L.A. Lifts Mural Ban

License to paint

In August, the Los Angeles City Council voted 13-2 to overturn a decade-long ban on large public murals, the end result of years of hearings on what sort of regulations should govern the artwork.

The ban was first introduced in order to tackle what many thought was a problem: advertisements designed to look like art. According to the Los Angeles Times, the new rules, which at the time of writing are awaiting final approval, would allow for new murals in business and industrial zones provided that the artist registers with the city and pays a fee. The artwork will not be allowed to include commercial messaging and must stay up for at least two years. In residential areas, individuals will have to seek permission from the city in order to be allowed to put murals on houses.

The rules governing the painting of murals on private residences in L.A. were given some publicity after neighbors' complaints prompted the pop star Chris Brown t0 remove the massive paintings of fanged monsters decorating a wall at his house.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement