Katherine Mangu-Ward | September 2, 2008
In today's Wall Street Journal,
whale meat gets reintroduced into the Icelandic diet after the
end of a 20-year hunting ban:
In a bid to entice urban hipsters, [Gunnar Bergmann] Jonsson started selling marinated whale meat, vacuum-sealed and ready for cooking....At upscale meat shops, Mr. Jonsson began distributing free recipe cards that read, "A feast for the barbecue or the pan." Recipes include whale pepper steak and whale schnitzel.
Mr. Jonsson believes he can hook people—his age and younger—if they only try the stuff. It looks and tastes like beef but costs about half as much.
After trying a nibble of the other red meat—Moby Dick on a stick whale brochettes are popular with tourists—take a moment to thank the man who really saved the whales: John D. Rockefeller.
In 1846, Americans dominated the whaling industry with 735 ships. John D. Rockefeller gets into the oil refining business in 1865. By 1876, kerosene is routing whale oil, and the whaling fleet was down to 39 ships, because kerosene was just so darn cheap:
The price of sperm oil reached its high of $1.77 per gallon in 1856; by 1896 it sold for 40 cents per gallon. Yet it could not keep pace with the price of refined petroleum, which dropped from 59 cents per gallon in 1865 to a fraction over seven cents per gallon in 1895.
This dynamic is also instructive for those fretting that we're going to run out of oil, just as many undoubtedly worried that we were going to run out of whales. (Note to self: Check historical record for instances of the phrase "Peak Whale.")
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I'm holding for some polar bear ribs. I will NOT compromise on this issue.
This dynamic is also instructive...
Yeah, if the market doesn't solve everything, dumb luck will!
In a bid to entice urban hipsters
Whale, the Pabst Blue Ribbon of animal proteins.
I have dissected a porpoise before, and the meat is unbelievably
red because they store oxygen for dives in extra hemoglobin in
their muscles (plus they have a ton of extra blood). I would
love to eat a cetacean, as it looked delicious.
A friend of mine was in the Navy and came across whale meat in
Norway while on shore leave one time. He wanted to buy it but had
no way to cook it, and after he told me, I said "you didn't eat it
raw?"
The stone age ended NOT because the world ran out of
stones.
Ditto for various other ages where the predominant material or
technology was supplanted by a better or more predominant
one.
I suspect that within the next 5 to 10 years the price of oil and
gasoline will drop precipitously because a better idea is coming
along: The all-electric car.
H.F. Wolff
KMW,
From what I have read camphene was what people adopted when there
was a shortage of whale oil. Camphene then had some sort of tax
slapped on it about the same time as the production from the
Pennsylvania oil wells began to come online for the production of
kerosene.
we . . . we have to make a pre-emptive strike against Iceland,
it's . . . it's . . . oooooh . . .
[faints]
I'm on a quest to have every edible animal meat in a hamburger. So far, I'm not doing too good (beef, bison, elk, venison, pork only), but I think a whale meat hamburger would look great on my list of hamburgers...
Had Whale steak in Hokaido, ten years ago, on a research
expedition. Since the per diem was so shitty and I was a poor grad
student, I lived on noodles and tea the rest of the trip to pay for
that Whale. Pretty good, think a lean beef (tenderloin) with a
strong fishy aftertaste.
That steak cost me $80 but it is worth it for bragging rights.
I sampled whale more than 30 years ago in Japan while visiting a cousin. At a restaurant with friends, he proffered a bright red cube. I ate it. Lighter than beef. Rather tasty. Better raw than dipped in hot oil. Midway through dinner I was informed that the meat was whale and not Kobe beef.
I would love a restaurant where you could club your own baby seal before they fry that bitch up for you. Kind of like picking your own lobster from a tank, but with bonus violence.
Outside Magazine, May 2006:
Bloody Business
"Norwegian fishermen call it an honest day's work. Greenpeace calls
it a violent crime. The issue is the annual hunt for North Atlantic
minke whales, a plentiful species that, every spring, gets
harpooned by the hundreds and then sold in Norway's seafood aisles.
Who's right? As PHILIP ARMOUR learns during a voyage aboard the
whaleboat Sofie, the truth isn't pretty-but it's a lot more
complicated than you'd think."
think a lean beef (tenderloin) with a strong fishy
aftertaste.
The strong fishy aftertaste was what turned me off of crocodile
meat.
KMW, thank you for this. Lots of us take this info for granted
without realizing that nobody is learning this in school.
