Brian Doherty | January 5, 2007
From Jon Healey's "Bit Player" blog , on "Hollywood's love/hate relationship with technology":
The numbers from Nielsen SoundScan are in, and for the first time, the number of downloadable albums sold (32.6 million) more than offset the decline in physical CD sales (-30.7 million).
Me from Reason's March 2004 issue on why music industry cries that the Internet and file-sharing were killing them softly were premature--and nothing more than the same old song, with a lazy new rhyme or two.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Christopher---It took me a few seconds to sink in, but you win the comment prize for the week.
Whereas copyrights are still the law, it will be ordered that Christopher Monnier (party of the second part)remitt to Warren (party of the first part) the entire cash value of the comment prize awarded the first week in January 2007.
I still say we should do away with copyright
altogether.
Spoken, almost always, by individuals who have never created
anything of value.
Sigh...I always say I'm not going to get involved in this debate
but...
It does not matter whether the industry is being hurt. No argument
that focuses on whether the industry is growing or expanding, or
whether current music sucks, or whether profit margins on CD's are
too large are relevant to the larger issue.
Property is being taken without compensation, against the wishes of
the property owner.
Spoken, almost always, by individuals who have never created
anything of value.
I have, and I'm still in favor of doing away with copyright. You
see, it's copyright law that keeps me from publishing my Star Trek
slash novel. I... I've said to much already.
Seriously, there are plenty of great works that are derivative.
When copyright is finally reformed, there will be a creative
explosion like none other. This "Life of the Disney Corporation
plus 70 years" thing as got to end.
Property is being taken without compensation, against the
wishes of the property owner.
That's a good argument for compensating current copyright holders,
but not for changing copyright law prospectively.
Property rights are not self-defining.
Property is being taken without compensation, against the
wishes of the property owner.
Yes. And when the middle-man (e.g. the record company) realizes it
has become vastly less important than it thinks it is, and cedes
its piles of cash to the rightful owner (the artist), everyone will
be happy. Right? Right...?
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245