Brian Doherty | March 2, 2007
Xeni Jardin at Boing-Boing lets us know: "John Edwards Assaulted by Poo-Slinging Communists." Alas, it's only true in the Interweb fantasyland Second Life. More details from the Edwards camp.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Maybe we should go trash Ron Paul's 2L HQ? If he doesn't have
one, we'll make him one,...and then we'll trash it with.......uh,
photoshopped pictures of Ayn Rand giving Alan Greenspan head...or
something.
sorry for the imagery
Objectivists don't give head. Too altruistic.
Perhaps as part of an agreed-upon exchange of services and/or
specie?
tarran, I'm printing that article out for my wife. Or at least the headline (no pun intended).
Any Objectivist will give you head when you show them the "$" tattooed on your "cigarette."
"Objectivists don't give head. Too altruistic."
Couldn't it be an expression of love to someone who shares your
values?
...and at this very moment some politician is drafting legislation to extend campaign finance reform to virtual worlds. I wonder how many Linden dollars I'll be able to contribute to a candidate??
I'm wondering what in lord's name would want the Edwards campaign to have a Second Life campaign area. Being connected with social networks like youtube, myspace, and facebook makes sense as they actually have practical value of connecting to voters, but from what I understand Second Life is only a moderatly popular MMORPG without the "RPG" or any decent human beings on it.
Jonathan,
For the next few years, political campaigns will be run by people
who know they have to take advantage of the internet, but don't
know enough about to tell a good idea from a stupid one when one of
the kids who can make the computer work comes up them all excited
about something.
We're being ruled by people who can't open a .pdf.
joe,
Truer words have never been spoken. It's even scarier every time
one of these clueless jackasses launches some new bill to "fix" the
internet.
I think the poo story is going to be upstaged a bit by Ann Coulter's having just called Edwards a "faggot" in her speech at CPAC.
When will conservatives realize that Ann Coulter is actually a communist plant in the conservative movement bent on destroying it from within?
I don't think we'll ever really discover the driving force behind Coulter other than the fact that she barely means what she says. People say that she's a agent provocateur, desprate for attetion, or doing it all for the money, but I think the answer is darker than that. Like, maybe, at birth, she was killed by a astroid with dark matter in it, killing her instantly but their was so much energy in that astriod that it made the corpse of Coulter move, speak, and grow and it is ultimately a coincidence that abritary convusling and shreiking of a atomic-powered corpse resembles a screaming, hysterical, harpy.
I think the poo story is upstaged by any of the following:
Total eclipse will turn Moon red
Village requires snow shoveling
Route 60 closed at crossing
Fire damages townhouse
Students make discoveries at Cotton Creek Science Night
Jonathan,
"...from what I understand Second Life is only a moderatly popular
MMORPG without the "RPG" or any decent human beings on it."
If by 'moderately popular' you mean 'pretty near the bottom of the
games anyone's even heard about, and below some you've never heard
of', then that's probably accurate.
But they get vastly more media attention then their actual
relevance warrants. In the industry, they're basically a joke. In
the MMO segment of the industry, they're an annoying joke with an
off-color punchline.
I think the poo story is going to be upstaged a bit by Ann
Coulter's having just called Edwards a "faggot" in her speech at
CPAC.
link? context? transcript?
far too mild an epithet for the Breck girl
"far too mild an epithet for the Breck girl"
Ahh, someone has been Listening to Rush Limbaugh. I enjoy his show
myself, I think he is funny. I also heard him say not long ago that
he and Camile Paglia were very close friends. I think the way he
described it was they were "best buds." Maybe, just maybe, she can
turn him libertarian. Just a hope I have.
I am far more concerned, however, that Oak Park is going to start fining me if I don't shovel my sidewalk.
Hmmm. Here's some stats about Second Life. You be the judged of
how popular that means it is.
- 4 million registered accounts
- 30,000 concurrent residents (on Feb. 1)
- 144,108 people spent game money in Dec.
Here's a chart
of games with a comparable number of registered users. (Here's a
chart of games
with the highest number of registered users.)
Remember that Second Life is not a game, per se. It is a virtual
world, more akin to the Sims online offerings. It is not
necessarily appropriate to compare it to WoW when measuring whether
it is "popular" or not.
What is undeniable is that it is growing quickly. Many games and
virtual worlds are not.
Does anybody know what lead to the sharp decline in EverQuest? I find that the most interesting stat on the chart.
I think the Breck Girl label was popularised by
members of the executive branch (Cheney?) during the last
Presidential campaign before Limbaugh picked up on it
Limbaugh is quite libertarian for a prominent conservative.
I'm too impatient to wait for the open thread this weekend.
What's the libertarian position on incest?
http://www.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/video/world/2007/03/02/pleitg.incestuous.love.cnn
Those second Life stats make it look pretty irrelevant.I'll go
with empiricism and anecdote.
Despite having heard of it and seeing quite a bit of promotion and
hype-I don't know anyone who is an active user.
Chalupa
Unless it involves force fraud or coercion...
Consenting Adults = No business of the State.
No doubt some may disagree for other reasons but
I can't see any other libertarian position.
"Does anybody know what lead to the sharp decline in EverQuest?
I find that the most interesting stat on the chart."
I assumed they switched to WoW - or went into rehab.
If two bothers or two sisters want to go at it - no problem because there is a zero chance of a child being born with genetic problems. If you are talking about a brother and sister or a father and daughter my view is different. My view on this is the same as my view on a pregnant mother drinking to excess. It can harm the children who had no say in the matter. .
Isn't that the one where the french were having riots in front of the national front headquarters? with the preponderance of libertarians on the internet, maybe we can create a libertarian protest about something, dang, blog battles can be settled by fighting in this simulated world, we totally would have kicked pandercorn's ass in a rumble in that game, you reading this tsz?!!? are you still creating havoc at hit and run you little devil you? ROFLOL!!!
Yea, agree with you two above. Children just complicates things.
How do you allow people to have sex but at they can't have kids?
Tell them they can suck, play and have sex with condoms but make it
illegal to have sex without?
So homosexual incest is ok, while heterosexual incest should remain
illegal. Those who want to be exempted have to get their tubes tied
or have a vasectomy.
Those Germans are sick fucks for the fact that they had a kid with
disabilities and then continued to have more. Inexcusable.
One more interesting thing about this. I remember reading in one
of Steven Pinker's books that not having sexual interest in your
siblings may have evolved in humans. It turns out that people who
are raised together don't have sexual feelings for each other when
they get older. Basically our genes don't know by looking at
someone if they're our relative or not so we just evolved not to be
interested in people we are raised with.
That's interesting because this story seems to back up this
hypothesis. The Germans only met as teenagers and then became
involved.
- 4 million registered accounts
- 30,000 concurrent residents (on Feb. 1)
- 144,108 people spent game money in Dec.
I'm one of those "registered users." I also found out after
registering that my video card doesn't isn't supported by Second
Life. From reading various forums, I know I'm not the only one (far
from it), so while there may be that many people interested in
Second Life, the 4 million registered accounts is a meaningless
statistic.
Chalupa,
There have been a few cases of people "gaming the system" as sperm
donors so as to have hundreds if not thousands of children. Should
we require genetic testing before marriage?
I oppose progressive policies like eugenics.
I think the State has no business interfering with people who carry
congentital defect genes from reproducing- Tay sachs, Sickle Cell,
Deafness,polydactilism whatever.
Incestuous offspring have a higher risk of genetic defect but it is
not as likely as many believe. That is the way animal breeds are
created.
Back to your original question, I can't see any libertarian reason
for using the Force of the State to prevent sexual relations or
child bearing by related consenting adults. As with other issues of
morality and personal behavior I have no problem with individuals
or "Society" condemning it and expressing their view through
non-State social sanctions.
I didn't check your link but there was something on this over at
Volokh regarding an American case with people who were related
legally but not biologically. The Kraut brother/sister couple were
referenced in the comments.
"That is the way animal breeds are created."
Not exactly, that is part of a long process but only a part. Dog
breeders themselves are very careful about inbreeding and
discourage it in most instances. And taking your analogy further I
would also like to point out that in many dog breeds there are
known genetic defects (i.e. collie eye) and some breeds are more
likely to be aggressive.
PIRS
As I stated, propensity for genetic defects is no legitimate reason
for the State to try to stop it.Unless you support eugenics.
No force, fraud or coercion + consenting adults
= none of the State's business.
Does your current nom refer to the White List policiy? I support
exotic diversity.
Bet you money the somethingawful.com guys are behind the edwards
thing. They've made a habit of staging pranks like that on Second
Life then posting articles about it. The details of the vandalism
sound like stuff they would think was funny.
So give it a week see what happens.
And 2nd Life gets the attention it does because as far as I know
it's the most free form and by far the most R rated MMO game out
there. Plus people are making a quite good living selling and
renting in-game land.
And no, never played it.
As I stated, propensity for genetic defects is no legitimate reason
for the State to try to stop it.Unless you support
eugenics.
Sorry, I break ranks with hardcore libertarians here.
In 99% of situations I think freedom is the best option.
But in those extreme circumstances, like when people are popping
out retarted kids or a society is being Islamisized into a new dark
age (see Europe) then its time for men with guns to tell people
what to do.
So should men with guns force all people with known genetic
defects not to reproduce?
Eugenics
Chalupa,
Should have saved this one for the open thread. " Legalizing Incest
between consenting adults" is a great Issue for ferreting out those
"statist-roaders".
Should have saved this one for the open thread. " Legalizing Incest
between consenting adults" is a great Issue for ferreting out those
"statist-roaders".
I don't know what statist-roaders are, but I'll meet you at the
open thread if you like.
"Does your current nom refer to the White List policiy? I
support exotic diversity."
Yes, it does, and I am very glad to hear you support the plants
that just want to come here to live a better life. Most plants are
NOT here get on government programs, most of them have come here to
work, to live productive lives. These are plants that provide us
most of the food we have on our tables.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245