can it?
Is reading that hard?
First you choke the list order, making the counterargument
yourself, then you failed to read the many posts pointing out this
is only central government and doesnt include the provincial
taxation.
RIF!!
Canada has a better tax burden than the U.S.? That can't be correct, can it?
MNG, see:
Isaac Bartram | June 30, 2009, 3:11pm
Russ R. | June 30, 2009, 3:26pm
and
Isaac Bartram | June 30, 2009, 3:42pm
Ben Affleck as Victor Laszlo; Marky Mark as Major Strasser;
Ashton Kutcher as Ugarte; Orlando Bloom as Signor Ferrari; Matthew
McCoughney as Sam.
And Paris Hilton as Ilsa Lund.
It's been such a crappy summer movie season...
Anyone seen Hurt Locker or Public Enemies
yet?
Pro,
I am thinking George Clooney as Rick and Orlando Bloom as the
Victor Lazlo disident. Only I set it in Aman Jordan before the
start of the Iraq war. Instead of running from Nazis, Lazlo is
running from Haliburton and the CIA because he knows that the war
is based on a lie. At the end of the movie he gets on a plane to go
to the US and write for the New York Times. Clooney tells him that
he knows of a state Senator in Illinois who is going to someday
change things and that Lazlo should work for him when he gets to
America. As Lazlo's plane takes off the opening night of the war,
Rick and the police captain discuss how Iraq is going to have a
resistance and he knows some bomb makers in Bahgdad that will need
supplies. And thus begins a beautiful friendship. And the director
has to be Roman Polanski. There would definitely be a scene where
the evil Haliburton killer photographs topless, drugs and rapes a
13 year old girl.
I can't believe Hollywood hasn't made it yet.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245