Probably because the school is busy turning the grass field into a
mud hole and running off those "two minute showers" flyers to send
home to the parents.
"Peak oil" does not mean "run out of oil". It means just what it says: the point at which production peaks. What happens after that depends on whether you believe anything else can be ramped up in time to replace it.
unless oil can mate and reproduce, the whale story has nothing to do w/ whether we are running out of oil.
Uh, yeah, worrying about running out of whales. How, uh, silly.
We better "check [the] historical record" to see if anyone worried
about running out of whales.
Wtf???
And running out of oil? Madness! Can't happen. "Nonrenewable"
is, like, Latin for "doesn't go away." Check the historical
records!
Like with Whales!1@!@
unless oil can mate and reproduce, the whale story has nothing to do w/ whether we are running out of oil.
Yeah, I didn't get that either.
unless oil can mate and reproduce, the whale story has
nothing to do w/ whether we are running out of oil.
Had we not discovered how to make cheap fuel from oil whales would
be extinct, not mating and reproducing.
I think the point is that the free market handles peak
situations by replacing a technology that becomes too expensive
with a cheaper one. Less capacity for cheap oil will drive new
technologies faster than people screaming "PEAK OIL!1!" every
chance they get.
And, right or wrong, the "peak oil" folks always seem to say it
with a sadistic gleam in their eye. As if Road Warrior is
an aspirational documentary...
Wait... there's such a thing as sperm oil? And people will pay
for it? Finally, a chance for me to be part of the solution AND get
rich in the process!
Oh, and I think the point of the whale/oil comparison is that, just
as whales were saved when the demand for its oil was supplanted
with demand for kerosene, so will our energy crisis be solved when
our demand for oil is supplanted by a demand for, um, some other
energy source we've yet to (seriously) consider. Not saying I'm
particularly interested in waiting around for that to happen, but
it's an argument frequently espoused 'round these parts (and
elsewhere, I should add).
unless oil can mate and reproduce, the whale story has
nothing to do w/ whether we are running out of oil.
Well, actually, it does. On two fronts. Being able to mate and
reproduce doesn't mean you'll always be around. And, the story is
illustrative of how markets work. Besides, we've been 'running out
of oil' for the last eight decades, so there is the boy who
cried wolf a billion times factor to overcome.
There is no question that at some point in time oil will no longer
be an economically feasible source of energy. Today, we're not
clear about what may take it's place. However, it is fairly certain
that something will. That's not faith, it's a forecast based on
observation, some of which is the observation that when whale oil
became economically less efficient to produce than petroleum, the
market shifted. Absent outright market blockades from Uncle Sugar,
that shift *will* take place and it will take form as a market
response to the ever increasing scarcity of oil.
Guy Montag has long been an advocate of whale oil, or as it's
known in scientific circles, "cetacean biodiesel."
Organic, free range, renewable... what's not to love?
Organic, free range, renewable... what's not to
love?
Its my weekly "agree with joe" moment.
:)
This dynamic is also instructive for those fretting that
we're going to run out of oil, just as many undoubtedly worried
that we were going to run out of whales.
Uh, Katherine, I hate to break it to you, but we *are* running out
of whales. At least one type. Baleen whales are (with a few notable
exceptions) still very endangered. And there are more than a few
types of toothed whales that are in a bad way as well. Two minutes
at google readily reveals this.
I'm game for whale. I better hurry before they run out...
Just this weekend I had sweetbread, tripe, stingray, and turtle.
(but no "baby egg" this time) This is what happpens when you are
~married to a southeast Asian and attend a family get-together. Had
to pass on the pigeons (that were still living last I saw them on
Sunday) as half the clan (the people, not the birds) went to Cirque
Shanghai Gold at Navy pier on Monday. BTW, if anyone ever gets a
chance to see the Cirque Shanghai, don't hesitate. They are
incredible. The clips I've seen on youtube show the performers
being somewhat reserved. (I think maybe they get considerably more
daring on the last day's performance)
a few thoughts:
1) Great historical backgound. Some day I want to go to a global
warming protest with a T-Shirt that reads, "Save fossil fuels; burn
whale oil."
2) I don't think I would ever eat whale meat.
3) Mr. Jonsson can't understand why people aren't buying whale meat
when it is half the price of beef. I think price is the problem. If
whale meat where 5 times the price of beef, hippsters would rush to
buy it. After all, who would eat snails if they costed 2 cents a
pound?
Is anyone else noticing that the "historical background" ends
with:
just as many undoubtedly worried that we were going to run out of whales.
