6 Reasons Why States Should Continue to Oppose Obamacare

States can block many of the law's worst provisions and most troubling consequences.

WhiteHouse.govWhiteHouse.govOver the past year, 34 states have decided against implementing some, or any, parts of Obamacare’s health insurance exchanges—and with good reason. As Cato Institute Health Policy Director Michael Cannon argues in his recent paper “50 Vetoes: How States Can Stop the Obama Health Care Law,” states have the power to block many of Obamacare’s most troublesome provisions and consequences simply by refusing to participate in the implementation process. Cannon’s paper provides an array of reasons why state legislators should resist the law. Here are six: 

1. Neither the exchanges nor the Medicaid expansion are mandatory. Obamacare’s authors gave states the option of setting up exchanges. But they did not—and could not—make it mandatory, because the Supreme Court has has ruled that the Constitution does not allow the federal government to “commandeer” states into such actions. 

2. The “deadlines” for choosing to implement the exchanges aren’t real deadlines at all—so states can always create exchanges later if they choose to do so. States were originally told they had to submit their exchange proposals by November 2012. That supposed deadline was eventually pushed back to December and, earlier this year, the bureaucrat who runs the agency in charge of certifying the state exchanges, Gary Cohen, admitted “there is no deadline.” States could get approval whenever they were ready. Indeed, one of the law’s architects and key backers, MIT health economist Jonathan Gruber, recently told officials in Florida that there was no reason to proceed with exchange creation in 2014.

3. Refusing to create an exchange potentially protects a state’s businesses from the law’s employer mandate. Obamacare fines any business with 50 or more employees that does not offer health coverage of sufficient value—as determined by the federal government—$2,000 per employee (exempting the first 30 workers).  The employer penalties, however, are triggered by the existence of the law’s subsidies for private health insurance. And as Cannon notes, the text of Obamacare specifically states that those subsidies are only available in states that choose to create their own exchanges. The IRS has issued a rule allowing for subsidies in states that reject the exchanges, but a lawsuit is already under way to challenge it. 

4. States also have the power to protect as many as 12 million people from the law’s individual mandate—the “tax” it charges individuals for not carrying health insurance. Obamacare requires that nearly everyone maintain health coverage or pay a penalty—a “tax,” according to the Supreme Court’s decision upholding the law last year. But Obamacare also exempts individuals who would have to pay more than 8 percent of their household income for their share of their health insurance premiums. So if states bow out of the exchanges, and as a result the law’s private insurance subsidies are no longer available, then the mandate will no longer apply to the low and middle income individuals who would have to pay more than 8 percent of their income to get health insurance. Cannon estimates that if all 50 states were to decline to create exchanges, a little more than 12 million low and middle-income individuals would be exempt from the law’s mandate.

5. Collectively, states have the power to reduce federal spending by $1.2 trillion if they reject Obamacare’s exchanges. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the exchanges will dole out $1.2 trillion in subsidies for private health insurance by 2023. But if the lawsuit against the IRS wins, and the explicit text of the law prevails, then no state exchanges would mean no subsidies for private insurance—saving the entire $1.2 trillion.

6. States that agree to run their own exchanges will take the blame if they fail. It’s not just that information about the exchange could arrive bearing the state’s name and letterhead. It’s also that state officials could end up on the hook with the public if Obamacare results in care being denied to the sick. And that, Cannon writes, is a real possibility. Because the law includes price controls that force insurers to sell coverage to the sick at less than it costs to insure them, insurers who provide the best care to the sick will soon attract large numbers of very sick individuals, and may suffer financially for it. Premiums will go up, and healthier individuals will avoid the plan. "In this way," Cannon writes, "the Act’s community-rating price controls literally punish health plans that provide the most attractive coverage to the sick. The Act thus forces health plans into a race to the bottom, where insurers compete to avoid, mistreat, and dump the most vulnerable patients.” 

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Pro Libertate||

    Help me, Obi-Wan Federalism. You're my only hope.

  • ||

    You are a part of the Rebel Alliance and a traitor, take him away!

  • andrew79||

    Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job Ive had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringin home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, Mojo50.com

  • JPohl||

    The 2014 Elections are going to be inpacted one way or another due to Obamacare. It is slightly unpopular now but depending on how the implementation is handled, it may become wildly unpopular.

