Obama's Orwellian Doublespeak on the Drone Program

The president claims to be troubled by his signature program on the war on terror

President Barack Obama has decided to deal with revelations about the Justice Department’s spying on journalists and other scandals by changing the subject. In a major national security address last Thursday, he announced the phase out of the Guantanamo prison facility and the CIA’s oversight of the drone program. But these are cosmetic changes that can’t conceal the biggest scandal: His record on the war on terrorism, which is arguably even more draconian than George W. Bush’s, his angst notwithstanding

The question is whether liberals will protect their principles or their man.

What was remarkable about Obama’s speech was its complete disconnect with his own actions in office. In a textbook example of Orwellian doublespeak, he declared that America would be haunted by the civilian casualties produced by drone attacks — without noting that these attacks were the defining feature of his war on terror. 

As atonement, he pledged to transfer oversight of the drone program from the CIA to the Pentagon. But the problem with the program is not who runs it but what it does.

The theory behind transferring the program is that lawmakers will be able to offer more effective oversight given that Congressional defense committees have more power to extract information from the Pentagon than intelligence committees from the CIA, explains Cato Institute’s Benjamin Friedman, a defense expert. But the ingeniousness of the drone program is that even if Congress can provide more oversight, it will have little incentive to actually do so.

Why?

Invasion of foreign countries — like Bush’s misadventure in Iraq — risk American blood and treasure and therefore invite domestic scrutiny. Not so with the drone program that has made the war on terror virtually costless to Americans; drones, after all, are cheap and unmanned.

This has enabled the administration to vastly expand both the size and scope of the program without raising an eyebrow outside of civil libertarian circles.

It has escalated drone strikes against alleged militants along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. According to the liberal AlterNet, the Bush administration conducted 52 drone strikes in this region killing 438 people, including 182 civilians. This administration ordered 300 strikes in just its first term, killing 2,152 people, including 260 civilians. The constant buzzing in the sky traumatizes the local population — and violates Pakistani sovereignty — all of which has caused America’s popularity in Pakistan to plummet from 36 percent under Bush to 24 percent under Nobel-Peace-Prize-winner Obama.

But the administration hasn’t just expanded the number of drone strikes but also their geographical footprint, a fact that somehow didn’t make it into the president’s address. Its battlefield now extends to Somalia and Yemen.  In Yemen, the president has used what are called “signature strikes” against anyone who “signs up” for al Qaeda — and not because they threaten America but its ally, the Yemeni government. In other words, Obama’s drones have become a tool for protecting an authoritarian government in a quasi civil war. Talk about mission creep! The president is promising to end such strikes but what are such promises worth when no one is holding him accountable?

Equally meaningless is President Obama’s move to belatedly close the Guantanamo facility. President Bush needed a place to warehouse “enemy combatants” captured in the battlefield. But Obama can close it because drone strikes take no prisoners. Strikes under Obama have killed four times more people than Bush imprisoned in Guantanamo.

Cato’s Friedman maintains that the president’s efforts to move the drone program and phase out Gitmo might actually make matters worse by creating an impression that the worst excesses of the war on terrorism are over. But to make that a reality it won’t be enough to simply create another executive bureaucracy to oversee the presidential kill list and oversee the program, as Obama suggested.

Friedman notes, Congress itself should have to authorize every strike -- drone or otherwise — which would require it to end the blanket authorization to the use of military force it handed the president post 9/11.

But that won’t happen on its own.

If former Vice President Dick Cheney had authored the drone program, liberals would demand his indictment as a war criminal. But Obama does so and they remain silent.  

When Bush departed from bedrock conservative principles and started spending like a drunken sailor, he triggered a revolt that ultimately culminated in the Tea Party movement. It remains to be seen if liberals will hold Obama similarly accountable.

A version of this column originally appeared in the Washington Examiner.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Gilbert Martin||

    Doublespeak on drones, eh?

    Is there ANY subject that Obama doesn't engage in double speak on?

