David Weigel | August 23, 2007
So last month the Beltway media gossip site FishbowlDC ran a silly contest to name the hottest print/online and broadcast reporters and the hottest consultant in your nation's capital. There were male and female contests and basically every winner was lifted to the podium by some kind of cheating. The hottest man on radio or TV? Bill Press. Two of my friends, Kriston Capps and Catherine Andrews, won the "off air" contests after their friends on the blog Unfogged created scripts to vote again and again in the easily-rigged poll. (Disclosure: fellow reasonoid Kerry Howley was also a contestant and came in second place, thanks to similar scripts and bots.)
In the grips of either 1)a slow news week deadline crunch or 2)a never-requited crush, Salon's Farhad Manjoo investigated this using spot-on journalistic techniques like "checking old blog posts" and "calling people who were in on the joke." Michael Silence read this and drew exactly the wrong conclusion.
Media caught cheating: Media credibility takes another hit. Would someone please take all the guns out of the hands of the media. My feet are getting sore.
But... the traditional media weren't cheating. Bloggers were cheating to help their friends win a popularity contest. This is a phenomenom literally as old as the internet. Nine years ago John Linnell of They Might Be Giants wrote a New York Times column about how online geek fans got him to the top 10 of People magazine's "Most Beautiful People" poll.
I had already gotten wind of the existence of the poll a few days earlier when I read that Leonardo DiCaprio had been knocked out of the No. 1 spot by a dark horse named Hank the Angry, Drunken Dwarf. The on-line voters, it seemed, had a new, more evolved definition of beauty that gave low marks to standard celebrity good looks. What they really valued was a person's inner beauty. Anyway, that's what I told myself as I went on line to see the results firsthand.
By the time I found the site my name had risen to No. 9, putting me a few E-votes behind Madonna and Kate Winslet and just above Sarah Michelle Gellar, star of the television program "Buffy the Vampire Slayer." Hank the Dwarf was still No. 1, sailing far above Leonardo, and another surprise candidate named Ric Flair was ascending fast. Ric turned out to be a professional wrestler with a large and zealous on-line fan base. For his part, Hank had developed his constituency after appearing on the Howard Stern show.
That's an important factoid because for years Howard Stern fans
flooded these online (and telephone) polls to make Gary the Retard
or Hank the Dwarf or Stuttering John the "sexist man alive" or
"next mayor of Yonkers" or whatever.
This whole thing is silly. Look to your roots, bloggers: Remember
when you weren't just ranting about the MSM all the time, when you
were logging on to play Duke Nukem or engage in firey debates on
alt.spock.fetish. The media didn't rig this silly popularity
contest: Some dudes with websites did. Be proud of that.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I think you could take it a step further and say that whomever most inspires people to cheat on their behalf in online popularity contests is, in fact, the most popular.
Is there something more to this post other than, Geeks dominate the online world? And if there isn't, is it really worth all that verbiage?
Hahahah, reason without Weigel strikes again! It's like a spelling bee without any mistakes!
Are we at reason so inferior that we couldn't propel Kerry to #1? I could build a bot in 10 minutes. I did not know about this contest, however--you're falling down on the job, Weigel.
Epi, I was gonna say......you guys need to sharpen up your bots
and scrips cuz some of the Reason chickies are pretty hot.
Pamela Brown has Mattel stamped on her plastic backside. She from
Newport Beach?
The fact that Howley came in second is prima facie evidence that the contest is flawed and rigged.
She's kinda cute: youtube.com/watch?v=dyyVPUdniPk
Now, for the snark.
Which unlucky intern had to mop up the floor after the "event" was
over?
Instead of doing things like this, perhaps they could concentrate
on trying to correct "journalism" like this:
youtube.com/watch?v=Zsm1JoC_Nfg (cf
worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57203 ).
I did not know about this contest, however--you're falling
down on the job, Weigel.
Weigels will wobble but they won't fall down.
Has Instapundit written his post yet linking to this Michael
Silence guy with some pithy comment about how bloggers have
vanquished the "mainstream media"?
How do you stick one of those eye-rolling emoticons here?
Has Instapundit written his post yet linking to this Michael
Silence guy with some pithy comment about how bloggers have
vanquished the "mainstream media"?
Yup.
I remember that online poll. Me and my fraternity brothers probably contributed a good 20,000 votes to that thing. I guess that makes me like 100 years old in internet years.
TMBG are awesome. Nerd rock all the way, but still
awesome.
Yeah, pointless, but hey - I doubt this article is going to
generate something very meaningful.
I miss Hank. I remember one online contest where the three top
contenders were:
1. Hank, the angry, drunken dwarf
2. Hank the angry drunken dwarf
3. Hank the angry, drunken, dwarf
I support any blog post with a reference to the dirtiest player
in the game RIC FLAIR
WOOOOOOOOOOOO
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245