Bill Flanigen | June 25, 2009
The National Prison Rape Elimination Commission released its final report and recommendations this week. The Commission was established by the Prison Rape Elimination Act in 2003 to develop a set of policy proposals to end sexual abuse in prisons. The recommendations, though, read more like a desperate plea for basic competency in prison management. Sample a few of its groundbreaking ideas:
To begin with, every correctional agency must have a written policy mandating zero tolerance for all forms of sexual abuse in all settings, whether it is operated by the government or by a private company working under contract with the government....
Thoroughly screen all new job applicants...to prevent hiring, retaining, or promoting anyone who has engaged in sexual abuse....
Strict limits on cross-gender searches and the viewing of prisoners who are nude or performing bodily functions are necessary because of the inherently personal nature of such encounters....
Facilities have a duty to thoroughly investigate every allegation of sexual abuse without delay and to completion, regardless of whether or not the alleged victim cooperates with investigators....
The Commission urges that individuals under the age of 18 be held seperately from the general population.
To recap: Have zero tolerance for sexual abuse, don't hire people with a history of sexual abuse, don't allow cross-gender observation of nude prisoners, fully investigate alleged sexual abuses, and separate adult and juvenile prisoners.
If these suggestions seem obvious to you...well, they should. Perhaps you'd be interested in a career in corrections?
To my mind, there are two possibilities here. Either the commission has wasted years of funding and produced a vanilla, restatement-of-the-conventional-wisdom report, or the extent of safety problems in America's prisons beggars belief, making a novelty out of even the most conventional policy prosposals. Given the prevalence of stories like this, I'm inclined toward the latter conclusion.
Reason writers have covered prison rape and the National Prison Rape Elimination Commission here, here, and here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
In other news, SCOTUS just ruled 8-1 that strip searching a
student for ibuprofen was unconstitutional. Two judges dissented in
part on the issue of liability (the majority ruled that admin was
shielded from liability). Only Clarence Thomas thought it was
a-ok.
This is my shocked face. :-|
LMNOP,
We're talking about it in the Morning Links thread I believe.
I swear, in most people's minds, rape is part and parcel of a prison sentence, kind of like wearing orange jumpsuits and having lights out at 9. Sickening.
"don't allow cross-gender observation of nude prisoners"
But what if the prison guard is gay?
"I swear, in most people's minds, rape is part and parcel of a
prison sentence, kind of like wearing orange jumpsuits and having
lights out at 9. Sickening."
I agree it is sickening. One way to combat this kind of thinking is
to point out that wrongly convicted prisoners also get raped. Also,
even if you think smoking marijuana should be illegal, do you think
rape is the proper punishment for such a crime?
"I swear, in most people's minds, rape is part and parcel of a
prison sentence, kind of like wearing orange jumpsuits and having
lights out at 9. Sickening."
I'd say you're right.
With apologies to J sub D...
What. The. Fuck. Six goddamn years ago a commission was
formed with the explicit task of coming up with ideas to reduce
instances of prison rape. More than 2000 fucking days later, they
come up with "don't tolerate prison rape"?!?
Whose boss would accept this quarter-assed fuckwittery? If I was
asked to put together a report today on reducing travel mileage
expenses, and six fucking years went by before I told my boss "be
more efficient with travel", I'll give you two guesses where my
career would be.
I hate this shit-stained worthless government and every single
cockface in it. Just like "good" cops who won't fight to kick the
jackbooters out, every single leech on the Hill is culpable.
FUCK.
For the past several years, I've felt prison reform is the most overlooked political issue facing the country.
Rape, along with AIDs, Hepatitis and Tuberculosis is an integral part of the prison experience. It can't nor shouldn't be eliminated, it is part of the punishment, these are criminals after all, who cares what happens to them. If they don't want to be raped they should obey the law.
If they don't want to be raped they should obey the
law.
That's what I told the girl I caught picking flowers in my
yard.
"If they don't want to be raped they should obey the law."
Yeah! And they shouldn't dress so sexy either!
And when I went to download the report itself, I got: "File is
damaged and could not be repaired."
That's got to be like some sub-section of RC's Law.
Nice efforts, but back to reality:
Prisons are filled with people who are there because they show
total disregard for social rules.
Therefore, expect rape.
Prison guard is a rough profession. Expect it to be hard to find
responsible people to fill the role.
So prisons are hell, as they've always been hell, on every
continent.
I don't think the prison abuse [not just rape] problem will be
solved, or that the ongoing problem of abuse of children in state
care will be solved, until we codify some sort of civil
responsibility for the state for persons it takes as wards into its
care.
It has to be made more expensive for the state to fail to properly
protect the people whose lives it asserts the right to manage than
it would be to do what would be necessary to succeed.
"So prisons are hell, as they've always been hell, on every
continent."
Well then, fuck. Let's give up.
I figure the percentage of prisoners who are unjustly incarcerated is probably about the same as the percentage of bad cops.
If anyone I knew said prison rape was OK, I wouldn't have a
whole lot of trouble telling them that I didn't really want to hang
out with anyone who thought that way.
Brett Stevens, we already know you're a Nazi. There are some
comments that can safely be ignored.
Is it just me or is Godwinning a thread happening faster and faster these days?
The only way to combat it is for whoever posts first to type NAZI at the bottom of their post. It's like setting a backfire.
SugarFree,
So you're suggesting destroying the thread to save it? I like
it.
To recap: ... don't hire people with a history of sexual abuse, ...
If these suggestions seem obvious to you...well, they should.
Except reason™ is usually against restrictions on "people with a
history of sexual abuse," so I wouldn't call it obvious to
them.
...against restrictions on "people with a history of sexual abuse," -- citation needed.
"Except reason™ is usually against restrictions on "people
with a history of sexual abuse," so I wouldn't call it obvious to
them."
Is that a drinking offense?
CN,
He's refering to the fact that REASON has had articles in the past
that is critical of laws that subject "sexual predators" to
probably unconstitutional limits on their movements.
Is it really Godwinning when someone calls a nazi a nazi? Seems to me it's just stating a fact.
The only other reasonable solution I can think of is for me to
into the prisons and perform oral sex on everyone, both guards and
inmates, who want it. They will be sexually satisfied and therefore
will no longer have the urge to rape anyone.
I do this because I love America
It has to be made more expensive for the state to fail to
properly protect the people whose lives it asserts the right to
manage than it would be to do what would be necessary to
succeed.
When has cost ever been a primary factor in decision making by the
state? The guy whose testimony Flanigen linked to is on a
medication cocktail to treat his AIDS which arose from the HIV he
was forcibly exposed to while in prison. That treatment is
expensive as all hell and paid for by the state, yet no one in a
position of power will ever link cause with effect.
I figure the percentage of prisoners who are unjustly
incarcerated is probably about the same as the percentage of bad
cops.
So, up in the 80-90% range?
'Strict limits on cross-gender searches'
These theocratic right-wingers just won't give up, will they? Don't
you know that gender is socially constructed, and that any attempt
to separate people into either/or binary categories of 'male' and
'female' simply reifies the oppressive heteronormative oppressive
establishment?
Rape, along with AIDs, Hepatitis and Tuberculosis is an
integral part of the prison experience. It can't nor shouldn't be
eliminated, it is part of the punishment, these are criminals after
all, who cares what happens to them. If they don't want to be raped
they should obey the law.
Hi, juanita. We missed you.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245