  • Aceeakel||

    Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job Ive had. Last Monday I got a new Alfa Romeo from bringing in $7778. I started this 9 months ago and practically straight away started making more than $83 per hour. I work through this link, www.Mojo50.com

  • Alyna_Cleo||

    If you think Harold`s story is impossible,, last pay check my auntie's best friend worked and got paid $4644 sitting there a 10 hour week an their house and there buddy's step-mother`s neighbour was doing this for 4 months and got a cheque for over $4644 in there spare time from there labtop. follow the guide available on this page, Click Here

  • Lord Humungus||

    white black man speaks with forked tongue.

  • Dweebston||

    Invasion of foreign countries — like Bush’s misadventure in Iraq — risk American blood and treasure and therefore invite domestic scrutiny.

    But I thought Reason is Republican-lite, a secret booster for the former president, and any scrutiny must be directed at the sitting president. A lurking troll tells me so, like, all the time.

  • LTC(ret) John||

    No, no! They are Comsmotarianz, who always have to put in some snipe at BOOOSH, or something.

  • SugarFree||

    We are all things to all crazy people.

  • UnCivilServant||

    We are all things to all crazy people

    That's better.

  • Anders||

    His actions are pretty consistent. In almost every case he would much rather execute baddies using drones. This does naturally result in lost opportunities to gather intelligence, but he's far more afraid of the ACLU, Soros, hard left Democrats, and some Reason readers than he is interested in finding out about all the messy stuff.

    He can check a few boxes on the kill list in the morning then head out for golf and a Turkish Bath with Sheriff Joe.

  • zafina502||

    Charlotte. I just agree... Chris`s report is neat, I just got a brand new Mini Cooper after having earned $7723 this - 4 weeks past and would you believe, ten grand last munth. it's by-far the most financially rewarding Ive ever done. I began this 3 months ago and pretty much immediately started bringing in minimum $70, per/hr. I use the details on this website.....grand4.com
    (Go to site and open "Home" for details)

  • AlgerHiss||

    You must give this little high school pot head credit: He's developed a quite impressive, theatrical delivery system for drivel and twaddle.

    To get the REAL fellow, do not listen to him. Read a transcript. You'll be left scratching your head wondering what the Hell is being said.

  • JWatts||

    EPIC FAIL:

    It's not Doublespeak when the President speaks. It's Truespeak. Someone is overdue for a trip to a federally funded nature camp so that they can better understand these distinctions.

  • Dweebston||

    What is the U.S. equivalent of Siberia? Montana?

  • Pro Libertate||

    Very northern, inland Alaska of course.

  • JWatts||

    Meh, the Red States are all a barren wilderness thinly populated with bitter, gun wielding, religious freaks. Deciding the best location to fully enjoy the vigors of nature is and administrative detail. Those kind of details are better delegated to low level agents. Like the one's in Cincinnati.

  • Earlycuyler||

    "When Bush departed from bedrock conservative principles and started spending like a drunken sailor...."

    Quit insulting inebriated sailors. The spending habits of Chimpy McBush and the Jug-eared Jesus have put them to shame.

  • Anonymous Coward||

    Friedman notes, Congress itself should have to authorize every strike -- drone or otherwise — which would require it to end the blanket authorization to the use of military force it handed the president post 9/11.

    But that would mean Congresscritters would have to take responsibility for something. Aqua Buddha forfend that they spend less of their time not reading bills, raising funds, or attending teh Koktale Parteez!

  • melissabutler350||

    my roomate's mother makes $84/hour on the internet. She has been out of a job for 9 months but last month her payment was $14816 just working on the internet for a few hours. Read more on this site... http://www.Taz1.com

  • Sevo||

    "The question is whether liberals will protect their principles or their man."
    Liberals don't have principles to protect, so this isn't even a question.

  • Tejicano||

    Yeah, I was wondering what principles he was referring to. Their one, true driving emotion is to follow and support the party. I guess it may suffice as a principle but that would be the only one.

  • the wolf||

    They aren't principles; they're merely clubs with which to beat Republican presidents.

  • barbararose44||

    my best friend's mother makes $78 every hour on the laptop. She has been out of a job for six months but last month her paycheck was $19742 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Read more here... http://www.Taz1.com

  • Charles Bird||

    Obama made no mention of the CIA in his speech, so I see no direct assurance from Obama that drone strikes will transfer from CIA to Defense. I'm sure that he left out the reference to "CIA" for a reason.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement