The Washington Redskins Are About to Fleece Virginia Taxpayers

The third richest professional sports team in the world will receive nearly $7 million in subsidies to train in Virginia.

The announcement that the Washington Redskins will move their training camp to Richmond was met with mixed emotions, as they say. It’s certainly great news for Virginia’s capital city. Virginians across the state are happy the Skins will not decamp to Maryland. On the other hand, a fair number are shocked at the public funds being lavished on the team.

The Old Dominion will give the Skins $4 million; Loudoun County (home to the team’s headquarters) will give them another $2 million, and Richmond will kick in $400,000.  All this for “the third-richest sports franchise on the planet behind British soccer giant Manchester United and the Dallas Cowboys,” as Richmond Times-Dispatch columnist Jeff Schapiro noted a week ago.

Nineteen of the team’s players have base contracts worth more than the $4 million state subsidy. This is not a pirouette gracefully executed by Virginia’s Republican governor, Bob McDonnell, who ostensibly opposes big government and wasteful spending. McDonnell spent his first year in office trying to privatize ABC stores because he believes—correctly—the state should not be in the liquor business. This year he won his campaign to reduce public funding for public broadcasting.

At the height of the public-radio debate last spring, the governor argued that "in today's free market, with hundreds of radio and television programs, government should not be subsidizing one particular group of stations. We must get serious about government spending. That means funding our core functions well, and eliminating spending on programs and services that should be left to the private sector.”

Amen to that. But there is at least a case to be made for public broadcasting. Supporters say it provides content otherwise unavailable to the viewing and listening public. Without public money, goes the argument, rare and special voices would fall silent.

No such case can be made about football, one of the most popular forms of entertainment in America. (Precisely why it remains so popular is a mystery to those of us who prefer mixed martial arts. In comparison to K-1 or the Ultimate Fighting Championship, football seems like a series of long rest breaks  interrupted by occasional committee meetings. But that is a diatribe for another day.) Why can’t the Skins practice here simply because this is a good place, with a lot of diehard fans? Richmond isn’t Chicago or Paris, but it isn’t a poke in the eye with a sharp stick, either.

Is there anything to be said on behalf of the Skins handout? Yes—and McDonnell said it in a recent interview. While conceding “it’s not the role of government to subsidize sports,” he argued that the Redskins generate more than $200 million in economic activity in Virginia, along with nearly $10 million in taxes. The Skins’ departure would be “a huge economic hit.”

Hmmmm. Spending tax money in order to collect more of it is the dubious rationale of those who have been in government too long. As for the economic benefits of sports subsidies, they are hugely overblown—as a library full of studies from sources as ideologically diverse as the Cato Institute and the Brookings Institution can attest.

Regarding lesser subsidies like the one going to the Skins, it is helpful to place them in the broader context of other handouts—such as the many given to Hollywood production companies (last year Virginia gave billionaire Steven Spielberg $4.6 million to film part of “Lincoln” here), corporate giants (e.g., the $6.9 million Virginia doled out for Microsoft), and smaller beneficiaries such as wine makers and beekeepers.

Advocates plump for each of these government redistributions in isolation. But as the Hungarian philosopher Anthony de Jasay noted, redistribution has proliferated to such an extent that it is impossible for anyone to tell, on balance, whether he or she is better off. A “Lincoln” extra  might get a marginal slice of the tax money granted by Virginia—only to see it taken back, with interest, for sports stadiums, corporate headquarters, agribusiness crops, and so on.

There is another, non-economic argument for the Redskins subsidy: Bringing the Skins to Richmond will help boost civic pride and elevate Central Virginia’s stature. No doubt there is something to this – nobody in Richmond considers the move bad news, after all. And city residents will be pleased by the chance to watch the team practice in their back yard. But a principle of good management says you should define success in terms that can be measured. Pride and stature can’t be.

Granted, Virginia remains the most populous state without a single major-league team to call its own. Yet Maryland—which has both the Baltimore Orioles and the Ravens and which hosts the Skins at FedEx Field in Prince George’s County—has seen an exodus of corporations and citizens moving to the Old Dominion. As a May article on Reason.com noted, Virginia has beat out its neighbor to the north in every major corporate relocation contest in the past few years. Sports are swell, but they aren’t everything.

Football fans will be delighted to have the Skins in town a few weeks out of the year. But when it comes to the subsidy, even some longtime fans can’t help agreeing with State Sen. Chap Petersen—a season ticket holder—when he called it “corporate welfare at its finest.”

A. Barton Hinkle is a columnist at the Richmond Times-Dispatch, where this article originally appeared.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • ||

    They're also stealing r's and s's!

  • ||

    Damn you Hinkle, trying to make me look the fool with your damn editing!

  • Almanian's Evil Twin||

    Q: "Arse and asses?!"

    A: "Yes - like Dallas, Texas!"

  • Almanian's Evil Twin||

    It'll be worth it if I can see Joe Theismann's OTHER leg get snapped like a twig.

    That asshole deserves it.

    Oh, that's not part of the deal? Then ya'll are gettin' RIPPED OFF...

  • EDG reppin' LBC||

    Joe Theismann has trouble peeing, so he uses saw palmetto, apparently.

  • Almanian's Evil Twin||

    Those ads are what drove me over the edge.

    I used to just hate him in the generic "he's an annoying dick" way. Then the commercials - now it's full on "BREAK HIS FUCKIN LEGS NOW" hate.

  • JW||

    So, you didn't enjoy the service you received at Joe Theismann's Restaurant?

