Matt Welch | March 24, 2008
Can loud-mouthed British performance artists be barred from entering the United States on grounds of "moral turpitude," due to tales of licentious drug use and staged crucifictions from a new tell-all memoir? Even though they claim to be sober for several years now? Yes they can!
reason on the increasingly oxymoronic Visa Waiver program here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
That's not a dandy.
This is a dandy:
http://www.lordwhimsy.com/whimsy/index.html
The way that ICE treats people visiting or working in this
country appalls me. I've seen it first hand as my girlfriend is
European. They just don't give a shit what they put people through;
it's not their problem.
It's fucking embarrassing and there's basically nothing we can do
about it.
So is a fop a kind of dandy or another category entirely?
And even though they weren't exactly fiends, haven't Bill Clinton,
GWB, Obama and who knows who else been involved in drugs before?
Plus with the Spitzer thing it does seem a bit hypocritical.
If he had murdered one thousand prostitutes, instead of having sex with them, he could get a free lunch at the White House.
It's obvious they're trying to protect the vitally important domestic drug-taking and prostitute-buying industry. It's a national security issue. Surely you don't want Eliot Spitzer and thousands of junkies unable to work in this field because some Brit came and took over their jobs? We'd have to pay them welfare or give them free drugs and hookers and as libertarians, we're all against that, right?
Keith Richards Must Be Rolling Over in His Coffin
Ahhh that would explain why you never see him in daylight.
The irony of being denied entrance to Newark, of all places, for moral turpitude is just beyond satire. I can understand not letting this guy into Kansas or Iowa but the tri-state area? Maybe we should start offering all access "heartland visas", and then a "mature audience only visa" that would just allow you to visit New York, San Francisco, New Orleans, Portland and certain strip clubs in Mississippi. We could charge more for the second and the gov could make extra revenue, so win-win!
So is a fop a kind of dandy or another category
entirely?
Lord Whimsy, I believe, has delineated the distinctions between a
"dandy" and a mere "fop."
The Bush Administration spends tens of thousands of dollars to bust a Democratic politician for getting laid and now protects us smart-ass foreigners. This country is on a roll.
I'd hate to think that other countries might begin to return the
favor.
After all, the whole point of travel is to indulge oneself.
All I can say is thank jod for the small government
conservatives.
They have successfully protected us from the ravages of the nanny
state, and folks with a past, again.
Thank jod, that's really all anyone can say, don't you think?
Or, maybe we can say that small government conservatives were the
grifters some of us always thought they were.
Hmmm?
I don't know about all of you, but I feel much safer after reading the article. The amazing thing is that all of the GOPers that denounce these administration antics just aren't getting any press. Neither of them.
I gotta ask, just gotta, to all of those who still call
themselves libertarians, and who supported/support this
administration:
Any body get why I thought ss reform (as well as other issues) was
a bait and switch tactic to get libertarian minded folks on board
for one of the most massive increase of government power and size
in the history of America?
I remember thinking, folks who support Bush are gonna wake up with
a surprise, by supporting his "reforms", we wind up with a gov
whose size, scope and reach, would make Mussolini drool. Ok, it's
not that bad...YET.
Soon though, eh? And those who most claim to hate big gov were some
of it's biggest supporters as it expanded. Oh yea...
Without orgs like CATO and Reason for cover, would the "small gov"
conservatives have ever been able to dismantle what little gov
restraints were left? And much of it in the name of fighting the
nanny state. Why O' why don't libertatians realize that the repubs
want a daddy state, as well as a mommy state (just a 1950's mom)
too?
Fop or Dandy?
I'm thinking dandy. Or in the American parlance, pimp. It's actually amazing how stylish this guy is. I mean, I'd never do that to my lip, but shit.
Or in the American parlance, pimp.
Uh... is that one of those words (like "gay") that means something
totally different if you're under 30? 'Cuz I think I've heard it
used that way, but I would never, ever do it myself.
The irony of being denied entrance to Newark
Perhaps ICE should consider hiring a blue ribbon
panel of high moral individuals like Sharp James
to assure that those Pot Smoking Brits stay out of America.
Uh... is that one of those words (like "gay") that means something totally different if you're under 30? 'Cuz I think I've heard it used that way, but I would never, ever do it myself.
Yeah, as in "Southland Tales". "I'm a pimp. And pimps don't commit
suicide." [wink]
Yeah, as in "Southland Tales".
I don't know what that is, but the name "Seann William Scott"
doesn't inspire a whole lot of confidence.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245