Posited presumably as a laughable comparison, an absurd suggestion,
when THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED.
I feel like a crazy person. I'm the only one clothed in a nudist
colony. This doesn't take a lot of historical knowledge. This
doesn't even take much more than a passing familiarity with
reality. Hell, this doesn't take much more than having seen Star
Trek IV. This is a libertarian blog. I expect everyone here has
seen Star Trek IV.
followup: please make this the latest meme in global warming denialist circles. "huh huh, sure, just like we almost ran out of whales. huh huh." It will make winning arguments much simpler.
MAX HATS,
We didn't run out of whales, we ALMOST ran out of whales. If JDR
didn't start marketing kerosene when he did, there was a good
possibility that we would have indeed run out of whales.
The reason why can be stated by any competent libertarian-leaning
economist: whales were a commons. Without private ownership of
whales it was a rush to get to the whales before your competitor
did. Ditto for the Bison. Bison are no longer in danger of
extinction, because they are now privately owned. We now have the
technology to electronically "brand" whales. Perhaps we should
consider whale ranching.
Brandybuck,
I completely agree. I just implications of the blog post very odd.
It's common knowledge that whales almost went extinct, and it seems
to me this line:
just as many undoubtedly worried that we were going to run out of whales.
flies in the face of that. Furthermore, while American whaling went
into a death spiral from the petroleum industry, it took (horror of
horrors) the environmentalist movement to put the kibbosh on
whaling internationally, leading directly to the whale populations'
recent recovery.
Its my weekly "agree with joe" moment.
Its practically RC'z Second Law - everyone will agree with joe once
per week. Its how he sucks you in.
"If JDR didn't start marketing kerosene when he did, there was a
good possibility that we would have indeed run out of
whales."
I could be mistaken, but I don't believe all whale species were
used as sources of oil.
This is just another stupid KMW post.
KMW,
Okay, the US fleet dropped to thirty-some ships. What about the
rest of the world?
Shitty reporting, as usual.
I got the following quote (in full, I'm sure confident he won't
mind) from this
link. Quote is from April 17, 1870:
As the US Population reaches toward the astronomical total of
40 million persons, we are reaching the limits of the number of
people this earth can support. If one were to extrapolate current
population growth rates, this country in a hundred years could have
over 250 million people in it! Now of course, that figure is
impossible - the farmland of this country couldn't possibly support
even half this number. But it is interesting to consider the
environmental consequences.
Take the issue of transportation. Currently there are over 11
million horses in this country, the feeding and care of which
constitute a significant part of our economy. A population of 250
million would imply the need for nearly 70 million horses in this
country, and this is even before one considers the fact that "horse
intensity", or the average number of horses per family, has been
increasing steadily over the last several decades. It is not
unreasonable, therefore, to assume that so many people might need
100 million horses to fulfill all their transportation needs. There
is just no way this admittedly bountiful nation could support 100
million horses. The disposal of their manure alone would create an
environmental problem of unprecedented magnitude.
Or, take the case of illuminant. As the population grows, the
demand for illuminant should grow at least as quickly. However,
whale catches and therefore whale oil supply has leveled off of
late, such that many are talking about the "peak whale" phenomena,
which refers to the theory that whale oil production may have
already passed its peak. 250 million people would use up the entire
supply of the world's whales four or five times over, leaving none
for poorer nations of the world.
Killing these intelligent animals just to eat 'em? No,
thanks!
Pigs?
There is a fascinating museum of whaling right near Kannapali
Beach on Maui. If you ever get the opportunity to do so, it is
worth a couple of hours.
http://www.whalersvillage.com/museum.htm
I thhink the point is that there is a world wide moritorium on
hunting whales.
Japan and Norway are the big commercial hunters of whales, who
totally ignore this moritorium.
Japan kills whales in a whale sanctuary, Norway kills in a whale
breeding ground.
Killing and trading in endangered species is against CITIES, the
IWC moritorium and is an act of gross inhumanity.
These whales do don't die quickly, they are harpooned by explosive
harpoons, they can then take hours, literarally hours in agony to
die, while sailors take pot shots at them with shot guns; the
equivilent to someone trying to kill you with pins.
The point is that we as humans are yet again responsible for TAKING
and never GIVING.
The seas are polluted, de fished, and dying at our hands. The
Whales are dying because of our use of the sea and because we
choose to go out and kill them for no reason.
No one is going to die of starvation because they do eat whale
meat.
$1.77 a gallon in the mid-1800s? Wow.. I never had any idea
whale oil was that expensive.
-jcr
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245