  • ||

    That reminds me...I went on date a couple years ago during March Madness to Joe Theisman's, and they put the American U game on a TV just for me. So I can't be hatin' on Joe.

  • ChrisO||

    Why shouldn't the entire commonwealth share equally in the Redskins misery us Northern Virginians get to enjoy several months per year? Spread the wealth!

  • John||

    Dan Snyder is George Costanza if Costanza had made a billion dollars in the direct mailing business.

  • JW||

    He's such an angry little person.

  • ChrisO||

    Here is some mandatory reading for anyone unfamiliar with the Lord God King Douchebag owner of the Washington Redskins:

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.....dan-snyder

    The entry under "Bankrupt airline peanuts" is my personal favorite.

  • John||

    I love that article. God what a smarmy awful bastard.

  • ||

    One of the best things the WCP has ever printed. And watching little Danny's public tantrum following it was even awesomer.

  • ||

    Careful Barty - I hear Danny S. is quite the litigious little troll.

  • Mike M.||

    Yep, George Allen's family sure carries a lot of sway in Virginia. They're sort of a minor league version of the Bush family.

  • ||

    The third richest professional sports team in the world

    Citation needed. I know the Redskins are up there considering how terrible they are but I'm pretty sure they are behind at least the Cowboys, Yankees, Manchester United, Barcelona and Real Madrid.

  • John||

    Don't forget the Dodgers who just went for over a billion dollars. No way are the Redskins worth what the Dodgers are. And how could they possibly be worth more than the Giants?

  • ||

    Wow, forbes list last year but the redskins at 4th:

    http://www.forbes.com/pictures.....erycontent

    I don't think this year's list is out yet but they have done soccer already and the big clubs there have all made big gains:

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/mi.....ccer-team/

    Still crazy, how are the Redskins worth that much?

  • ChrisO||

    Dan Snyder owns both the Redskins and the stadium, so he gets 100% of the revenue. That's the gist of it.

    Also, they've been sold-out (apart from the "club seats") for decades, though the waiting list for season tickets is rumored to be much shorter than it used to be.

  • KDN||

    Do the Skins have to deal with the awe-inspiring misery of PSL's? If not, I'd expect him to institute it soon. That'll clear up the remaining wait list right quick (the Jets' wait list dropped from 5-7 years' to nil once they helped build that abortion in the swamp).

  • Montani Semper Liberi||

    OK, I know the team hasn't been that good recently, but Richmond? No one deserves that.

  • juris imprudent||

    Brilliant motivational ploy - so boys, how long do you want to stay in training camp?

  • Virginian||

    Blow me. RVA rules.

    We got hipster girls......and......well.....there's a river.

    Plus VCU Rams basketball!

  • C. S. P. Schofield||

    The only Pro-Sports franchise that I know of that has a reasonable ownership arrangement is The Green Bay Packers. And I am given to understand that the NFL will entertain the possibility of another such arrangement when it can be reliably determined that Hell has frozen over.

  • juris imprudent||

    when it can be reliably determined that Hell has frozen over

    That would be when they are sipping drinks chilled by Hades brand ice cubes.

  • ChrisO||

    The NFL charter specifically bans such arrangements, and the Packers are grandfathered in.

  • C. S. P. Schofield||

    Further, I gather that the NFL management wishes they HADN'T grandfathered the Packers in. Some day some big city mayor is going to decide to take on the NFL over this nonsense. He'll almost certainly be a grandstanding jerk, like LaGuardia or Bloomberg, but it'll sure be fun to watch.

  • Emmerson Biggins||

    The third richest professional sports team in the world will receive nearly $7 million in subsidies to train in Virginia.

    If they could get 100 million a year they'd be the richest!

  • Doctor Whom||

    Taxpayer funding for PBS, football, or Hollywood redistributes income from the less wealthy to the wealthier.

  • Aresen||

    "Rob from the wretch to give to the Peer."
    - the late, great Johnny Hart.

  • DantoRang||

    Sounds like a pretty rock solid plan to me dude.

    www.Anon-Anon.tk

  • I Came Inside Your Mom||

    This is nothing compared to what Minnesota went through with the Vikings. Still, theft is theft - large or small.

  • IceTrey||

    Forget the UFC. The best MMA ever was the World Combat League. You got points deducted if you DIDN'T fight!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEf8cRicJME

  • Christina||

    As a Loudoun County homeowner I'm getting effed on two fronts with this deal. I'd rather let Maryland take the Redskins. Though I would be sorry to see the players themselves go. It is fun to spot them 'in the wild.'

  • Christina||

    I'm getting effed on two fronts with this deal.

    Really it's more like DP.

  • joy||

    Supporters say it provides content otherwise unavailable to the viewing and listening public. Without public money, http://www.petwinkel.com/pet-armani-c-19.html goes the argument, rare and special voices would fall silent.

  • ||

    I'll take your word for it.

  • Robert||

    Ach, Injun raid!

    Oh...those Redskins.

  • ||

    At the height of the public-radio debate last spring, the governor argued that "in today's free market, with hundreds of radio and television programs, government should not be subsidizing one particular group of stations. We must get http://www.lunettesporto.com/l.....-3_11.html serious about government spending. That means funding our core functions well, and eliminating spending on programs and services that should be left to the private sector.”

  • tee shirt pas cher||

    The announcement that the Washington Redskins will move their training camp to Richmond was met with mixed emotions, as they say. It’s certainly great news for Virginia’s capital city. Virginians across the state are happy the Skins will not decamp to Maryland. On the other hand, a fair number are shocked at the public funds being lavished on the team.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement