Jacob Sullum | March 7, 2007
The latest U.N. estimates indicate that Afghanistan's opium crop this year may exceed last year's, which set an all-time record. How we'll know for sure: if former drug czar Barry McCaffrey claims Afghanistan's opium production has been cut in half.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Can we make some sort of Grand Bargain with the DEA? Like, we'll
double their anti-Meth and anti-Ecstasy budgets if they'll halve
their efforts on Opium and Coca?
With a worldwide opiate shortage and serious geopolitical
instability arising, this is becoming incredibly dangerous.
Enough.
On the plus side, it's another club (and a big one) for bashing the Anti-Drug Warriors. Silver lining, ill wind, etc.
Somewhat interesting story on NPR this PM.
Apparently after the overthrow of the Taliban farmers returned to
their fields and produced a bumper crop of wheat.
However US food aid (mostly tons of wheat, mandated to be bought
from US farmers) continued to pour into the country. Wheat prices
collapsed leaving Afghan farmers with wheat in their fields that
was not even worth harvesting.
The next year Afghan wheat farmers made the sensible decision to
put their fields into poppy production.
"Get Set for Another Record Opium Crop"
OK. How would you recommend I do that?
Isaac, fascinating.
Re: Isaac's comment - I've heard the same thing happened in
South America - US food crops over produced by gov't funded farmers
were dumped on South America, leading many farmers in the region to
switch to coca.
Oh, what a tangled web we create - When first we practice to
legislate...
Yea, the UN is so good at all of their others estimates I will
believe this one too.
Is smack cheaper than gum yet? It is 1824 at this post.
I've heard the same thing happened in South America - US
food crops over produced by gov't funded farmers were dumped on
South America...
Actually this is not the first time this refrain has been
sung.
The negative effects of food aid on local farm production has been
observed in a number of countries.
Incidentally the mandate for US food aid to take the form of food
purchased from US farmers is a Congressional mandate which
the Bush Administration is hoping to change. That would like to
have a quarter of the food aid budget diverted to purchase crops
from countries closer to where food emergencies occur in the hope
that they might be able to reduce delivery lag times. For example
they would have loved to purchase some of the Afghan wheat surplus
for use as food aid but current rules would not allow that.
When asked about the likelihood of a change in the law the current
Chairman of the Agricultural Committee (from Minnesota) replied
"Not gonna happen". (sigh), I suppose that a Congressman from MN is
as likely to be in favor of changing farm policy as one from FL is
to change on Cuba policy.
We should do what we did for Turkish opium in the '50s--arrange
for the entire crop to be bought by morphine manufacturers.
What with there being a war and all, painkillers seem like a good
thing to lay in a supply of.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245