    The article http://obamacareaca.com/obamac.....he-joness/ discusses what to look for in the next several months and how it will affect the election of 2014...and maybe beyond

  • LTC(ret) John||

    Dear Sen. Reid,

    Fuck off, slaver.

    Sincerely,
    Me

  • LTC(ret) John||

    Whoops - wrong thread. But I guess the sentiment can still stand.

  • ||

    It's hard to imagine a thread where that statement wouldn't fit perfectly.

  • grey||

    Hell, I'll give it a "+1" for making me smile.

    Saying Fuck You Harry Reid, means never having to say you're sorry.

  • Arminda321||

    If you think Norma`s story is unimaginable..., 3 weeks ago my girl friends mom basically also earned $5547 just sitting there twelve hour's a week at home and the're buddy's sister-in-law`s neighbour has done this for 4 months and got more than $5547 part-time at their computer. use the advice from this website... kep2.com

  • CampingInYourPark||

    "Baucus warns of 'huge train wreck' enacting ObamaCare provisions

    http://thehill.com/blogs/healt.....z2QkD2kTWL

  • forestgombosi39||

    Brody. I can see what your saying... Earl`s blog is amazing, last friday I got themselves a Jaguar E-type since getting a cheque for $4865 this-past/five weeks and-in excess of, ten grand this past month. this is certainly my favourite job Ive ever had. I actually started five months/ago and straight away startad bringin home at least $87 per-hr. I work through this link tinyurl.com/d8v6duz
    (Go to site and open "Home" for details)

  • FireDrake||

    Don't get me wrong, I'm against Obamacare and want to see it repealed. That said your item #6 is not correct. Obamacare forces health insurance companies with a healthier pool of members to fund the companies with more unhealthy members. So a company that provides the best care to the sick will receive funds from the government that they have confiscated/taxed from companies with the healthier members. I work for a health insurer and have been involved with having to implement some of the regulations this law has placed on us.

  • grey||

    I can no longer count on a rate calculated within my own insurance pool, but subsidizing those in other insurance pools?

    Why does Obamacare make me feel like somebody touched me in my private place?

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    Cannon estimates that if all 50 states were to decline to create exchanges, a little more than 12 million low and middle-income individuals would be exempt from the law’s mandate.

    Without the mandate, can private insurance companies survive Obamacare?

  • FireDrake||

    Health insurance companies would survive, but the Individual market may not and the insurance companies would shrink some. This really only impacts the ability to cover an individual or small business. Larger businesses who provide coverage for their employees should be enough to keep insurers in business. It will make our uninsured problem worse, though since it will be harder to find a plan if you're buying coverage for yourself or a small business.

  • sandrajacob2||

    If you think Matthew`s story is unbelievable,, 3 weaks-ago my uncles best friend basically also broght in $4885 sitting there twenty hours a week at home and the're neighbor's sister-in-law`s neighbour done this for 9-months and earned over $4885 parttime on- line. apply the tips at this site...
    http://www.big76.com

  • Avery56||

    until I looked at the paycheck 4 $4331, I be certain ...that...my neighbours mother woz like they say truley earning money in their spare time from their laptop.. there neighbor started doing this less than six months and just cleard the depts on there house and bought Chrysler. I went here, http://www.wow92.com

  • WomSom||

    That sounds like a plan dude. I like it.

    www.AnonHit.tk

  • JPohl||

    The 2014 Elections are going to be inpacted one way or another due to Obamacare. It is slightly unpopular now but depending on how the implementation is handled, it may become wildly unpopular.

    The article http://obamacareaca.com/obamac.....he-joness/ discusses what to look for in the next several months and how it will affect the election of 2014...and maybe beyond

  • hannah65||

    my classmate's half-sister makes 66 an hour on the internet. She has been fired for five months but last month her check was 16213 just working on the internet for a few hours. Read more on this site http://www.wow92.com

  • Chuckie||

    The reason to resist is etched in history - the federal government starts the entitlement, getting people dependent on it, then gradually slips away.
    First expenses fall on the state, then the state shifts it to the county, who shifts it to the city.
    But at the end of the line, it lands in the taxpayers lap.

    The result? A new entitlement on automatic pilot, sucking the life out of every taxpayer.

  • caroljonathan||

    my best friend's mother makes $75/hour on the . She has been laid off for nine months but last month her pay was $15902 just working on the for a few hours. Read more here
    http://www.big76.com

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement